New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/patsfans-com-patriots-fan-forum.html)
-   -   I see a conservative game plan from Cassel against Pittsburgh (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/186594-i-see-conservative-game-plan-cassel-against-pittsburgh.html)

PATRIOTSFANINPA 11-24-2008 12:34 PM

I see a conservative game plan from Cassel against Pittsburgh
 
I could see a bit of the old Cassel with the dink and dunk in this weeks huge clash against one of the toughest defenses in the league and arguably the best safety in the NFL in Polamalu

I seriously doubt Cassel sniffs anywhere near 400 yards this week

I think the game plan may very well go back to the conservative approach with Cassel tossing short 5 or 10 yard passes in the slot and some screens as I think it will be tough to go long much at all against thier secondary

If Jordan and Morris both play it could make a difference - I expect whichever runs the ball more effectively will win this game and it should be a LOW scoring affair.

Your thoughts?

lostjumper 11-24-2008 12:37 PM

Re: I see a conservative game plan from Cassel against Pittsburgh
 
I think you are right. I don't see the defense of Pittsburgh giving the pats the 1 on 1 matches on our WR's like we saw in the Miami game. If moss is double covered, that should leave some more running room in the middle.

BelichickFan 11-24-2008 12:37 PM

Re: I see a conservative game plan from Cassel against Pittsburgh
 
Of course he won't throw for 400 but the Patriots tend to come out aggressively against Pittsburgh and there's no reason to think they won't this time. They like to spread them out and make it difficult to send all the blitzers while trying to cover 4-5 WR. Tightening up the offense, running and throwing short actually plays into Pittsburgh's hands.

ctpatsfan77 11-24-2008 12:38 PM

Re: I see a conservative game plan from Cassel against Pittsburgh
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BelichickFan (Post 1177950)
Of course he won't throw for 400 but the Patriots tend to come out aggressively against Pittsburgh and there's no reason to think they won't this time. They like to spread them out and make it difficult to send all the blitzers while trying to cover 4-5 WR. Tightening up the offense, running and throwing short actually plays into Pittsburgh's hands.

The only way the Patriots go conservative is if they need to in order to protect Cassel.

Last year, even with healthy RBs, they basically didn't even try to run the ball in the second half.

Personally, I think Cassel might actually get 400 yards next week. Not likely, but not impossible.

BelichickFan 11-24-2008 12:41 PM

Re: I see a conservative game plan from Cassel against Pittsburgh
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ctpatsfan77 (Post 1177953)
The only way the Patriots go conservative is if they need to in order to protect Cassel.

The Patriots seem to think the best way to protect the QB against Pittsburgh is to go 4-5 wide and force them to keep more players in coverage rather than blitzing. It seems to work in general, I hope we have Light for the game. Faulk is also a key, I don't know what his history is against Pittsburgh but screens work great against blitzing defenses.

wistahpatsfan 11-24-2008 12:42 PM

Re: I see a conservative game plan from Cassel against Pittsburgh
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lostjumper (Post 1177949)
I think you are right. I don't see the defense of Pittsburgh giving the pats the 1 on 1 matches on our WR's like we saw in the Miami game. If moss is double covered, that should leave some more running room in the middle.

Cassel runs for 100yds+:D

Sivy 11-24-2008 12:42 PM

Re: I see a conservative game plan from Cassel against Pittsburgh
 
I see the patriots finally being able to get to the qb consistantly against pit

Rob0729 11-24-2008 12:43 PM

Re: I see a conservative game plan from Cassel against Pittsburgh
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BelichickFan (Post 1177957)
The Patriots seem to think the best way to protect the QB against Pittsburgh is to go 4-5 wide and force them to keep more players in coverage rather than blitzing. It seems to work in general, I hope we have Light for the game. Faulk is also a key, I don't know what his history is against Pittsburgh but screens work great against blitzing defenses.

I agree the best way to attack an agressive defense like the Steelers is to spread them out and attack with a lot screens and slants. You gotta use their aggression against them and make them over pursue on short passes. I think Welker and Faulk both should have big games if the offense is effective.

BelichickFan 11-24-2008 12:47 PM

Re: I see a conservative game plan from Cassel against Pittsburgh
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sivy (Post 1177960)
I see the patriots finally being able to get to the qb consistantly against pit

We'd better, they've allowed 35 sacks in only 334 attempts. As compared to the last two teams, Miami and Jest, who average allowing 21.5 sacks in 353.5 attempts. The Patriots have also allowed 35 sacks but in 375 attempts and most of those sacks were early.

chris_in_sunnyvale 11-24-2008 12:50 PM

Re: I see a conservative game plan from Cassel against Pittsburgh
 
The Pats will open it up against Pittsburgh because they'll have to. Running on the Steelers is an exercise in futility. They probably have the best LB corps in the league.

I hope Matt Light doesn't get suspended. I pity LeVoir or whoever else has to block James Harrison.

On the plus side, Pittsburgh's OL is very shaky at pass protection so the Pats should be able to get to Roethlisberger.

Regards,
Chris


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563