PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Court denies Brady a re-hearing!!!


Status
Not open for further replies.
Disagree all you want but just because a court case doesn't turn out the way you want it to doesn't mean justice was denied.
 
Expected.
 
What is the over/under on when Roger starts his victory laps?
 
I have less than zero faith that the Supreme Court will rule in his favor.

They'll have to wait until they get the next justice confirmed. This is still a major labor issue.
 
Olson was hired for a reason, but i'm not getting my hopes up anymore.
 
They'll have to wait until they get the next justice confirmed. This is still a major labor issue.

In which the NFL has the upper hand. The players should have never accepted that joke of a CBA. They did and screwed themselves over in the process.
 
Time for the Patriots to catch a team "cheating" in Foxboro. Demand blood. Expose the fraud.
 
Disagree all you want but just because a court case doesn't turn out the way you want it to doesn't mean justice was denied.
That's ******** and you know it.

Court proceedings and outcomes can be and are wrong all the time. People are human. Despite best position, we're fickle, fallible folk who pretend otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Goodell wins, no supreme court cares about football air pressure.

It's over, it's Jimmy G time for 4 games.

It's about labor law at this point. And yes, it's over. Brady will need to win over five justices to the NFL's three in order to win while the NFL can tie at 4-4 to have the ruling upheld. It isn't happening. He should just take his suspension at this point and put an end to the off the field distraction.
 
So what is the time frame for filing with the Supreme Court? And more importantly how and when do we find out about wether the suspension can be stayed?
 
I think Brady is toast, but I posted this in another thread -

From the Court's website:

http://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/reportersguide.pdf

"Case law has established four general criteria that the applicant normally must satisfy in order for the Court to grant a stay. They are:

1. that there is a “reasonable probability” that four Justices will grant certiorari, or agree to review the merits of the case;

2. that there is a “fair prospect” that a majority of the Court will conclude upon review that the decision below on the merits was erroneous;

3. that irreparable harm will result from the denial of the stay;

4. finally, in a close case, the Circuit Justice may find it appropriate to balance the equities, by exploring the relative harms to the applicant and respondent, as well as the interests of the public at large."

"There are several possible scenarios for the disposition of an application:

  • A Justice may simply deny without comment or explanation.

  • If a Justice acts alone to deny an application, a petitioner may renew the application to any other Justice of his or her choice, and theoretically can continue until a majority of the Court has denied the application. In practice, renewed applications usually are referred to the full Court to avoid such a prolonged procedure.

  • A Justice may call for a response from the oppo- sition before reaching a final decision. Such responses are usually due by a date and time certain. The Justice may grant an interim stay pending receipt of a response.

    • A Justice may grant. If an application is granted by an individual Justice, or if the full Court acts upon one, its disposition is indicated by a written or- der or sometimes, an opinion.

    An order granting an application will indicate how long the order will remain in effect—usually until the Court acts on the petition for writ of cer- tiorari. In fairly standard language, the order will often go on to state that if the petition is denied, the stay will automatically terminate, but if the Court grants full review, the stay will re- main in effect until the Court hands down a decision on the merits and the mandate or judgment is issued.
• If a Circuit Justice, acting alone, grants an application, the other side may file a motion
the full Court to vacate that Justice’s stay. As a practical matter, these are rarely, if ever,
granted. "
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.


Friday Patriots Notebook 4/19: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Back
Top