New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/patsfans-com-patriots-fan-forum.html)
-   -   Which TE would you want? (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/31003-te-would-you-want.html)

PatsWorldChamps 02-09-2006 03:08 PM

Which TE would you want?
 
off season is boring, so...

Let's assume fauria is gone... Watson and Graham are 1 and 2...
If we drafted a TE, which would you prefer, as the patriots #3 TE?

(rated on a scale of 1 to 5; with 1 being the best)

Player A: receiving: 1 blocking: 5 (great receiver, poor blocker)
Player B: receiving: 5 blocking: 1 (poor receiver, great blocker)
Player C: receiving: 3 blocking: 3 (ok receiver, ok blocker)

Box_O_Rocks 02-09-2006 04:00 PM

Where's D, the next Grahambo Ben Kickingbutt? There are at least 4 possible matches for D - Vernon Davis, Leonard Pope, Joe(?) Klopfenstein, Dominique Byrd.

This is a rigged poll, I demand a recount!

PatsWorldChamps 02-09-2006 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Box_O_Rocks
Where's D, the next Grahambo Ben Kickingbutt? There are at least 4 possible matches for D - Vernon Davis, Leonard Pope, Joe(?) Klopfenstein, Dominique Byrd.

This is a rigged poll, I demand a recount!

I knew someone would ask for D...

D would cost us too high a draft pick. TE will be a 4 or lower

Crazy Patriot Guy 02-09-2006 04:59 PM

I voted for the great receiver because I wouldn't mind seeing us pick up David Thomas in the later rounds. I've watched that guy for four years at UT and he simply has great hands. I've seen him catch countless passes falling on his side or snagging them off his shoelaces. And even when it was very obvious that he was Vince Young's favorite target, he always seemed to get open.

Not that he's a terrible blocker though. He's just not Daniel Graham in that department.

flutie2phelan 02-09-2006 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsWorldChamps
off season is boring, so...

Can't let yourself get off on a wrong foot like that. Think of the off-season as ... foreplay. Not as exciting as the much shorter main event ... but affording considerable satisfaction in its own right - when handled properly.

Where were we then?

Ah yes ... tight ends.

Very interesting question ... especially with the stipulation (correctly, i think) that the new one is a 4th rounder or lower.

The Pats' OL is so close to Really Good ... that i presume we become Very Good either thru the draft or simply the secular improvement of the guys already here. That is, if we don't draft OL high, then BB thinks we don't need to do that. In either case, he wants a butt-kickin OL as much as we do.

Therefore, this new TE's blocking skills are not especially required ... as they were required in '05 and previous years. So i vote for a catcher who can't block.

Further, i imagine that Dante Scarnecchia can teach a rook more about blocking ... than he can about how to get open and hang onto a pass. (Still, there's always the requirement that the new TE at least be willing to put his magnificent frame into harm's way - even if he does still lack technique.)

drew4008 02-09-2006 08:32 PM

Most athletic TE in the draft. In case Graham and Watson can't play at certain times like last year, I want a weapon, instead of someone like Fauria.

PatsWorldChamps 02-09-2006 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drew4008
Most athletic TE in the draft. In case Graham and Watson can't play at certain times like last year, I want a weapon, instead of someone like Fauria.

ok numb nuts... we all want a third string weapon.... the basic question was, FOR OUR THIRD TE WOULD YOU PREFER A BLOCKER OR A RECEIVER.

Box_O_Rocks 02-09-2006 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsWorldChamps
I knew someone would ask for D...

D would cost us too high a draft pick. TE will be a 4 or lower

Eccentric big spender that I am, I would be very happy with Davis or Pope in round 1, Klopfenstein or Byrd in round 2, Fasano or Day in round 3. Fauria started a number of games for us and Graham wasn't close to 100% at the end of the year. If you want to wait for second day, I like Dockerty (Wisconsin-Oshkosh) who was an excellent blocker in the Hula Bowl - I loved the hit he put on DT Gerald Anderson of Georgia. But I expect to take a day one TE with Graham UFA in 2007 and Fauria AARP any day now.

T-ShirtDynasty 02-10-2006 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsWorldChamps
ok numb nuts... we all want a third string weapon.... the basic question was, FOR OUR THIRD TE WOULD YOU PREFER A BLOCKER OR A RECEIVER.

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsWorldChamps
wow. with geniuses like you, hard to believe we dont win every year

Quote:

Originally Posted by PatsWorldChamps
stupid question

Somebody kick your dog today? P|ss in your Wheaties? Take away your pacifier? Didja just quit Smoking? (I did today, that's why I ask) Wife cheat on you with the paperboy?

Damn man.

Look into Anger Management classes, or maybe Yoga. Maybe chilling out with some glaucoma remedy or trying some Stuart Smalley action in the mirror, y'know, "I'm smart, I'm clever, I know my football, and gosh-darnit people like me. I don't need to lash out at fellow Pats fan like Paymetons Manning lashes out at his offensive line."

Shoot, try something. All that anger just impedes bloodflow which makes your little guy turtle-up, which will make you even more angry, and before you know it... BOOM ... you're watching Mike Ditka commercials for Levitra with rapt attention.

Try a smile. It does actually feel good.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563