- Joined
- May 28, 2005
- Messages
- 13,274
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.10 to 40 is a huge drop. I love future #1s - I love them with all my heart - but I think I'd have had to get their #2 this year and their #1 and #2 next year to do that.Another interesting statement made on "All Access" was that New Orleans wanted to trade back into the first round after we traded down from 7 to 10. The way I understood the clip is that they offered us their 2nd in 2008, number 40, and their first in 2009 for number 10. Should the Pats have done it? Who do you think NO was targetting?
Another interesting statement made on "All Access" was that New Orleans wanted to trade back into the first round after we traded down from 7 to 10. The way I understood the clip is that they offered us their 2nd in 2008, number 40, and their first in 2009 for number 10. Should the Pats have done it? Who do you think NO was targetting?
10 to 40 is a huge drop. I love future #1s - I love them with all my heart - but I think I'd have had to get their #2 this year and their #1 and #2 next year to do that.
DRC was the guy they wanted...
If DRC was the guy they wanted, they would have taken him at 10. Its as simple as that.
They wanted Ellis and DRC, what planet are you on? We're talking about the Saints here............They had already made the deal for 7 and called the Pats back up at 10 and offered their #1 next year and #40 in 08, DRC WAS THE GUY THEY WANTED AT 10 !!!
He's certain because he's certain that EVERY team desperately wanted the next great CBAs for the Saints wanting DRC, how do you KNOW that for certain?
Dude, Chill out already.. Man. Like you are friggin perfect and have NEVER made a mistake.
As for the Saints wanting DRC, how do you KNOW that for certain?
Wow..KC called us for the 5th pick? Interesting, was BB high on Dorsey?
From the clip they had yesterday on Patriots.com it showed Belichick saying "if New Orleans doesn't trade up with us, they'll trade up with Baltimore". That suggested that if we stayed at #7 we wouldn't take Ellis because otherwise New Orleans probably would have stayed at #10. That's how I read it anyway.
I hope this show ends up on youtube
10 to 40 is a huge drop. I love future #1s - I love them with all my heart - but I think I'd have had to get their #2 this year and their #1 and #2 next year to do that.
Now - if a team offered it who I reasonably expected to be a top ten pick next year then I think I'd do it.