New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/patsfans-com-patriots-fan-forum.html)
-   -   Updated tiebreaker analysis (w/ bonus) (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/45796-updated-tiebreaker-analysis-w-bonus.html)

Isaac 12-04-2006 03:14 PM

Updated tiebreaker analysis (w/ bonus)
 
(An update on last week’s tiebreaker analysis: http://208.109.107.176/new-england-p...ad.php?t=45599)

The win against the Lions clears things up a bit, as now our conference record mirrors our overall record. We took an enormous hit in strength of victory though, so I’m worried about that one now (more below). Not much has changed from last week except San Diego only has one more chance to lose (this week against Denver), otherwise they get the common games tiebreaker. Also, there has been a lot of posting about 3-way ties—that only would help us if we'd have a better conference record, which we wouldn’t. The only tiebreaker below we have a chance of getting is against San Diego.

Vs. Jets (Pats 9-3, Jets 7-5)
2nd tiebreaker: Division record - Pats 4-1, Jets 3-1.
Remaining games: Pats at Phins, Jets vs Bills and at Phins.
Outlook: Patriots can secure a tie for this one with a win over Phins, otherwise the Jets could get this tiebreaker.

3rd tiebreaker: Common games
Jets schedule:
Sep 10 @Tennessee Won 23-16 (Pats to play)
Sep 24 @Buffalo Won 28-20 (Pats win)
Oct 1 Indianapolis Lost 28-31 (Pats loss)
Oct 8 @Jacksonville Lost 0-41 (Pats to play)
Oct 15 Miami Won 20-17 (Pats to win)
Oct 22 Detroit Won 31-24 (Pats to play)
Nov 19 Chicago Lost 0-10 (Pats win)
Nov 26 Houston Won 26-11 (Pats to play)
Dec 3 @Green Bay Won (Pats win)
Dec 10 Buffalo 4:15pm (Pats win)
Dec 17 @Minnesota 1:00pm (Pats win)
Dec 25 @Miami 8:30pm (Pats to play)
Current: Jets 6-3, Pats 7-1
Outlook: All the Patriots remaining games are common games, as are 3 of the Jets' games. But since the Jets need to make up two games anyway, this would likely end up in a tie (as long as the Jets beat Oakland). There are only two non-common games in these schedules, and both teams would be 1-1 in those if the Jets beat Oakland.

4th tiebreaker: AFC record (thanks to Alamo for pointing out my original mistake). Jets 5-4, Pats 5-3. It goes to the Jets since we'd have to lose two AFC games in order to tie with them.

Overall: Obviously with a two-game lead we hope that the tiebreaker won't come into play. If it does, the Jets get it by division record or AFC record.

vs. Ravens (Pats 9-3, Ravens 9-3)
2nd tiebreaker: AFC record (Pats 5-3, Ravens 6-2)
It goes to the Ravens, both teams have all their remaining games in-conference so no way for the Patriots to gain a game in the conference record and still be tied. Note that this includes any multi-way ties since it’s the second tiebreaker after head-to-head.
Ravens remaining schedule:
Dec 10 @Kansas City 1:00pm
Dec 17 Cleveland 1:00pm
Dec 24 @Pittsburgh 1:00pm
Dec 31 Buffalo 1:00pm
Outlook: Similar to our schedule in toughness, we’ll see.

vs. Dolts (Pats 9-3, Dolts 10-2)
1st tiebreaker: Colts by head to head, but probably wouldn’t apply if in a multi-way tie.
2nd tiebreaker: AFC record (Pats 5-3, Dolts 7-1)
It goes to the Dolts, both teams have all their remaining games in-conference so no way for the Patriots to gain 2 games in the conference record and still be tied. Note that this includes any multi-way ties since it’s the second tiebreaker after head-to-head.
Dolts remaining schedule:
Dec 10 @Jacksonville 1:00pm
Dec 18 Cincinnati 8:30pm
Dec 24 @Houston 1:00pm
Dec 31 Miami 1:00pm
Outlook: Slightly tougher than our schedule in toughness, we’ll see.

vs. Chargers (Pats 9-3, Chargers 10-2)
2nd tiebreaker: AFC record (Pats 5-3, Chargers 8-2)
Chargers remaining schedule:
Dec 10 Denver 4:15pm (AFC)
Dec 17 Kansas City 4:05pm (AFC)
Dec 24 @Seattle 4:15pm
Dec 31 Arizona 4:15pm
Outlook: The Chargers have to lose one of these three AFC games to give the Patriots a chance to tie this by winning out their AFC games.

