![]() |
3rd for one year rental of Boldin/Burgess which do you prefer?
Which team got a better deal? 3rd for Boldin or 3rd for Burgess? Actually it was a 3rd and 5th for Burgess, I believe.
|
Re: 3rd for one year rental of Boldin/Burgess which do you prefer?
When if's and buts are candies and nutz we'll all have a wonderful x-mas!
|
Re: 3rd for one year rental of Boldin/Burgess which do you prefer?
Your a jets fan in disguise. Get off the forum. One of the posters exposed you by showing you ballwash the jets during the AFCCG and calling Mark Sanchez "heroic".
All your posts are negative trash, GFY. :D |
Re: 3rd for one year rental of Boldin/Burgess which do you prefer?
Quote:
But keep on trolling. |
Re: 3rd for one year rental of Boldin/Burgess which do you prefer?
Quote:
He was heroic compared to the dog crap people on here said he was. I won't get off the forum, you get off. I'm trying to help the team through cold hearted logic, you are just being a "fan".:rocker: |
Re: 3rd for one year rental of Boldin/Burgess which do you prefer?
Quote:
|
Re: 3rd for one year rental of Boldin/Burgess which do you prefer?
Quote:
I'd hate to think you were spending your time 'helping the team' on a message board when you could have much better access to Belichick himself by being part of the coaching team. You should expect some resistance to your righteous 'cold hearted logic', though. Belichick has something of a reputation as an overly emotional softie in league circles. |
Re: 3rd for one year rental of Boldin/Burgess which do you prefer?
To quote Kevin Weeks of Southie: Never let facts get in the way of a good story..........
Any and all bad BB FA decisions and/or draft decisions are not allowed to be discussed........... |
Re: 3rd for one year rental of Boldin/Burgess which do you prefer?
What does it matter? The Pats couldn't get Boldin because Boldin wasn't interested in being an one year rental. He could have made the trade not go through since he knew the Ravens were willing to give him an extension and the Pats weren't. Two very different situations.
People need to stop these ridiculous comparisons. If the issues wasn't the extension, Boldin might be a Patriot right now. The Pats were not going to trade for a guy who might nor report because he didn't get a new deal. |
Re: 3rd for one year rental of Boldin/Burgess which do you prefer?
Quote:
Huh? Did you miss the bit where the Ravens signed him to a 4 year $28M contract? Burgess will want a new contract, but it won't be anywhere near what Boldin wants. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.