NEM Is Going to LOVE This
 

Newly released report shows 500 chemical weapons found in Iraq since 2003.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html

As Sean Hannity is suggesting, Liberals should apologize for politicizing the WMD issue and not getting behind the the operations in Iraq for the right reasons.

You used the words "Fox" and "Hannity" is one post so all the Libs will ignore anything thereafter in your post :rolleyes:

You cannot possibly be serious in suggesting that WMD's were discovered in Iraq. Had that piece of "news" had an ounce of credibility, FOX would be broadcasting it 24/7, not to mention the administration.

Actually the military says they havebeencollecting them since 2003. On the foxwebsitethereis a link to a PDF from Some Pertagon person to the members of the intel commitee members and House and Senate leaders saying that 500+ artillery dhells with Sarin have been recovered. The shells date from pre 1991. This is data that has been declassified. Apparetly there is other information that is still classified.

:rofl:
What a friggin joke. Talk about the imbecile and his rumpswabs stringing together scraps and peices of lint to justify invading another country and killing tens of thousands in the process. You Kool-Aid junkies need to come up with more than expired dust that used to be dangerous that they got from us.
Dumbarses! :rofl:

You really hate any information that challenges your views,gotta become a little more tolerant.:D

No matter how many WMD's they find the Neo Libs will deny it, they will say they aren't WMD's, they will even say they are the wrong Color to be WMD's, when they get real desperate they will say "Haliburton & Jeb Bush planted them"

The Democrats should send Jessie Jackoff over there to check this whole story out.

I told all you haters weeks ago they would find these before November, wait till you see the next Rabbit Bush pulls out of the hat (Osama Bin Laden in chains) :singing:

Landslide in November, remember where you heard it,.

"that's right Harry" :rocker:

There were 500 artillery canisters of mustard gas and sarin gas.

Although many of the canisters were 'degraded", that just means that they would not be effective if fired as artillery rounds.

The "degraded" mustard and sarin gas could be taken out of the shell and used effectively with a small explosive devise on a subway, a shopping mall, or a busy city street.

So, this stuff could be given or used by terrorist. My question would be: If they were "degraded" and not usable as artillery rounds, why keep them hanging around?

These are old expired weapons that should have been destroyed:

"The weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s. But they do show that Saddam Hussein was lying when he said all weapons had been destroyed, and it shows that years of on-again, off-again weapons inspections did not uncover these munitions.

...

"Offering the official administration response to FOX News, a senior Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions."

And it sort of sounds like the weapons were difficult for anyone to find, including Saddam:

"'It turned out the whole country was an ammo dump," [a Defense Dept official] said, adding that on more than one occasion, a conventional weapons site has been uncovered and chemical weapons have been discovered mixed within them."

That said, for those still struggling to defend Bush for saying Iraq had WMDs, this helps a little bit. If you don't have useable WMDs to make your case with and your States of the Union lies have been debunked, you might as well use whatever garbage you find (including useless remnants of a dead WMD program) to make your case.

So tell me, how was Saddam able to kill 30,000 of his own people? Chain letter?