3rd tiebreaker: common games
Common games:
Sep 17 Tennessee Won (Pats to play)
Nov 12 @Cincinnati Won (Pats win)
Nov 19 @Denver Won (Pats loss)
Dec 3 @Buffalo Won (Pats win X 2)
Dec 10 Denver
Current: SD 4-0, Patriots 3-1
Remaining: SD - Denver; Pats - Tenn.
Outlook: If the Patriots beat Tennessee, SD needs to lose to Denver to force a tie.

4th tiebreaker: Strength of victory. I haven’t done the math, but I may later in the week (unless anyone else volunteers!). Currently (http://www.nfl.com/standings/conference) the Patriots have a big lead (.463 to .392), but not as large as last week. It seems like we’d get it, but without doing the math I’m not sure.

Overall: A loss by San Diego to Denver and the tie probably goes to the Patriots, otherwise the Chargers get it.

Bonus: Miami (5-7) vs. wildcard contenders (all at 7-5)
1st tiebreaker: Head-to-head
Oct 15 @N.Y. Jets Lost 17-20
Nov 12 Kansas City Won 13-10
Dec 3 Jacksonville Lost 10-24
Dec 25 N.Y. Jets 8:30pm
Outlook: They do have it over KC, could tie with the Jets with a xmas win, but they lose it to Jax.

2nd tiebreaker: Division or AFC record
Jets: Division record
Phins (0-3), Jets (3-1)
Others: AFC record, the Dolphins have 6 AFC losses.
Cincinnati 5-3
Jacksonville 4-4
Kansas City 3-5
Denver 7-3
Outlook: Cinci and Denver own the tiebreaker with the fins at 9-7 via AFC record, they could tie the Jets and Jax on this one at 9-7 (Jets would have to lose to Bills).

3rd tiebreaker: I ain’t doing common games for the lowly dolphins.

Overall: I guess they aren’t mathematically eliminated yet, but damn close. Two of these teams probably will make it 10-6, but the Phins have to hope that Jax, Cinci, and Denver don’t even make it to 9-7!

As always, let me know about errors or omissions. Tiebreaker rules here: http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakers.

PatsFanSince74 12-04-2006 03:37 PM

Re: Updated tiebreaker analysis (w/ bonus)
 
whoa! great work and thanks. i take away that, except for a tie with the Chargers, we're gonna have a tough time winning tie breakers.

alamo 12-04-2006 04:05 PM

Re: Updated tiebreaker analysis (w/ bonus)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Isaac (Post 254343)
(An update on last week’s tiebreaker analysis: Vs. Jets (Pats 9-3, Jets 7-5)
4th tiebreaker: Strength of victory.

4th tiebreaker for division ties is not SOV, it's conference record. If the Jets win out they will be 8-4 in the AFC. If the Jets do win out, for the tiebreaker to even matter we will have to lose two, bringing our AFC record to 7-5. So we would lose on conference record and never get to SOV.

Isaac 12-04-2006 05:00 PM

Re: Updated tiebreaker analysis (w/ bonus)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by alamo (Post 254367)
4th tiebreaker for division ties is not SOV, it's conference record. If the Jets win out they will be 8-4 in the AFC. If the Jets do win out, for the tiebreaker to even matter we will have to lose two, bringing our AFC record to 7-5. So we would lose on conference record and never get to SOV.

You are the first one to catch that in 3 weeks of posting, thank you! Makes the Dolphins game less important than I thought, the tiebreaker goes to the Jets. I'll edit the above.

RayClay 12-04-2006 05:19 PM

Re: Updated tiebreaker analysis (w/ bonus)
 
As always, I greatly appreciate the work put in to charts and analyses.

Please try to bump this occasionally and I will do the same as it seems we have plenty of stickies right now.

VJCPatriot 12-04-2006 05:20 PM

Re: Updated tiebreaker analysis (w/ bonus)
 
So basically we want the Donkeys to beat the Chargers next week right? As for the Colts they can lose the rest of their games for all I care... :)

alamo 12-04-2006 06:43 PM

Re: Updated tiebreaker analysis (w/ bonus)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Isaac (Post 254406)
You are the first one to catch that in 3 weeks of posting, thank you! Makes the Dolphins game less important than I thought, the tiebreaker goes to the Jets. I'll edit the above.

You're welcome, and thanks for doing this, I like following it. I'd likely have caught it earlier but I wasn't reading much here the past 2 or 3 weeks due to the site slowness. Glad that's fixed!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563