New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/patsfans-com-patriots-fan-forum.html)
-   -   Cutting off Branch: First indication of franchise rot? (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/41700-cutting-off-branch-first-indication-franchise-rot.html)

tailgater 09-17-2006 07:57 AM

Cutting off Branch: First indication of franchise rot?
 
http://www.newsday.com/sports/printe...y-sports-print

All of a sudden his agents are pretty mouthy. "Contentious negotiations?" Since when? Pats hadn't talked to them since April! I am curious about the statement of a player calling Branch...Brady?

PatsChick87 09-17-2006 08:10 AM

Re: Cutting off Branch: First indication of franchise rot?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tailgater
http://www.newsday.com/sports/printe...y-sports-print

All of a sudden his agents are pretty mouthy. "Contentious negotiations?" Since when? Pats hadn't talked to them since April! I am curious about the statement of a player calling Branch...Brady?

Who's surprised that these agents would react this way? They have nothing to loose and everything to gain with this type of media coverage. I agree on the premise that the Patriots wanted to keep their WR, but it's kinda hard to keep someone who's so determined to wreak havoc with your contract/negotiation formula.

Pats726 09-17-2006 08:16 AM

Re: Cutting off Branch: First indication of franchise rot?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tailgater
http://www.newsday.com/sports/printe...y-sports-print

All of a sudden his agents are pretty mouthy. "Contentious negotiations?" Since when? Pats hadn't talked to them since April! I am curious about the statement of a player calling Branch...Brady?

I am curious about how this writer has made up things that never happened. I am starting to think MOST agents are pond scum..fight for what is right?? Liek not honoring contracts?? Like not showing up for work?? Sorry the Twig will get his as he back pedals his importnace..Give me the money but NOT the spotlight...

PATSNUTme 09-17-2006 08:17 AM

Re: Cutting off Branch: First indication of franchise rot?
 
Please let this be the last Branch thread posted on this message board.

Also, please no more salary cap threads untill they apply to a certain player.

Thank you

DefenseRules 09-17-2006 08:30 AM

Re: Cutting off Branch: First indication of franchise rot?
 
This Branch business is getting ridiculous. I'm not even going to waste my time reading that entire article. The first two paragraphs were enough.
The media is making more out of this than is necessary. This entire offseason the media has thrown dirt at this team. From the head coach to ownership. I'm probably paranoid, but it feels like there is a contious effort to bring this team down. Congratulations to them, they've won round one. We'll see what happens next. I'll bet money that our FO won't get burned like this again by anyone. I don't think Brady was the only one who learned from this experience. As for the agents, who cares what they have to say.

Branch is not the only player who held out this offseason. Are the Denver Broncos falling apart because Lelie held out? The Patriots did not miscalculate Branch's value. The Seahawks overpaid for it. Whatever, they can have him. I'm tired of talking about him, and I'm tired of hearing about him. Branch is not and never was the most important player on this team. Let the mediots say what they want.

This team has a bright future. We are getting younger, We are in GREAT cap shape, and the core of this team is still intact. I never considered Branch as part of that group, and I never will. Come on guys, BREATHE. This team got over the loss of Milloy. They will get over this one. We had some losses this year, more than usual. I'm sure the guys on the team were wondering so who replaces this guy or that guy. I wonder if we would still have all that cap space if the Pats weren't so busy trying to sign LAW and the Obnipotent One. :rolleyes: Maybe we could have spent our money elsewhere if they weren't saving it for them.

And another thing. Somebody please explain to me when Deion Branch became a perenniel Pro Bowl WR, who produced 1,000 plus yards receiving the last four years? Jeez, a Super Bowl MVP sure does wonders for a players reputation. :rolleyes:

Willie55 09-17-2006 08:37 AM

Re: Cutting off Branch: First indication of franchise rot?
 
Quote:

By agreeing late in the preseason to give Branch's agents a week to seek teams willing to reach contract agreements and trade for him, the Patriots gambled he wouldn't get a deal close to what he got. They lost. The agents - Jason Chayut, Brian Mackler and Alan Herman of New York-based SportStars - got the Jets and Seahawks to agree on six-year, $39-million deals, surpassing the Patriots' best offer by $10 million.
I still dont see how the Patriots lost. They got a 1st round pick for a #2 receiver.

DefenseRules 09-17-2006 08:44 AM

Re: Cutting off Branch: First indication of franchise rot?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie55
I still dont see how the Patriots lost. They got a 1st round pick for a #2 receiver.

Willie, don't worry about it. After hearing Jonathan Kraft the other day, I'm beginning to wonder if the media is jumping to conclusions and making things up.:rolleyes:
He said that Branch's camp was not countering any of the offers and that the Patriots offer was not necessarily still on the table at the time of that announcement. We will never know.
They did the right thing, IMO. The guy was unsignable. Anyone who turns down two offers, and is determined to hold out without even trying to counter those offers, is UNSIGNABLE IMO. They traded him while his value was high. If they had waited, I don't think that we would have received a first round pick.

BelichickFan 09-17-2006 08:50 AM

Re: Cutting off Branch: First indication of franchise rot?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie55
I still dont see how the Patriots lost. They got a 1st round pick for a #2 receiver.

Yeah, I'm fine with it. Everyone is saying we blew it by letting him look around but the other option would be for him to still be sitting at home. That MAY have resulted in him returning Week 10, being Franchised and then traded for a #1 but it may not. Having the extra #1 in the bag can hardly be considered losing.

ClosingTime 09-17-2006 08:53 AM

Re: Cutting off Branch: First indication of franchise rot?
 
Where did that thread go where I stated that players were upset at the way the Pats FO handled this situation? And people called me a liar. Well I guess I'll keep this on file in case I need to defend my good name in the future...




Patriots veterans were clearly upset at Branch's departure, especially given that he had done everything the organization had asked. The fact that the team is attempting to recoup nearly $800,000 in fines and bonus money only adds to the frustration. "When you look at Deion Branch, he embodies everything as a football player and everything that we talked about as the type of guys we want on this team," said Pro Bowl defensive end Richard Seymour, who briefly held out last year in a contract dispute. "I saw a lot of hearts broken when coach Belichick announced that move."

tdw777 09-17-2006 08:55 AM

Re: Cutting off Branch: First indication of franchise rot?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DefenseRules
.....The media is making more out of this than is necessary.....

which has been the case from the start.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563