- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 68,317
- Reaction score
- 105,247
I watched the debate; it sucked!
Still, seems like that was a better choice than watching MNF.
I thought the debate was decent and I can't stand either candidate.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I watched the debate; it sucked!
Still, seems like that was a better choice than watching MNF.
I watched the debate; it sucked!
Still, seems like that was a better choice than watching MNF.
Ratings should be down significantly for the MNF game due to the debate. They were predicting 100 million viewers.
I don't know. I think i'd rather watch football than a racist bigot businessman and a crooked politician debate for 2 hours.
No because then we reward the debate commission for leaving out the guy 62℅ of Americans wanted in the debate. **** those guys and **** Anheuser Busch for sponsoring them. And now I'll step down from my soap box and say **** the nfl too .When you watch the debate, Roger loses.
And THAT is a winner!
The Week 3 Falcons/Saints Monday Night Football game earned a 5.7 overnight rating, down 36% from Chiefs/Packers last year (8.9), down 38% from Bears/Jets in 2014 (9.2) and the lowest for any NFL telecast through the first three weeks of the season. The 5.7 is likely the lowest in the history of Monday Night Football
and don't blame it on the debate because
The last time MNF faced a presidential debate, Week 7 in 2012, Lions/Bears scored a 7.3 overnight. That game faced both a presidential debate and Game 7 of the MLB National League Championship Series.
NFL Week 3 Overnights: Debate Sends MNF to Likely Record Low — Sports Media Watch
Here's the link.
Feeling pretty smug this morning. Don't care if I am just one household. Pulled another 0:00 of NFL this week (outside part of the Patriots game.) No question I would have watched MNF, or at least tuned in frequently, if I weren't boycotting the NFL. As luck would have it, my boycott has coincided with a massive downturn in television ratings. Or maybe it isn't just luck at play; I think a lot of people have finally soured to this league.
Best part is I won't be coming back, ever. So I'm looking forward to the NFL marketing team starting to turn up the heat as the owners sweat bullets. There's simply no way, in any business in the world, no matter how successful, that frequent losses of customer participation in the 10-20% range aren't incredibly concerning.
If this trend does continue, I wonder what else the league can do to increase interest. They've already tweaked the rules to open up the passing game and increase scoring. They've heavily pushed fantasy football and daily fantasy leagues. Games are on 3 days a week. What's left to make a casual fan want to tune back in? I don't think a longer season or a team in London will help.
If this trend does continue, I wonder what else the league can do to increase interest. They've already tweaked the rules to open up the passing game and increase scoring. They've heavily pushed fantasy football and daily fantasy leagues. Games are on 3 days a week. What's left to make a casual fan want to tune back in? I don't think a longer season or a team in London will help.
The Week 3 Falcons/Saints Monday Night Football game earned a 5.7 overnight rating, down 36% from Chiefs/Packers last year (8.9), down 38% from Bears/Jets in 2014 (9.2) and the lowest for any NFL telecast through the first three weeks of the season. The 5.7 is likely the lowest in the history of Monday Night Football
and don't blame it on the debate because
The last time MNF faced a presidential debate, Week 7 in 2012, Lions/Bears scored a 7.3 overnight. That game faced both a presidential debate and Game 7 of the MLB National League Championship Series.
I thought the debate was decent and I can't stand either candidate.
NFL Week 3 Overnights: Debate Sends MNF to Likely Record Low — Sports Media Watch
Here's the link.
Feeling pretty smug this morning. Don't care if I am just one household. Pulled another 0:00 of NFL this week (outside part of the Patriots game.) No question I would have watched MNF, or at least tuned in frequently, if I weren't boycotting the NFL. As luck would have it, my boycott has coincided with a massive downturn in television ratings. Or maybe it isn't just luck at play; I think a lot of people have finally soured to this league.
Best part is I won't be coming back, ever. So I'm looking forward to the NFL marketing team starting to turn up the heat as the owners sweat bullets. There's simply no way, in any business in the world, no matter how successful, that frequent losses of customer participation in the 10-20% range aren't incredibly concerning.
Pirated internet feeds. I mostly do that because I'm cheap but it would work in your situation too. As long as you don't mind the drop in quality.
I dropped Sunday Ticket and went to internet feeds as well, but I can consistnetly find HD (mostly 720p, but sometimes 1080p) feeds to cast to my TV. Feed quality has gone way, way up since I was a broke 21 year old.
I worked in the high-end audio video business for years. The difference between 720P and 1080P is arguably impossible to tell unless you are sitting about a foot from your television, or if you happen to have a projection screen of about 120 inches. 4K, of course, is possibly the biggest advertising hoax I've ever seen, considering that they are putting 4K on 40" television sets. I'd compare this to digital cameras that boast they can do 10 megapixels, but unless you are actually printing it on a large canvass, your camera/phone display is only 1 megapixel (720) or 2 megapixels (1080). It's funny to hear people talk about how much crisper their picture is having 10 megapixels when their display looks exactly the same either way because it can't even show you the difference. Sadly, the most important aspects of getting a great picture, which are motion handling, contrast, and black levels, have gone away with the death of plasma and the domination of LCD, which even on its most high-end set ever is still not that close to a plasma. Luckily, OLED is amazing and will eventually surpass plasma. Sorry to go off topic here, but my original point was that resolution is incredibly overrated and is cited incorrectly as the defining feature of picture quality.
As a video editor professional, I agree. You will have to try and pry my Panasonic Plasma from me.
I'd take an uncompressed 720/1080p signal on my 42" monitor over a watered down h264 4K file any day of the week.