![]() |
draft tek mock that includes comps
23 - aaron maybin
34 - ron brace....still on the board:english,sean smith, barwin 47 - william beatty 58 - louis delmas 89 - ILB gerald mcrath 97 - TE travis beckum.....cornelius ingram taken with next pick 124 - C AQ shipley....SS courtney greene still on the board some good and bad in there.....I really like the maybin,beatty, and delmas picks..........the rest I would do as follows: replace brace with jarron gilbert, clint sintim, or sean smith(barwin need goes down if we got maybin in round 1) replace mcrath with alex magee if we didnt get gilbert.....otherwise replace him with I have a feeling the pats will be trading their own 3rd rounder to move an earlier pick up to get someone the will have targeted....... |
Re: draft tek mock that includes comps
Quote:
|
Re: draft tek mock that includes comps
Quote:
Maybin is young so I think that his upside is the reason for this pick as the kid does have skills. Brace is good but I would rather Sean Smith to fill a bigger need as we went with more of a wild card at #23. Beatty at #47 is great value and being able to get Cornelius Ingram with a comp pick would not hurt. I think the longer he has to recover from his injury the better he will be. I really think by the start of the NFL season in 09 this guy is going to be ready to make his mark. Overall I would not be that upset with this draft but there is always room for improvement, but that is why we are here:D |
Re: draft tek mock that includes comps
Quote:
|
Re: draft tek mock that includes comps
Quote:
I'll take Barwin over Ron Brace at 34. With Barwin/Beatty/Delmas at 34, 47, and 58 I'd be in 7th heaven, though I can't believe it would actually happen. Which leaves 23, plus a possible trade-up using #89. Who is available from 20 on up? (I'm at work and for some reason their site is blocked for me right now, so I can't see their actual draft). I would consider Maualuga or Robert Ayers, if they were available in that range. I'm not a Tyson Jackson fan, but many would consider him good value as well. My dream would be B.J. Raji, but there's no way he would fall to within trade-up range without cannabalizing the rest of our draft. |
Re: draft tek mock that includes comps
Quote:
I think it's an even better bet they'll move a pick or two for a first rounder next year and still get the talent needed for this year. See Mayo deal. |
Re: draft tek mock that includes comps
Quote:
I believe the targeting of specific players is the priority.......and when that don't happen, then they try to leverage value in future drafts......... this year stands to be a good year for both since some serious talent stands to be there in round 2.......if the ones the pats want are their, they they go get 'em.......if not, then they parlay to the following year |
Re: draft tek mock that includes comps
Good players-though I do not think Beatty and Delmas will be around. I like Mcrath near rd 4-5.I think Beckum will go sooner. Don't forget-I still believe that Peppers or J. Taylor will be in New England soon. If Peppers is targeted and signed like I think-Pats will offer #34 and another pick. Panthers do not own a number one this year. For them #34 is a rd 1 selection. I do believe the Pats will move #34 regardless. Value-many clubs will want #34 to land in essence a late rd one player that could start. Possiblity-Josh Freeman- Connor Barwin-Kenny Britt-etc. Pat's can acquire a round one pick in 2010 for the 34th pick-They have dealt this way before.Or swap picks and receive another 5.
|
Re: draft tek mock that includes comps
Quote:
Lots of chips, lots of options no doubt. They could even draft with 2010 in mind more than we think they will by taking a top five DE, NT or TE. Tyson Jackson could be the player they move up for to address one of those possible needs in 2010. Ingram or Cook could be had later to set up the TE spot and Brace is another possibility as you point out. |
Re: draft tek mock that includes comps
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.