New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   Political Discussion (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/12/political-discussion.html)
-   -   2010 census looking not so good... (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/12/266352-2010-census-looking-not-so-good.html)

efin98 09-01-2009 12:55 AM

2010 census looking not so good...
 
2010 is the decennial census...Massachusetts is going to lose a seat in the House by all projections, down from 10 seats to 9 while Connecticut, Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire stay the same.

The big losers appear to be "blue states": in additon to the 1 from Massachusetts, New York loses 2 and Pennsylvania, New Jersey, California, Minnesota, Michigan, and Illinois lose 1 each. "red states" see Louisiana, Iowa, Missouri losing 1 and Ohio losing 2.

The big winners in the census may be "red" states: Texas may gain 4, Arizona 2, Georgia, Utah, North Carolina, South Carolina, Nevada 1. Florida may be a swing state with 2 more seats gain.

DarrylS 09-01-2009 03:59 AM

Re: 2010 census looking not so good...
 
You never know if Michelle Bachman et al continue to run their mouth about the Obama Acorn "Census conspiracy", a lot of the folks in red states may not respond.. the law of unintended consequences...

efin98 09-01-2009 11:39 AM

Re: 2010 census looking not so good...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DarrylS (Post 1479956)
You never know if Michelle Bachman et al continue to run their mouth about the Obama Acorn "Census conspiracy", a lot of the folks in red states may not respond.. the law of unintended consequences...

From what I'm seeing, they may be looking at a Supreme Court ruling at some point regarding censuses...whether to include or exclude illegals and/or people who refuse to respond to the surveys and workers' visits.

California could by all means gain four instead of losing one seat with the force of the illegals...New York and Massachusetts maybe stay the same.

Stokes 09-01-2009 11:55 AM

Re: 2010 census looking not so good...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by efin98 (Post 1480246)
From what I'm seeing, they may be looking at a Supreme Court ruling at some point regarding censuses...whether to include or exclude illegals and/or people who refuse to respond to the surveys and workers' visits.

California could by all means gain four instead of losing one seat with the force of the illegals...New York and Massachusetts maybe stay the same.

Should illegal numbers affect representation in Congress if they're not allowed to vote? I could understand (but disagree with) the idea that you have to know how many are in the state to estimate costs, but there's no reason I can see to include them in a head count for # of reps.

Fogbuster 09-01-2009 11:57 AM

Re: 2010 census looking not so good...
 
All those southern states are the first stop for the tens of thousands of illegals that sneak into America each month.

Great. Give all those states the extra seats, take 'em away from the northeast bastion of liberal wonk wankers, ... but-t-t-t in order for people to vote, they MUST pass a strict English language test; no pass, no vote, PERIOD. To hell with all this "bi-lingual" education crap. Do they have "bi-lingual" education in Mexico??? In Nicaragua??? in Venezuela??? Nahh, didn't think so. Speak English well, be legal, or NO VOTE. And if you ain't legal, send you back, C.O.D.



//

PatriotsReign 09-01-2009 01:35 PM

Re: 2010 census looking not so good...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by efin98 (Post 1480246)
From what I'm seeing, they may be looking at a Supreme Court ruling at some point regarding censuses...whether to include or exclude illegals and/or people who refuse to respond to the surveys and workers' visits.

California could by all means gain four instead of losing one seat with the force of the illegals...New York and Massachusetts maybe stay the same.

Illegals can't be counted in any US census...nor should they be. Representation in congress is determined by the number os US CITIZENS in their districts. Illegals don't count in many ways. They don't count in determining gov't representation AND they don't count as far as policy. In other words, it would be unconstitutional for any law to be passed that would help illegals with our tax dollars.

Once again, that's the way it should be.

DarrylS 09-01-2009 01:38 PM

Re: 2010 census looking not so good...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PatriotsReign (Post 1480415)
Illegals can't be counted in any US census...nor should they be. Representation in congress is determined by the number os US CITIZENS in their districts. Illegals don't count in many ways. They don't count in determining gov't representation AND they don't count as far as policy. In other words, it would be unconstitutional for any law to be passed that would help illegals with our tax dollars.

Once again, that's the way it should be.

I suspect that the talk about including illegals is just a talking point, from a constitutional point of view and from a illegal point of view, Michelle Bachman started some of the hysteria when she whined about how there is no question on it regarding resident status.... most illegals do not want to fill out personal information about themselves and their situation.

efin98 09-01-2009 01:55 PM

Re: 2010 census looking not so good...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by PatriotsReign (Post 1480415)
Illegals can't be counted in any US census...nor should they be. Representation in congress is determined by the number os US CITIZENS in their districts. Illegals don't count in many ways. They don't count in determining gov't representation AND they don't count as far as policy. In other words, it would be unconstitutional for any law to be passed that would help illegals with our tax dollars.

Once again, that's the way it should be.

That is your interpretation of how things MAY be...but it's not you who will make that determination, it's the nine justices in Washington who eventually will.

Stokes 09-01-2009 07:12 PM

Re: 2010 census looking not so good...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by efin98 (Post 1480436)
That is your interpretation of how things MAY be...but it's not you who will make that determination, it's the nine justices in Washington who eventually will.

But how could there be any legal justification? That case would be 9-0 against I suspect. There is simply no way the Constitution allows for changing representation in Congress in order to account for people who do not vote and should have no representation in Congress, right?

sdaniels7114 09-01-2009 07:19 PM

Re: 2010 census looking not so good...
 
The Constitution mentions people, not citizens. Specifically it says 'free people' but that's in reference to slaves counting as 3/5's of a person for enumeration purposes. They do exempt untaxed Indians in the document, maybe illegals would be considered Indians today; but they do say untaxed Indians and nobody escapes all taxes.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC