![]() |
OT: ProFootballFocus.com
boooooo..........I think they went pay this weekend.
it's a sad time in my life. |
Re: OT - profootballfocus
PFF was the most misleading and generally bad football stat site on the net anyways. There are much, much better resources out there.
|
Re: OT - profootballfocus
Perhaps they are hiring professionals so they can put out a good product?
|
Re: OT: profootballfocus.com
They want $90 a year. But don't worry, you can get a free subscription:
Quote:
They're going to farm out the work and charge the regular schmucks 90 bucks for it. |
Re: OT: ProFootballFocus.com
From what I can see of their rankings, they aren't worth the money when they were free. Stats in football except for a few positions are not really a great way to measure players especially the o-line.
|
Re: OT: ProFootballFocus.com
Quote:
|
Re: OT: ProFootballFocus.com
Quote:
|
Re: OT: ProFootballFocus.com
This is hilarious. Do they think they'll get even 1/10 as many hits if people have to pay $90 for it?
|
Re: OT: ProFootballFocus.com
Quote:
|
Re: OT: ProFootballFocus.com
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.