New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/patsfans-com-patriots-fan-forum.html)
-   -   More Belichick, Patriots in the NFP (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/223044-more-belichick-patriots-nfp.html)

JSn 03-11-2009 08:48 AM

More Belichick, Patriots in the NFP
 
Some more nice insight into Bill and our Pats.

The National Football Post | Diner Morning News

Excerpt:

Quote:

The Patriots have a complete team ready to compete in the NFL before the draft. I always felt that you had to attempt to cover your team needs before the draft so that you could enter the draft with the intention of taking the best player. Having the ability to be flexible in the draft allows you to just pick players and not have to worry about waiting for a certain player. The best drafts normally come from having the best offseasons. You enter the draft room with a sense of peace and know that if the chips don’t fall your way, your team can still go out and compete.

Now, I know this sounds elementary and you’re probably asking, “Don’t all NFL teams try to do this?” The answer is a big NO. Many teams don’t want to sign a veteran player at a position of draft need because they fear the coaches will not play the rookie and will end up playing the rundown veteran. Unless the head coach dictates who will play and when they play, this problem will always be a part of many organizations. In New England, for example, there’s only one person who determines who gets on the field, and if the veteran is better than the rookie, he plays. If the rookie is best, he will play. New England’s way of handling the manipulation of personnel is not the norm in the NFL. New England’s football operation runs like a paramilitary organization while many other teams take the “committee approach.” Everyone knows how I feel about the committee approach.

NEGoldenAge 03-11-2009 09:00 AM

Re: More Belichick, Patriots in the NFP
 
It's a good read. It would have been better if it had mentioned that even with one guy running the show, it's difficult to find FA's for all your needs that will join your team for what you think they are worth. I also think it would be worth mentioning that, in the case of the Pats, two major factors are winning and the culture of the locker room and organization that can coax some players to accept going there for less than they might get elsewhere.... tho I wonder if that is enough to balance the crappy weather and high taxes.

Mack Herron 03-11-2009 09:03 AM

Re: More Belichick, Patriots in the NFP
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JSn (Post 1312874)
The Patriots have a complete team ready to compete in the NFL before the draft.

Excerpt:

Nice, but a couple of positions are still ? at the moment (OLB=Woods, SS=Sanders)

JR4 03-11-2009 09:09 AM

Re: More Belichick, Patriots in the NFP
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mack Herron (Post 1312892)
Nice, but a couple of positions are still ? at the moment (OLB=Woods, SS=Sanders)

Didn't they sign James Sanders?

BelichickFan 03-11-2009 09:13 AM

Re: More Belichick, Patriots in the NFP
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JR4 (Post 1312897)
Didn't they sign James Sanders?

I'm guessing he meant that he thinks Sanders is more backup than starter. I'm not the world's biggest Sanders fan but he's alright. Vrabel's old spot and probably Gaffney's are still up for grabs IMO. Woods played alright with Thomas out so I think we can get by that way. Same with Lewis at WR. For now they're JAGs though, I would say that we aren't "set" at those positions unless we signed, say, Taylor and Galloway. As it stands we should have some competition there. The main point, though, is our holes are insignificant enough that we can look to BPA and development of players at upcoming FA positions (like DL) in the draft.

mayoclinic 03-11-2009 09:13 AM

Re: More Belichick, Patriots in the NFP
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JR4 (Post 1312897)
Didn't they sign James Sanders?

Yes. I believe the poster means that Woods and Sanders are both upgradeable at their positions, which is true. But both are serviceable starters at worst, and excellent rotational guys. Sanders was essentially our starting FS all of last year, so there's at least no real dropoff there from 2008. Woods was a part-time starter and was adequate at the very least.

I see both positions being upgraded long term through the draft, and possibly OLB through FA (Taylor).

There is certainly plenty of room to improve the team. But we essentially have a complete team in place going into the draft, so whatever we pick up will essentially be gravy. No gaping holes to fill. I'm not sure any other team can say that, and no other team is as stacked as we are going into a very deep draft.

Mack Herron 03-11-2009 09:33 AM

Re: More Belichick, Patriots in the NFP
 
The defense needs playmakers to replace Vrabel and Harrison. Neither Sanders nor Woods yet qualify (and in Sanders I don't see a big up side). There is some competition at OLB with Crable, Redd, but nothing else at SS. I hope both positions will be addressed before TC, either through draft and/or FA signings of late cuts.

DW Toys 03-11-2009 10:00 AM

Re: More Belichick, Patriots in the NFP
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mack Herron (Post 1312913)
The defense needs playmakers to replace Vrabel and Harrison. Neither Sanders nor Woods yet qualify (and in Sanders I don't see a big up side). There is some competition at OLB with Crable, Redd, but nothing else at SS. I hope both positions will be addressed before TC, either through draft and/or FA signings of late cuts.

Good post.....now duck!
DW Toys

patsfaninpittsburgh 03-11-2009 10:07 AM

Re: More Belichick, Patriots in the NFP
 
We will have 5 or 6 picks this year in the first 3 rounds. That might help get us some playmakers.

Also, Crable and Wheatley should be very interesting this year.

Also, the best defense is a good offense. Maybe what's his name... oh yeah, Brady can help.

Lloyd_Christmas 03-11-2009 10:28 AM

Re: More Belichick, Patriots in the NFP
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mack Herron (Post 1312892)
Nice, but a couple of positions are still ? at the moment (OLB=Woods, SS=Sanders)

Don't we have A.Thomas, TBC, Colvin, Crable, and Rudd at OLB in addition to Woods? Or are any of those projected to play ILB?

I'm not saying we shouldn't draft an OLB... in fact, I'd like to see us draft at least one good player at OLB and ILB... I'm just saying that we are not paper thin at OLB.

That was the premise of the OP... we are going into the draft being able to draft the best player available because we are not critically thin at any position.

At safety, we have Meriweather and Sanders starting with (presumably) Harrison as a backup along with the possibility of moving Springs to Safety if needed. There are also plenty of servicable, even if not flashy, safeties available in FA.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566