New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   Patriots Draft Talk (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/13/patriots-draft-talk.html)
-   -   Who Would Likely Help Us Most in 2009? (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/13/225498-who-would-likely-help-us-most-2009-a.html)

mgteich 03-24-2009 10:35 AM

Who Would Likely Help Us Most in 2009?
 
It would seem that at least one Day One pick could be used for a player that projects to help us a lot in 2009. There are plenty of picks that will be focused on the future.

Who would you put on the list to help us win the Super Bowl THIS YEAR / Of course, this player would also help us in the future since he would have a 4-6 year contract.

For example, even if we pick Barwin at 34, we still might pick Matthews or Laurinitis or Maualuga (not my choice) at 23 or trade up for Brown or Orapko.

I would hate for us to have no focus on the 2009 season.

My focus is on linebacker because I believe that a linebacker who is ready could even start. We have starters all but set at all the other positions on both offense and defense.

BelichickFan 03-24-2009 10:43 AM

Re: Who Would Likely Help Us Most in 2009?
 
I think it's Maualuga or one of the OT. We could upgrade over Kaczur. We also could find a place for an ILB to have a noticeable role with Bruschi/Guyton.

The OLB are interesting in a pass rush role but I'd like to think Crable could also be ready for that (if not there's a problem there) and I doubt a rookie switching positions would be more than a pass rusher at OLB as a rookie.

bakes781 03-24-2009 10:54 AM

Re: Who Would Likely Help Us Most in 2009?
 
The easiest position to transfer immediately from the college game to the Pros is RB. So a guy like Knowshon could have an immediate impact on this team, but then again potentially so could a Rashad Jennings in the 3rd.

If you're soley looking at OLB, then I'd say Clint Sintim is the closest to being NFL ready since he's played the position.

Sicilian 03-24-2009 10:57 AM

Re: Who Would Likely Help Us Most in 2009?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BelichickFan (Post 1326860)
I think it's Maualuga or one of the OT. We could upgrade over Kaczur. We also could find a place for an ILB to have a noticeable role with Bruschi/Guyton.

The OLB are interesting in a pass rush role but I'd like to think Crable could also be ready for that (if not there's a problem there) and I doubt a rookie switching positions would be more than a pass rusher at OLB as a rookie.

Crable, ideally, could be a big contributor on third downs. I know he played against scrubs in preseason for the most part, but he seemed to have some instincts for both pass rush and pass coverage. If he's healthy and bulked up a bit, I think he'll contribute.

As for the draft question, I think you're right about the OT, if for no other reason than, IMO, linemen (both O and D) tend to be able to start sooner than other positions in the NFL.

mayoclinic 03-24-2009 11:34 AM

Re: Who Would Likely Help Us Most in 2009?
 
I don't think we want to think in terms of a rookie helping us in 2009. I think we draft for the long term. BB has clearly gone to great pains to fill holes in FA such that we specifically don't need any holes to be filled in the draft.

Consider our current roster at the different positions:

QB - no room for a rookie here.
RB - no room for a rookie here.
WR - no real room for a rookie here. Possible a more pro-ready player like Nicks could make a difference, or a situational player like Harvin, but in all likelihood they wouldn't break the starting lineup.
TE - no real room for a rookie here.
OT - no real room for a rookie here, in terms of starting. Kaczur could be upgraded at RT by someone like Smith or Oher, or possibly Britton. Beatty is likely to be a pure LT and only a backup for 2009.
DT - no real room for a rookie here, except as a backup to Wilfork.
DE - no real starting room here. Seymour and Warren are the starters. Great potential after 2009 if Seymour leaves.
OLB - potential for a situation pass rusher to make an impact here.
ILB - potential here to break the lineup with Bruschi aging fast, unless Guyton steps up.
S - probably won't start in 2009, but potential here to get significant playing time and possibly become a starter in 2010.
CB - no real room for a rookie here.

Revman 03-24-2009 02:49 PM

Re: Who Would Likely Help Us Most in 2009?
 
Here are the players that would help the most right away:

1. Maualuga- ILB- Could start from day one. Would be a true run stuffer to grow with Mayo.

2. Alex Mack- Ctr- The only NFL ready interior lineman. He could start from camp, like Mayo, and contribute without a dip in o-line protection.

