New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   Political Discussion (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/12/political-discussion.html)
-   -   More Details about the Army Rape and Massacre (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/12/37485-more-details-about-army-rape-massacre.html)

mikey 07-02-2006 10:09 PM

More Details about the Army Rape and Massacre
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...070200673.html

Details Emerge in Alleged Army Rape, Killings

By Ellen Knickmeyer
Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, July 3, 2006; A15

BAGHDAD, July 2 -- Fifteen-year-old Abeer Qasim Hamza was afraid, her mother confided in a neighbor.

As pretty as she was young, the girl had attracted the unwelcome attention of U.S. soldiers manning a checkpoint that the girl had to pass through almost daily in their village in the south-central city of Mahmudiyah, her mother told the neighbor.

Abeer told her mother again and again in her last days that the soldiers had made advances toward her, a neighbor, Omar Janabi, said this weekend, recounting a conversation he said he had with the girl's mother, Fakhriyah, on March 10.

Fakhriyah feared that the Americans might come for her daughter at night, at their home. She asked her neighbor if Abeer might sleep at his house, with the women there.

Janabi said he agreed.

Then, "I tried to reassure her, remove some of her fear," Janabi said. "I told her, the Americans would not do such a thing."

Abeer did not live to take up the offer of shelter.

Instead, attackers came to the girl's house the next day, apparently separating Abeer from her mother, father and young sister.

Janabi and others knowledgeable about the incident said they believed that the attackers raped Abeer in another room. Medical officials who handled the bodies also said the girl had been raped, but they did not elaborate.

Before leaving, the attackers fatally shot the four family members -- two of Abeer's brothers had been away at school -- and attempted to set Abeer's body on fire, according to Janabi, another neighbor who spoke on condition of anonymity, the mayor of Mahmudiyah and a hospital administrator with knowledge of the case.

The U.S. military said last week that authorities were investigating allegations of a rape and killings in Mahmudiyah by soldiers of the 502nd Infantry Regiment, part of the 4th Infantry Division.

The mayor of Mahmudiyah, Mouyad Fadhil Saif, said Sunday that the case was being investigated by the U.S. military as an alleged atrocity.

Janabi was one of the first people to arrive at the house after the attack, he said Saturday, speaking to a Washington Post special correspondent at the home of local tribal leaders. He said he found Abeer sprawled dead in a corner, her hair and a pillow next to her consumed by fire, and her dress pushed up to her neck.

"I was sure from the first glance that she had been raped," he said.

Despite the reassurances he had given the girl's mother earlier, Janabi said, "I wasn't surprised what had happened, when I found that the suspicion of the mother was correct."

The U.S. military has not identified the victims. U.S. military officials contacted this weekend said they did not know the names of the people involved or most other details of the case, although one military official confirmed that according to preliminary information gathered by investigators, the family lived near a U.S. checkpoint and the killings happened about March 12.

The military official pointed to one discrepancy in the accounts, however. Preliminary information in the military investigation put the age of the alleged rape victim at 20, rather than 15, as reported by her neighbors, officials and hospital records and officials in Mahmudiyah.

U.S. soldiers at the scene initially ascribed the killings to Sunni Arab insurgents active in the area, the U.S. military and local residents said. That puzzled villagers, who knew that the family was Sunni, Janabi said. Other residents assumed the killings were sectarian, with Shiite Muslim militiamen as the likely culprit.

But on June 23, three months after the incident, two soldiers of the 502nd came forward to say that soldiers of the unit were responsible, a U.S. military official said last week. The U.S. military began an investigation the next day, the official said.

Officials said last week that none of the four soldiers under investigation had been detained, although one had been discharged for unrelated reasons.

Family members have given permission for exhumation of Abeer's body, Janabi and the mayor said.

The case is at least the fourth American military investigation announced since March of alleged atrocities by U.S. forces in Iraq.

The rape allegation makes the Mahmudiyah case potentially incendiary in Iraq. Rape is seen as a crime smearing the honor of the family as well as the victim in conservative communities here.

Death certificates viewed Sunday at the Mahmudiyah hospital identified the victims as Fakhriyah Taha Muhsin, 34, killed by gunshots to her head; Qasim Hamza Raheem, 45, whose head was "smashed" by bullets; Hadeel Qasim Hamza, 7, Abeer's sister, shot; and Abeer, shot in the head. Abeer's body also showed burns, the death certificate noted.

Janabi said U.S. soldiers controlled the scene of the killings for several hours on March 11, telling neighbors that insurgents were responsible. The bodies of the victims were taken to Mahmudiyah hospital by March 12, according to Janabi and an official at the hospital, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

On March 13, a man identifying himself as a relative claimed the bodies for burial, the hospital official said. An hour after the man left with the bodies, U.S. soldiers came to the hospital and asked about the bodies, the hospital official said.

The next day, the hospital official said, soldiers scoured the area, trying to find the funeral for the family.

"But they did not find it, simply because the relatives did not do it, because the death includes the rape of one of the family members, which is something shameful in our tradition," the hospital official said.

"The family kept the news a secret, fearing the disgrace," he said. "They thought it was done by militias, not U.S. forces."

