![]() |
Rivalries
This was brought up a little bit in the addai thread, but it kind of took that one off track a little bit. It seems Pats fans don't want to consider Indy a rivalry, but when I read this forum almost every thread has some shot or comparison to the Colts. I said before, I am a Colts fan and did not come here to cause trouble. From a Colts fans perspective, I think the Pats are our #1 rivalry. Denver was brought up by a lot of the posters on here to be your #1, but I think that might be because they were the last team to beat you and there fans probably let you know about it. I have no problem with being a rival of what some consider the best team ever. I just wonder why Pats fans don't feel the same, or atleast admit it.
|
Quote:
|
Don't confuse hate with being a rival.
I hate the Colts now. In fact, they moved up to share the #2 spot with the Raiders,on my most hated teams list. The Bills, fins, & JEST are our division rivals. |
Quote:
|
I consider the Colts the top rival right now, at least for me. I hate the Colts more than any other team in the league, and want to beat them the most. To me, Pats-Colts=rivalry #1.
|
Sun 11/5/2006
Pats vs Colts. Buckle your seatbelts. Midway through the season this will be a big test for both teams. By that time we will see who's for real. |
[QUOTE=PATSNUTme]Don't confuse hate with being a rival.
I hate the Colts now. In fact, they moved up to share the #2 spot with the Raiders,on my most hated teams list. [QUOTE]Good point, though for me is is more despise than hate. |
Quote:
|
I think we're about to see the rebirth of the Dolphins as our chief rivals for the next 4-6 years.
I'm sorry, Kilowatt, that you don't have any division foes worthy of "rival" status. It must take some fun out of the game. |
Quote:
v. ri·valed, or ri·valled ri·val·ing, or ri·val·ling ri·vals or ri·vals v. tr. 1. To attempt to equal or surpass. 2. To be the equal of; match So given the definition of rival, by Definition #2, they are not rivals. The Colts are not the equal of the Pats. But interestingly, by definition #1, the colts could look at the Pats as a rival because they want to attempt to equal us. But it doesn't work the other way as the Pats do not need to equal the COlts. THey are already better. Beat the Pats when it counts, knock us out of the postseason and go on to win a SB or two. Man, then we would have a rivalry. Until then, I just don't see it. On the other hand, if the Pats and Colts continure to play a regular season game every year, I could see this forming a rivalry. But you gotta win some games first, preferably when it counts. (I hope you don't - I really dislike the COlts after they complained aobut the Pats "cheating" on defense and then were caught pumping noise into the RCA Dome through the loudspeakers.) BTW, I wish to complement you on being an excellent visitor. Most visitors here are pretty rude (though when I read the Indystar board, I am kind of embarrassed for the rudeness of visiting patsfans, so I guess being an unwelcome guest is normal.) But for me, you are welcome to post here, and I apologize for my post #2 if it was ridiculing. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.