Drafttek 7 rd mock 4/13 (not bad)
 

Draft Tek - NFL Consensus Mock Draft 2010 Round 1 (1-16)

Here are the picks...

22. Graham, DE Michigan
44. Gresham, TE Oklahoma
47. Williams, WR USC
53 Carrington DE Arkansas State
119. Chancellor, SS Va Tech
190. Blount, RB Oregon
205. Quarels, TE Penn ST.
229. Mesko, P, Michigan
231. Carroll CB, Maryland
247. Dickson, FB LSU
248. Canfield, QB Oregon ST.
250. Welch, OT Vandy


I'm not crazy about Williams (USC WR bust factor) especially when Gilary is still available at 119, but I do like the Blount, Mesko, and Dickson late picks. Overall I could live with this.

Re: Drafttek 7 rd mock 4/13 (not bad)
 

i like Blount there as well.

Re: Drafttek 7 rd mock 4/13 (not bad)
 

Would prefer to see 2 WRs (one in the 2nd and another late round "project") instead of 2 TEs.

Re: Drafttek 7 rd mock 4/13 (not bad)
 

Could Gresham really slip to the 2nd? If we could get Gresham and Graham that would be awesome. Also, IDK about Blount he seems like a punk.

Re: Drafttek 7 rd mock 4/13 (not bad)
 

I love that mock draft, especially the first 4 picks. It's not perfect, I'd take a different player in the 4th round and I prefer Bowlen to Mezko at Punter, but aside from that I'd be prety damn happy.

Re: Drafttek 7 rd mock 4/13 (not bad)
 

I like it. However, I would hope that if Odrick started to fall into the 2nd round (this mock has him going 39th to Oak) that the Pats would attempt to trade up for him. Graham and Odrick by themselves would make this a good draft.

Re: Drafttek 7 rd mock 4/13 (not bad)
 

Swap Kindle for Graham and I love it.

Don't see Gresh being there, so i'd take Gronkowski if he was there.

Gilyard or Roberts ahead of the SS in the 4th. Though if we can't get a 5th, i'd take George Selvie there.

I like Konz in 6th/7th.

Hell, i'd consider Snead in the 6th to see what he can do.

Re: Drafttek 7 rd mock 4/13 (not bad)
 

Doubt that Graham falls to #22, but I'd certainly take him.

I'd much rather take Saffold than Gresham at #44.

Damian Williams is okay at #47, I guess.

Carrington at #53 would be great, though we'd miss Tennant.

*** McCluster, Misi, Worilds, Ben Tate, Decker, Gerhart, TJ Ward, Blair White and Alualu all get by us in the 3rd.

Chancellor is -meh- at #119. I'd rather try for Dickerson (one slot up), or Gilyard, Andre Roberts, Jeremy Williams who go just after.

*** James Starks, Jamar Chaney, AJ Edds, Te'o-Nesheim all go in the 5th without us.

Shay Hodge and Joe Webb go before our first 6th-rounder. I'd rather have Lonyae Miller (2 slots down) than Blount at #190. Or Mike Kafka. I'm very good with Quarless at #205, though.

I'm also not enamored with Mesko at #229 and never heard of Nolan Carroll (#231). I'd much rather go Andre Dixon and Seyi Ajirotutu at those picks.

Dickson, Canfield, Welch at #247, 248 & 250, respectively are whatever, but, since DraftTek doesn't list PFAs after #255, the only guy left on their list who I might perefer is Hoomanawanui. Good blocker and can actually catch a little. PLUS it would be a stitch listening to Chuckie butcher the guy's name 17 different ways.

So, yeah, all-in-all not nearly as bad as most, but BB will probably do better by us.

Re: Drafttek 7 rd mock 4/13 (not bad)
 

I suppose I'm fine with Graham or Kindle instead of Odrick if I know that I will get Carrington a 53.

Re: Drafttek 7 rd mock 4/13 (not bad)
 

So much for edge rushers...meh :confused3:
In the 3-4 Graham translates to OLB
Carrington is no better than what we have, although younger.

Not my fav