New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/patsfans-com-patriots-fan-forum.html)
-   -   The future of the Patriots 'D' and the 3-4 tipping point (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/240182-future-patriots-d-3-4-tipping-point.html)

livinginthe past 05-20-2009 06:57 AM

The future of the Patriots 'D' and the 3-4 tipping point
 
One of the storylines of the draft was the teams making the transition to the 3-4 defense - Denver, Green Bay etc.

Bill Belichick is a guy who obviously regards himself as someone who is 'ahead of the curve'.

This makes me wonder when the Patriots will move away from the 3-4 and back to a 4-3 formation - or maybe something more (r)evolutionary.

Teams like Pittsburgh and New England made a killing in the early part of this decade at draft time - being able to select so-called 'tweeners' for their OLB position in later rounds - due to the fact 4-3 teams didn't value them so highly.

Now we see a shift on 2 fronts - opposition offenses figuring out the 3-4 and more teams moving to the 3-4 - the latter will surely only hasten the former.

When does the 'tipping point' arrive whereby its more beneficial, and better value, to draft/recruit guys who fit the 4-3 better than the 3-4 - 2010, 2011?

As noted by many draft day prognosticators - there are only so many 3-4 NT tackles out there.

I realise that there is more than just a single 3-4 defence and that different guys suit different schemes better but, looking ahead, the playing field and talent base are going to become more stretched as time goes by.

Any thoughts?

maverick4 05-20-2009 07:27 AM

Re: The future of the Patriots 'D' and the 3-4 tipping point
 
There are too many teams who continue to use the 4-3 and will for the future.
There wouldn't be a shift to becoming a 4-3 team, but more teams using 3-4 will remove the draft or FA advantage they used to enjoy, but it won't be a disadvantage.

Pats726 05-20-2009 07:59 AM

Re: The future of the Patriots 'D' and the 3-4 tipping point
 
The team has more players that are suited for 3-4 defense...so it will be the base for teh future..will they use MORE 4-3?? maybe...maybe the big nickel 3 safeties?? possibly...who knows...

ivanfears 05-20-2009 08:18 AM

Re: The future of the Patriots 'D' and the 3-4 tipping point
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pats726 (Post 1387509)
The team has more players that are suited for 3-4 defense...so it will be the base for teh future..will they use MORE 4-3?? maybe...maybe the big nickel 3 safeties?? possibly...who knows...

anything would be better than that defense last year, horrible in red zone, and third down , come to think of it it was that defense that couldnt stop the giants in 07, and really was soft coming down the strech in 07, ie eagles,ravens and giant regular season games, and go back to 06 that defense cost us another superbowl when they couldnt stop manning and the colts, over all that defense the last 3 years has not been something to be proud of, something has to change

Spiral 05-20-2009 08:40 AM

Re: The future of the Patriots 'D' and the 3-4 tipping point
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by livinginthe past (Post 1387473)
Teams like Pittsburgh and New England made a killing in the early part of this decade at draft time - being able to select so-called 'tweeners' for their OLB position in later rounds - due to the fact 4-3 teams didn't value them so highly.

I know this sounds like it should be true, but how many of these type players have the Patriots actually drafted since BB became coach? I can think of TBC, who I don't think the Patriots make a killing on. Who else?

Pat the Pats Fan 05-20-2009 08:41 AM

Re: The future of the Patriots 'D' and the 3-4 tipping point
 
The Pat's D will continue to rebuild and evolve. It has to. I for one look positively at the current defense, but time and the season will tell.

It's a shame, but the defense has had one key negative game in each of the last three years that cost them dearly.
1. Unable to close out the Colts in '06 AFCCG. Couldn't go to SB
2. Unable to stop Giants in '07 SB. Cost them a moment in history
3. Unable to stop Jets in OT game in '08. Cost them the division and a playoff berth.

jmt57 05-20-2009 09:03 AM

Re: The future of the Patriots 'D' and the 3-4 tipping point
 
I think one thing to keep an eye on with the talks of extending the regular season schedule is the possibility of expanding the size of the roster as well. That to me could be a catalyst for a change in philosophy of the defense.

Due to the current size of the roster, Bill Belichick places a premium on versatility - specifically players who can fill more than one role or can play multiple positions. Expand the roster size and I could see a shift to more specialists, which could lead to more sub packages designed either for a specific down and distance, or for a specific team and the type of offense they run.

That may not be the tipping point that signals the end of the 3-4 based defense, but it could alter the defensive formations that we see in any given game in the near future.

pats_premi 05-20-2009 09:14 AM

Re: The future of the Patriots 'D' and the 3-4 tipping point
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ivanfears (Post 1387510)
anything would be better than that defense last year, horrible in red zone, and third down , come to think of it it was that defense that couldnt stop the giants in 07, and really was soft coming down the strech in 07, ie eagles,ravens and giant regular season games, and go back to 06 that defense cost us another superbowl when they couldnt stop manning and the colts, over all that defense the last 3 years has not been something to be proud of, something has to change

I was thinking of the same thing. As a Patriot's fan it is hard to admit that BB's defense can be this bad.

RayClay 05-20-2009 09:20 AM

Re: The future of the Patriots 'D' and the 3-4 tipping point
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Spiral (Post 1387520)
I know this sounds like it should be true, but how many of these type players have the Patriots actually drafted since BB became coach? I can think of TBC, who I don't think the Patriots make a killing on. Who else?

They haven't.

They have a great nose tackle, which is really what you need for a 3-4.

The DE/OLB tweener picked up on the cheap and converted to successful starter is a myth. Woods would be the first. All the players who have started at linebacker have been third, second and first round picks, except Colvin, who we acquired after two 10.5 sack seasons.

Some have been college linebackers, some played both in college and some were converted to LB in the NFL.

You draft or acquire them same as any other position. I think the discipline is the hardest part, as college LBs in a 4-3 chase plays, while we train players to never chase a play.

Career LBs like Phifer and Seau have adapted. I think young players want to go after tackles and would therefore struggle.

Box_O_Rocks 05-20-2009 09:54 AM

Re: The future of the Patriots 'D' and the 3-4 tipping point
 
I see no drift away from the current base 3-4 and no reason to expect one in the near term.

With the addition of Brace and Prior, plus reports claiming Wilfork is happy with the pace and scope of the negotiations to date, it would appear the Pats' NT issues were carefully considered and have been addressed for the near term.

The strength of the DL pool and the questions surrounding the LBs has once again fooled some into seeing a base 4-3 in NE's future. BB has shown time and time again that he puts a great deal of emphasis on building his D-line "first," and this offseason reflects no change in that philosophy. The number of teams moving to a base 3-4 may have one effect on this preseason, with the strength at the back of the DL roster, I wouldn't be surprised to see at least one trade to grab one of NE's castoffs 'before' they hit the waiver wire.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566