|
Coverage Teams Should Be Improved
We lost Chatham. Izzo and Davis MAY have lost a step.
HOWEVER, we added Jones, Gardner and Guss Scott. We may even keep Hank the gunner (well backup gunner). I think this group should be improved, but don't expect Davis or Izzo to go anywhere. We don't need to lose anyone. |
Re: Coverage Teams Should Be Improved
I don't think there is any question that Izzo is losing a step. His tackle stats were way off. Don and Stone plainly outplayed him and Chatham wasn't far behind. Stone and Chatham are gone. Enter Mitchell, (exit Mel), Tebucky, Mills, Sanders, Guss, Mincey and a hoard of thousands.
I reserve judgment. The grade is INComplete. But before you can improve it, you have to agree there is a problem. The Coaches are in agreement, and trying to do something. |
Re: Coverage Teams Should Be Improved
Quote:
We do need to lose Davis and Izzo. If you're part of the problem (et tu, Seeley?), then you're not part of the solution. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.