![]() |
The Receiver Poll
Simple: one of seven options RIGHT NOW.
If you pick "other" or "draft" tell us who you're thinking of. |
Re: The Receiver Poll
Galloway still has something left in the tank, and he would represent the best value out of those 7. If he wants to sign a small 2 year contract, he would be better in that role than Stallworth was.
|
Re: The Receiver Poll
I'm in the Galloway camp myself, followed by Harrison.
For anyone needing a refresher on Joey: YouTube - Joey Galloway Holt is intriguing, but not until he gets released. |
Re: The Receiver Poll
Draft:
Hakeen Nicks Darius Heywood-Bey Juaquin Iglesias Kenny Britt Brian Robiske Mike Thomas (you can never have too any Thomases on the team) Kenny McKinley Brandon Gibson Mike Wallace (no, the other one) Quan Cosby Brooks Foster (he must hate his parents) Jeremy Childs D.J. Bolden Jason Cherry Dobson Collins Dominick Goodman Chris Williams Vinny Perretta Dudley Guice |
Re: The Receiver Poll
I picked Galloway but if/when Holt is available for nothing he would be #1 and Galloway #2.
I also expect a WR in the first two rounds of the draft if there's a solid value at one of our picks. |
Re: The Receiver Poll
Mike Furrey
Galloway has good hands and great speed, but below average blocking skills. Harrison has lost a step or two; I'm not convinced his knees are okay. Plus, he refused to take a pay cut with the Colts, which leads me to believe he either wants to make more than a #3 WR is worth to the Pats, or won't play at all. Holt would be intriguing but I'd rather wait till he's cut. Owens should not even be a consideration. The problem with the receivers listed here is that I believe they are all looking for more money than what the Pats want to pay a #3 WR - probably in the vicinity of Gaffney's $1.2 million cap number last year. I could be wrong, that's just my opinion. Therefore a more realistic #3 WR is going to be someone like Furrey, Shaun McDonald, Amani Toomer, Ike Hilliard, Justin McCareins, Marty Booker, Drew Bennett, etc. |
Re: The Receiver Poll
I'd look at cheap alternatives:
Brandon Lloyd - good complementary receiver, productive enough to demand coverage, should be a good blocker DJ Hackett - terrific hands, one drop past two years, gets open, but low productivity Justin McCareins - good deep threat, can help open the middle for Welker and tight ends These guys are sort of comparable to Gaffney, but should be cheaper. The Pats need a possession type, good hands, as a third option. If Galloway is cheap, I would consider him in here with those three. |
Re: The Receiver Poll
I like Furrey and Toomer
-Rob- |
Re: The Receiver Poll
And no interest in Harrison, assuming he wants anything more than veteran minimum, which seems unlikely given his refusal to renegotiate with Indy. I just can't see him accepting the role of third guy well, and he has really lost a lot of his ability. The gun charge doesn't excite me. Terrific hands if he comes cheap and would play the third-option possession guy.
Same with TO. The drops concern me, but his constant criticism of the play-calling is really a problem. Especially with a young QB/receiver coaching staff, you don't need that. Even if signed to a one-year, no-bonus deal, he takes a slot that would have to be replaced if he acted up. There's no crying in baseball, and there shouldn't be any in football. |
Re: The Receiver Poll
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.