![]() |
Q: Which Team(s) Consists of Most Draftees
I have a question, does anyone know or has a breakdown of the current percentage/number players on NFL team(s) rosters that were actually drafted by that team. I'm just curious as to which NFL teams contain the most players they actually drafted rather than acquiring players through free agency and trades. Just asking because of a friend of mine was saying how many players for the Steelers were actually drafted by the Steelers and weren't "busts".
|
Re: Q: Which Team(s) Consists of Most Draftees
Before I look for a site that has that information, your friend's logic is invalid. Obviously he is trying to say that building through the draft, and not picking up players via trade or free agenncy is a superior method. Be aware he is probably going to bring up the Pats 2007 draft as "all busts", discounting the additions of Welker and Moss, as proof that Pittsburgh's FO is smart and New England's FO is dumb. Simply counter that with the 2007 picks, the Patriots added Moss, Welker and Mayo to the team.
For one thing, a team could have nothing but drafted players on their roster and finish 0-16. For another thing, a team could be 16-0 with nothing but their own draft picks - but all the starters are from the 3rd round or later, and all the day one picks were cut; yet by his standards that team had no draft busts. He's trying to bait you in to a debate with the deck stacked in his favor, to "prove" the Steelers are "better" than the Patriots. He already knows the Steelers historically use free agents far less than the Pats do. The method of using trades and free agency to accomplish the goal of building a winning roster in the NFL is irrelevant though, because of the salary cap. There is no comparison to major league baseball, where teams with a lot of money like the Yankees (and yes, Red Sox) gain a competitive advantage by outbidding everyone else for free agents and trading with teams that are about to lose a player to free agency. I suggest that you bait him by saying something like 'NFL teams that build teams with trades and free agents are just like the Yankees' and when he gleefully agrees, point out the salary cap. Then ask him why the talent evaluators in Pittsburgh let Mike Vrabel become an unrestricted free agent eight years ago. |
Re: Q: Which Team(s) Consists of Most Draftees
Quote:
|
Re: Q: Which Team(s) Consists of Most Draftees
The only site I found that included how players were acquired was Pro Football Reference, but it is not complete. The blank spaces under "Drafted (tm/rd/yr)" indicate the player was not drafted, but it does not say which team first signed the player, and the 2008 draft appears to be incomplete (e.g., Limas Sweed and Dennis Dixon were drafted by the Steelers last year.) Though it does give a good indication, you have to count the players on each team individually, and there's no distinction between a UDFA that spent his entire career with that team and an undrafted player who was just signed by a team after several years on another team.
Here's a look at the two teams based on their 2008 rosters. Steelers: 26 players drafted by team (corrections made for Dixon and Sweed) 12 players drafted by other teams 15 players undrafted Patriots: 20 players drafted by team 15 players drafted by other teams 18 players undrafted Not as big a difference as I would have expected, given the perception from other fans and the media. |
Re: Q: Which Team(s) Consists of Most Draftees
Now I'm curious, so here are all the teams with the number of players that they drafted themselves on their roster.
23 - Arizona 19 - Atlanta 24 - Baltimore 20 - Buffalo 24 - Carolina 26 - Chicago 18 - Cincinnati 15 - Cleveland 26 - Dallas 17 - Denver 20 - Detroit 28 - Green Bay 17 - Houston 27 - Indianapolis 26 - Jacksonville 19 - Kansas City 12 - Miami 17 - Minnesota 20 - New England 15 - New Orleans 19 - New York Giants 17 - New York Jets 22 - Oakland 24 - Philadelphia 26 - Pittsburgh 23 - San Diego 27 - San Francisco 22 - Seattle 19 - St. Louis 22 - Tampa Bay 23 - Tennessee 17 - Washington I see no correlation between the number of players that a team drafted on their roster, and how good that team is. Some of the highest numbers include both good teams (Colts, Steelers) and bad teams (49ers, Packers, Jaguars), and some of the lowest numbers also include both playoff teams (Dolphins, Vikings, Giants) and double-digit losers (Bengals, Browns.) The thing is, just because a player is still on the team that drafted him, that doesn't mean he's not a 'bust.' Just look some of the players that Oakland drafted that are still on their roster: Robert Gallery, Michael Huff, Marques Tuiasosopo and Anrew Walter were all drafted in the first three rounds. Bottom line is that just because the Patriots acquire a few more players through trades and free agency than the Steelers do, that doesn't mean the Pats are not as good at evaluating talent. |
Re: Q: Which Team(s) Consists of Most Draftees
Hah thanks man really appreciate it :cool:
|
Re: Q: Which Team(s) Consists of Most Draftees
Quote:
Awesome. I love seeing the Colts so high up there. |
Re: Q: Which Team(s) Consists of Most Draftees
Quote:
I still reserve the right to hate him for a multitude of other offenses. |
Re: Q: Which Team(s) Consists of Most Draftees
Quote:
|
Re: Q: Which Team(s) Consists of Most Draftees
I think the better stat would be how many players drafted are current starters. I know San Diego has to be high on that list along with Pittsburgh
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 © Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties. This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.