Reached by telephone Saturday at his home in Iskandariyah, south of Mahmudiyah, a member of the extended family would not discuss the incident.

"What is the benefit of publishing this story?" said Abeer's uncle, Bassem. "People will read about this crime. And they will forget about it the next day."

Two special correspondents in Mahmudiyah and special correspondent Bassam Sebti in Baghdad contributed to this report.

.

IcyPatriot 07-02-2006 10:41 PM

Mikey...I think this article is better as to fairness. That's why some here accuse you of not caring...So you would believe Sunni's before Americans? In any case, it appears something happened that puts these men in a bad situation...if they did it...they deserve punishment. In any case, because it's our soldiers, I would have at least posted this story.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/...n1773844.shtml

Quote:

Did Suspected GIs Plan Rape-Slaying?
Investigators Believe U.S. Soldiers Under Investigation Plotted Attack For Nearly A Week

BEIJI, Iraq, July 1, 2006

(CBS/AP) Investigators believe the U.S. soldiers suspected of raping an Iraqi woman, then killing her and members of her family plotted the attack for nearly a week, a U.S. military official said Saturday.

The official, who is close to the investigation, told The Associated Press that flammable liquid was used to burn the woman's body in a cover-up attempt, although it was not clear if it was gasoline or lighter fluid.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity because the investigation is ongoing, said it appeared the attack was "totally premeditated" and that the soldiers "studied them for about a week."

According to the official, the Sunni Arab family had just moved into a new home in the insurgent-riddled area around Mahmoudiya, south of Baghdad. The Americans entered the home, separated three males from the woman, then raped her and set fire to her body, the official said. The three males were also slain.

U.S. officials said they knew of the deaths but thought the victims died due to sectarian violence. But Mahmoudiya police Capt. Ihsan Abdul-Rahman said Iraqi officials received a report March 13 alleging that American soldiers had killed the family. The incident occurred in the Khasir Abyad area, about 6 miles north of Mahmoudiya, he said.

There were some discrepancies over how many soldiers were being investigated. The U.S. official said it was at least four. Two other U.S. officials said Friday that five were under investigation but one already had been discharged for unspecified charges unrelated to the killings and was believed to be in the United States.

In Baghdad, the U.S. military issued a terse statement Friday, saying only that Maj. Gen. James D. Thurman, commander of the 4th Infantry Division, ordered a criminal investigation into the alleged slaying of a family of four in Mahmoudiya, 20 miles south of Baghdad.

The four still in the Army have had their weapons taken away and are confined to a U.S. base near Mahmoudiya, officials said. If convicted of premeditated murder, the soldiers could receive a death sentence under U.S. military law.

The suspects in the killing were from the same platoon as two soldiers kidnapped and killed south of Baghdad this month, another official close to the investigation said Friday. Their mutilated bodies were found June 19, three days after they were abducted by insurgents near Youssifiyah southwest of Baghdad.

The military has said one and possibly both of the slain soldiers were tortured and beheaded. The official said the mutilation of the slain soldiers stirred feelings of guilt and led at least one member of the platoon to reveal the rape-slaying on June 22.

One soldier was arrested after admitting his role in the alleged attack on the family, he said on condition of anonymity because the case is under way. The official said the rape and killings appear to have been a "crime of opportunity," noting that the soldiers had not been attacked by insurgents but had noticed the woman on previous patrols.

One of the family members they allegedly killed was a child, said a senior Army official who also requested anonymity because the investigation is ongoing. The senior official said the alleged incident was first revealed by a soldier during a routine counseling-type session. The official said that soldier did not witness the incident but heard about it.

A second soldier, who also was not involved, said he overhead soldiers conspiring to commit the crimes and then later saw bloodstains on their clothes, the official said.

The allegations of rape could generate a particularly strong backlash in Iraq, a conservative, strongly religious society in which many women will not even shake hands with men who are not close relatives.

The case is among the most serious against U.S. soldiers allegedly involved in the deaths of Iraqi civilians. At least 14 U.S. troops have been convicted
I must admit...it does not look good here. However, this crime is so horrendous it appears to be beyond belief. I still feel there is something missing here...I hope I'm right. Some will laugh, but could the marines spilling the beans here have been threatened with harm to their families? I'd like to give our men every chance possible to refute this...I hope and pray for the soldiers involved and the slain family...such a sensless tragedy regardless of guilt.

patsfan13 07-02-2006 10:48 PM

Well Mikey I would say alleged rape and massacre. These men are innocent until PROVEN guilty. If they commited a crime they should be punished. However, we know from Zarqwai's own memo's that this is a tactic, that the enemy was using (committing atrocities and blaming the coalation troops).

Looking at the acts they have bragged about this is not a stretch. I find it interesting that since the media made a big deal about Haditha there have been a spate of charges against American troops. BTW there was a similar charge against British troops that has been refuted.

Mikey do you beieve these charges or are giving the troops the benefit of the doubt?

maverick4 07-03-2006 07:37 AM

re
 
If I were an Iraqi teenager I would hate the United States.
I wouldn't care that Saddam was removed from power.

