![]() |
Defensive Backfield
Did everybody realize, what I just realized recently:
Excluding Springs, who is on the bubble to even make the team, if you believe what you read, the oldest DB on the team is currently only 27 years old (Boddin). That, to me bodes very well for the future. We seem to have a bunch of not only talented players, but young talented players in the defensive backfield. Thoughts? |
Re: Defensive Backfield
DBs should be vastly better than last year. Age does not mean what it used to with free agency, because if DBs develop into pro-bowl caliber players, we cannot afford them (Law, Samuel). If talented, as at least willhite, Butler, Meriweather and Chung seem to be, they are a great value while they are young.
|
Re: Defensive Backfield
Quote:
What makes you think that Springs is on the bubble to make the team??? |
Quote:
|
Re: Defensive Backfield
Quote:
How can you "Look one hit from a physical breakdown"? |
Re: Defensive Backfield
Quote:
|
Re: Defensive Backfield
Quote:
|
Re: Defensive Backfield
Quote:
Springs got a $2.7 mil signing bonus and has not played poorly. Why in the world would he be cut? |
Re: Defensive Backfield
Quote:
|
Re: Defensive Backfield
I don't think Springs is on the bubble. But, as the OP points out, our other DBs are all 27 or under. And, many of them are signed for the next 3+ years:
S Meriweather - 25; signed through 2011 S Chung - 22; not sure about the duration of his contract S Sanders - will be 26 in November; signed through 2011 S McGowan - will be 26 in September; signed through 2010 CB Butler - 23; signed through 2012 CB Bodden - will be 28 in September; signed through 2009 CB Wheatley - 24; signed through 2011 CB Wilhite - 25; signed through 2011 That's potentially the nucleus of a great defensive backfield, most of them signed through 2011, with only Bodden a FA after this year. After all of of the turnover and disruption of the past few years, having a nucleus of talented young DBs signed for a 3 year period would be phenomenal. That's part of why I could see potentially extending Bodden early if he looks to be worth keeping. Just like the FO seems to be locking down a good bit of the OL early, having the secondary be a non-issue for the offseason would be a breath of fresh air. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.