3. Sherrod Martin-cb-Troy- Will improve cb depth, eventually start. I am really stepping out on a limb here. You will remember this pick later. Probable Round 2-3 pick for Pat's.

patchick 03-24-2009 04:09 PM

Re: Who Would Likely Help Us Most in 2009?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Revman (Post 1327104)
2. Alex Mack- Ctr- The only NFL ready interior lineman. He could start from camp, like Mayo, and contribute without a dip in o-line protection.

Actually, I think C/OG has as much NFL-ready talen as any position in the draft. (I like Eric Wood in particular.) And I'd call that my #2 target for likely impact in 2009 -- a day-1 pick could dramatically improve the depth behind all three interior OLs.

#1 for 2009 impact: safety. Delmas, Chung, Moore, probably Johnson & Vaughn, possibly Hamlin could make an impact on the 2009 backfield.

DW Toys 03-24-2009 04:15 PM

Re: Who Would Likely Help Us Most in 2009?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mayoclinic (Post 1326897)
I don't think we want to think in terms of a rookie helping us in 2009. I think we draft for the long term. BB has clearly gone to great pains to fill holes in FA such that we specifically don't need any holes to be filled in the draft.

Consider our current roster at the different positions:

QB - no room for a rookie here.
RB - no room for a rookie here.
WR - no real room for a rookie here. Possible a more pro-ready player like Nicks could make a difference, or a situational player like Harvin, but in all likelihood they wouldn't break the starting lineup.
TE - no real room for a rookie here.
OT - no real room for a rookie here, in terms of starting. Kaczur could be upgraded at RT by someone like Smith or Oher, or possibly Britton. Beatty is likely to be a pure LT and only a backup for 2009.
DT - no real room for a rookie here, except as a backup to Wilfork.
DE - no real starting room here. Seymour and Warren are the starters. Great potential after 2009 if Seymour leaves.
OLB - potential for a situation pass rusher to make an impact here.
ILB - potential here to break the lineup with Bruschi aging fast, unless Guyton steps up.
S - probably won't start in 2009, but potential here to get significant playing time and possibly become a starter in 2010.
CB - no real room for a rookie here.

Good assessment. Nice job. I think there are some who could help. I am not saying they are binkies, just feel they could help in 2009. I think TE could be a spot that could get a rookie some PT. Baker is slow and Watson is fast and cannot catch. Thomas is on the bubble and after the Colts game in the BB doghouse it would appear. I like James Casey. This is a copy cat league. The success of Dallas Clark, Whitten and Cooley spread out to almost a slot position would work well for Brady. This kid has got hands and decent speed. We do not have that TE on our roster.
I don't know how I feel about Maualuga but I think he has a chance to start or take some time from Teddy in a rotation with Guyton? He is the stuffer. Mayo was great but could be pushed head on.
No if we do not get Peppers or Taylor, I think it could be a good move to consider Michael Johnson of GT in that role.
Safety will have some playing time for a pick. I like Delmas and if we pick him I think he starts at some time during 2009 but I think that William Moore is going to be picked by the Pats. I feel that more than any other pick. But the dark horse someone else mentioned yesterday was Jason Williams, Western Illinois
Ht - 6-3, Wt - 235, 40 - 4.49
Had a great pro day. Impressed scouts with his speed and 26 reps on the bench press.
Dropped back in coverage well. Can cover. Decent hips. Knock you out hitter.
The dark horse is this dude as SS. He faster than most of our DBs. Played some Safety at WIU. Maybe the top three SS prospect in the draft as far as speed goes.
DW Toys

JoeShmoe 03-24-2009 04:26 PM

Re: Who Would Likely Help Us Most in 2009?
 
Who would help us most?

An OT and an OG - because if we lose Neal, Mankins and Light then we probably lose Brady

patsfan13 03-24-2009 05:18 PM

Re: Who Would Likely Help Us Most in 2009?
 
A couple of rookies at LB and Safety who could make an impact on our poor coverage teams from last year.

Don't see any rookies starting next year.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566