![]() |
OT: David Givens sues Titans
|
Re: OT: David Givens sues Titans
First it sounds like more than just a football related injury, it sounds like it could be congenital, and playing football worsened it.
"Its not about the money" of course how could anyone be so silly to think it was. :rolleyes: "David is not the happy guy i used to know" well he can get a knee replacement. |
Re: OT: David Givens sues Titans
Quote:
|
Re: OT: David Givens sues Titans
Quote:
"it was ultimately determined that the previously-known lesion and defect in his knee had crumbled." If this is the case his knee would have crumbled eventually, football just speed up the process. I think Givens does have a case because he was NO LONGER Able to play. My problem is more with Givens agent and the dramatics. |
Re: OT: David Givens sues Titans
If the Titans failed to inform Givens about the injury or defect, then yes, he has a very strong case against them, the statute of limitations notwithstanding.
|
Re: OT: David Givens sues Titans
Quote:
|
Re: OT: David Givens sues Titans
Sounds like these findings were part of his pre contract physical. Might explain why there were never any other serious takers in his UFA season (his hometown Houston team lowballed him). It appeared at the time that Tennessee overpaid for a guy who wasn't generating the expected level of interest on the FA market. Many people have since pointed to the loss of Givens in 2005 and Branch in 2006 because the team wouldn't simply pay them as one of the reasons we failed to threepeat or fourpeat as expected... Thing is teams usually know more about players and situations than fans do. Few players come in to the league let alone remain there without both players and organizations balancing concerns, often times revolving around potential durability issues. Neither Givens nor Branch has played a full season or a meaningful role for an NFL team since the day they left.
I feel bad for David. He always seemed like a good kid and we didn't really make any effort to retain him. At the time many assumed it was just because with Branch already chomping at the bit for a new deal we couldn't or wouldn't because of how that would have raised the bar - and we were cheaping out. Perhaps all along our remarkably fallable HC was simply playing out the string with two guys he believed would never provide value with big second deals because despite some talent they had substantial potential medical/durability issues looming. |
Re: OT: David Givens sues Titans
Quote:
He should have been told beforehand. It is possible that the Titans will be not LEGALLY responsible, but I cannot see how their actions are acceptible in any way from a human or moral standpoint. |
Re: OT: David Givens sues Titans
Quote:
|
Re: OT: David Givens sues Titans
Quote:
POTD. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.