New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com  Patriots Fan Messageboard

New England Patriots Forums - PatsFans.com Patriots Fan Messageboard (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/)
-   PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/patsfans-com-patriots-fan-forum.html)
-   -   Ko Simpson's illegal hit on Moss - "Defensless Reciever?" (http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/179400-ko-simpsons-illegal-hit-moss-defensless-reciever.html)

Shockt327 11-09-2008 03:32 PM

Ko Simpson's illegal hit on Moss - "Defensless Reciever?"
 
On the first drive, Ko Simpson illegally hit Moss helmet to helmet. Dan Dierdorff pointed out that he "hit a defenseless receiver."

What does this "defenseless receiver" rule encompass? Is it just helmet to helmet? Is shoulder to helmet illegal too?

upstater1 11-09-2008 03:46 PM

Re: Ko Simpson's illegal hit on Moss - "Defensless Reciever?"
 
Moss was still coming down after going up in the air for the ball.

You have to let him at least set his feet so that he's not thrashed.

Shockt327 11-09-2008 03:52 PM

Re: Ko Simpson's illegal hit on Moss - "Defensless Reciever?"
 
That's what I thought it was too.

I'm arguing with some idiot who thinks the call is the same as a late hit call. From what I understand, it is illegal to launch yourself into a receiver irregardless of whether or not he catches the ball or it bounces off his hands. Even if Moss caught the ball it would still be a penalty. If Moss had both feet on the ground and was running - then it would be legal.

Ice Cold Bruschi 11-09-2008 03:55 PM

Re: Ko Simpson's illegal hit on Moss - "Defensless Reciever?"
 
Sorry I think that was a chicken ***** call its just further evidence of the pussyfication of the league under goodell. Hits like that used to be how the pats made their bread in the league back in 03-04

TripleOption 11-09-2008 03:58 PM

Re: Ko Simpson's illegal hit on Moss - "Defensless Reciever?"
 
If a ball is clearly not catchable, then a receiver cannot be hit anyway. It falls under the same category as Roughing the Passer and Roughing the Kicker.

patsfaninpa 11-09-2008 04:00 PM

Re: Ko Simpson's illegal hit on Moss - "Defensless Reciever?"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ice Cold Bruschi (Post 1153030)
Sorry I think that was a chicken ***** call its just further evidence of the pussyfication of the league under goodell. Hits like that used to be how the pats made their bread in the league back in 03-04


I feel the same way. Rodney would have another 182 penalties in his career is that
was called all of the time. Not a knock on Rodney. I love the way he plays. Don't
care much for how it's officiated any more.

NYPatsFan 11-09-2008 04:25 PM

Re: Ko Simpson's illegal hit on Moss - "Defensless Reciever?"
 
I thought it was a stupid call. Moss got his hands on the ball and Ko was running full speed at him. It's ridiculous to expect a defender to stop his forward momentum in a split second. Now, if the NFL decides it was a helmet-to-helmet hit then he will be fined. Otherwise, it was a stupid call by the ref.

upstater1 11-09-2008 04:27 PM

Re: Ko Simpson's illegal hit on Moss - "Defensless Reciever?"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ice Cold Bruschi (Post 1153030)
Sorry I think that was a chicken ***** call its just further evidence of the pussyfication of the league under goodell. Hits like that used to be how the pats made their bread in the league back in 03-04

They changed the rule. You can't do that anymore. This rule doesn't bother me. Especially after Tatum-Morgan. WRs who go up for the ball are defenceless.

Batman 11-09-2008 04:28 PM

Re: Ko Simpson's illegal hit on Moss - "Defensless Reciever?"
 
As a DB Hate the rule it turns football in to a boring sport rather than a collision sport. You can't touch a receiver to stop him from catching the ball.

DaBruinz 11-09-2008 04:32 PM

Re: Ko Simpson's illegal hit on Moss - "Defensless Reciever?"
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ice Cold Bruschi (Post 1153030)
Sorry I think that was a chicken ***** call its just further evidence of the pussyfication of the league under goodell. Hits like that used to be how the pats made their bread in the league back in 03-04

1) The Pats back in 03-04 did not hit receivers late and did not launch themselves at receivers while they were still in the air, but without the ball.
2) The Defenseless Receiver rule has been around for a long time.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2

© Copyright 2000-2012. PatsFans.com Is a Partner of USA TODAY Sports Digital Properties.
The opinions posted in this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our staff at PatsFans.com or USA Today.
We are not affiliated with the New England Patriots™ or the NFL™. The Photo Used In the header was taken by Ian Logue.

This site is owned and operated by I&K Internet Design Enterprises, LLC


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563