Imagine the same scenario happening in our country:
- You live under a despotic President.
- A foreign power eliminates your government and occupies your country.
- All of your national treasures and museums are looted.
- Allegations of these military occupants killing innocent civilians
- Allegations of these military occupants raping women and killing children.

Any normal, self-respecting, country-loving person would eventually come to hate their 'liberators'.

This entire war is going to create huge problems for us in the future. We are causing an entire generation of young people to grow up and hate us.

.

bmf31c 07-03-2006 07:51 AM

Yeah, I would hate the people that brought water and electricity to my village when I have been deprived of it my entire life because I was a different sect of a religion.
I would hate the people that built a school and a place of worship for me.
I would hate the people that are creating jobs and infrastructure and a elected government OF the people.

But what I really hate is the people that report all the bad, and blow off all the good.
I hate the people that stick up for the worthless piles of **** that blow themselves up in crowded markets. Those are people that are worthy of hate.

We are hated by the Japanese, Germans, French, Filipinos, Koreans, and Kuwaitis?

No?

There goes that theory.

maverick4 07-03-2006 08:00 AM

re
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bmf31c
We are hated by the Japanese, Germans, French, Filipinos, Koreans, and Kuwaitis? No? There goes that theory.

What we are doing in Iraq is different, I hope you see this.

You can bet that even if Bush was found torturing American citizens, that we were all in poverty, and another country invaded us and occupied us, that all of the American militias and people with guns would be fighting the soldiers who came.

.

bmf31c 07-03-2006 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maverick4
What we are doing in Iraq is different, I hope you see this.

You can bet that even if Bush was found torturing American citizens, that we were all in poverty, and another country invaded us and occupied us, that all of the American militias and people with guns would be fighting the soldiers who came.

.

That's an oversimplification of what is going on, and if you can't see that you are severely uninformed.

Iraq was going to happen regardless of who the President was. Bush made a huge mistake in his timing and in not getting a unilateral force to go. In time we could have had an international force and Bush wouldn't have come out of this looking so stupid.

PATSNUTme 07-03-2006 03:07 PM

This is a political discussion forum. So, why has this "story' been posted twice by the same poster?

If it did happen, these soldiers commited a crime and that has nothing to do with politics. They should be given a trail and if convicted given a severe punishment. BUT, this is not a crime forum.

The fact that Mikey needed to start 2 threads about this speaks volumes of what a pig he is. Any time a solider is killed, any time a crime is alledged againts our military, you can bet Mikey will start a thread.

So, why on a political discussion forum? Because any story involving the death or alledged crime againts our military is good news for Mikey's political agenda,he thinks. That is obvious and transparent and makes Mikey the scum that he is.

I don't think that Miley cares that our military consists of Rep's, Dem's, Ind's, and "i don't care", political parties. That they are just trying to do their jobs and make it home. Like all soldiers since the beginning of time.

PatsFanInVa 07-03-2006 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bmf31c
Yeah, I would hate the people that brought water and electricity to my village when I have been deprived of it my entire life because I was a different sect of a religion.
I would hate the people that built a school and a place of worship for me.
I would hate the people that are creating jobs and infrastructure and a elected government OF the people.

But what I really hate is the people that report all the bad, and blow off all the good.
I hate the people that stick up for the worthless piles of **** that blow themselves up in crowded markets. Those are people that are worthy of hate.

We are hated by the Japanese, Germans, French, Filipinos, Koreans, and Kuwaitis?

No?

There goes that theory.

Do you have numbers on average access to water, electricity, medical care, etc., before and after we "shocked and awed" Iraq?

The difficulty here is that:
1) Yes, we are putting a massive effort into rebuilding Iraq, but
2) We destroyed a functioning -- if dictatorial -- nation in the first place.

I am not singing the praises of pre-Invasion Iraq, I am just being real here. The odds that the US is considered a liberator in Iraq will increase proportionate to the increase in quality of life of the average Iraqi.

This also does not assume that the U.S. is responsible for the destruction loosed in the current civil war; that argument is not necessary to determine whether the average Iraqi is likely to view us as a liberator, because the deeds of one party can so easily be shifted to the ledger sheet of another, in the mind of an occupied party. This is not an argument about justice, or about whether the "hearts and minds" in Iraq are unduly swayed against a "truly" benign American presence. It is just a question of what the average Iraqi feels about the American presence. I'm not sure we're viewed as liberators by the majority.

Back for more after dinner,

PFnV

maverick4 07-03-2006 06:33 PM

re
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsFanInVa
This also does not assume that the U.S. is responsible for the destruction loosed in the current civil war; that argument is not necessary to determine whether the average Iraqi is likely to view us as a liberator, because the deeds of one party can so easily be shifted to the ledger sheet of another, in the mind of an occupied party. This is not an argument about justice, or about whether the "hearts and minds" in Iraq are unduly swayed against a "truly" benign American presence. It is just a question of what the average Iraqi feels about the American presence. I'm not sure we're viewed as liberators by the majority.

EXACTLY.

PFnV, you are a wise, wise person. Not just this response, but your posts in general.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC