"When this all started 17 weeks ago, the pick to win the Super Bowl was the Indianapolis Colts. Sixteen games and 14 victories later, why should anything change?"
I think Ron meant to say my pick, as opposed to the pick. And picking them now is not really the issue. It was picking them 17 weeks ago.
Ron obviously wants those who once again questioned his agenda when he picked the Colts from week one to believe he's now got the raw numbers to justify his decision. Unfortunately he failed to account for the fact that not only do we see right through him, we too can add....
Ron seems to think it's time to face facts - how could anyone ever dream of having a shot against a team that has won 38 of 48 over the last 3 regular seasons. Honestly.
I mean you'd have to have compiled an equal record and perhaps done something even more impressive like going 9-0 in the playoffs or winning 3 of the last 4 Superbowls or had a track record of messing with Mannings head in the playoffs to even have a prayer......
Mike the Brit
01-05-2006 11:14 AM
By the way, don't they have editors at MSNBC? Ron could certainly use one ("the addition to Corey Simon", "it's" as possessive...)