New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   Political Discussion (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/12/political-discussion.html)
-   -   Our Sinking Welfare State (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/12/247287-our-sinking-welfare-state.html)

State 06-22-2009 02:07 PM

Our Sinking Welfare State
 
Some ominous statistics by Robert Samuleson: Our Sinking Welfare State

Read the whole thing.

Real World 06-22-2009 06:47 PM

Re: Our Sinking Welfare State
 
Interesting figures.

Quote:

Since 1960, government has changed radically. Then, 52 percent of federal spending went for defense, 26 percent for "payments for individuals" -- the welfare state. By 2008, 61 percent consisted of "payments for individuals," 21 percent for defense.

State 06-22-2009 06:48 PM

Re: Our Sinking Welfare State
 
That's the one that stood out to me, too.

State 06-28-2009 01:33 PM

Re: Our Sinking Welfare State
 
Not many people realize how truly desperate California's fiscal plight is.

Pat Buchanan writes about it: California Nightmares.

The bills eventually come due. There is no free lunch...even for a state as rich and diverse as the Left Coast behemoth.

BelichickFan 06-28-2009 02:30 PM

Re: Our Sinking Welfare State
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by State (Post 1417548)
Not many people realize how truly desperate California's fiscal plight is.

Pat Buchanan writes about it: California Nightmares.

The bills eventually come due. There is no free lunch...even for a state as rich and diverse as the Left Coast behemoth.

I'm stuck here for 14 years until I can retire . . . start cutting, boys, we aren't voting for more tax increases no matter how often Holy Diver tries to vote :) We'll get there as a country sometime too, and obama seems to be accelerating that process. As Buchanan suggested, diversity is overrated - what we need is not diversity but responsibility - both from government and the individual but we are moving far away from that; now anyone who fails doesn't take responsibility they blame the rich, the big business or the government.

Patters 06-28-2009 04:07 PM

Re: Our Sinking Welfare State
 
Samuelson points out that neither government nor private enterprise can address the problem. Private enterprise has been cutting back benefits whereever it can -- with health insurance, 401K contributions, etc.

We need to remodel our economy in some way. That is what Obama is attempting. If he does not succeed, perhaps the conservatives will have a shot at it.

State 06-28-2009 04:35 PM

Re: Our Sinking Welfare State
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Patters (Post 1417601)
Samuelson points out that neither government nor private enterprise can address the problem. Private enterprise has been cutting back benefits whereever it can -- with health insurance, 401K contributions, etc.

We need to remodel our economy in some way. That is what Obama is attempting. If he does not succeed, perhaps the conservatives will have a shot at it.

Obama has never met a payroll. As George Will memorably wrote, he hasn't run so much as a Dairy Queen.

His ambitious proposals create uncertainty, which recent scholars are emphasizing as a main contribution to the weakness of FDR's New Deal. Regime Uncertainty in 1937 and 2008 | The Beacon

Your premise that he can "remake" an economy like it's an army to be commanded and controlled is a curious fallacy that's all-too-prevalent among people who don't understand economics very well. The economy, after all, is a collection of free choice we 300+ million Americans make every day dozens of times.

Socialism doesn't take into account those choices by not allowing the pricing system to work naturally. (Prices under socialism are by its very nature meaningless.)

Patters, ever thought of reading Jonah Goldberg's Liberal Fascism? Or Amity Shlaes's Forgotten Man? The former shows the New Deal's Blue Eagle, totally fascistic. The latter demonstrates conclusively to my mind that the New Deal did not end the Great Depression. (1937 was nearly as bad as 1933.)

sdaniels7114 06-28-2009 08:11 PM

Re: Our Sinking Welfare State
 
Employment in 1937 was at pre-depression levels. What sent the nation back into a tailspin was cutting the New Deal back before the changes had taken root.

Lets not forget the nation tried it the conservative way(do nothing Hoover) from the crash in '29 until Roosevelt was sworn in in January of '33. Things happened under Roosevelt, under Hoover we got nothing

ljuneau 06-28-2009 10:20 PM

Re: Our Sinking Welfare State
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by sdaniels7114 (Post 1417695)
Employment in 1937 was at pre-depression levels. What sent the nation back into a tailspin was cutting the New Deal back before the changes had taken root.

Lets not forget the nation tried it the conservative way(do nothing Hoover) from the crash in '29 until Roosevelt was sworn in in January of '33. Things happened under Roosevelt, under Hoover we got nothing

See Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act

Quote:

The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act (sometimes known as the Hawley-Smoot Tariff Act; officially the Tariff Act of 1930)[1] was an act signed into law on June 17, 1930, that raised U.S. tariffs on over 20,000 imported goods to record levels. In the United States 1,028 economists signed a petition against this legislation, and after it was passed, many countries retaliated with their own increased tariffs on U.S. goods, and American exports and imports were reduced by more than half. [2]

Many economists, historians, and government officials have determined that the act was a contributing factor to the severity of the Great Depression.[3]
Although thousands of economists and business leaders begged Hoover to veto the bill, he signed it.

Like your second sentence, your first is just as inaccurate and has been addressed in many previous threads.

I would suggest you read the two books suggested by State in a previous thread. I've read both and they are excellent.

Patters 06-28-2009 10:26 PM

Re: Our Sinking Welfare State
 
This revisionism is tiresome, and ironic considering that Reagan deficit spent to the tune of $500 billion to get out of Carter's recession. The Repubican policies brought us the Great Depression, and Democratic policies ended it. They still can't live that down. They choose to ignore the inconvenient fact that Truman (D) came after FDR.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC