- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 37,535
- Reaction score
- 16,314
e.g. Dixon or Booker at 96 instead of Valentine
Agreed.
The decision was made at 96.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.e.g. Dixon or Booker at 96 instead of Valentine
No they're not. Hell, Daniel Thomas was on the Patriots practice squad once, and the Patriots didn't want Helu last year. These guys are no better than Bolden, and none of them are special teamers.
The running back crop in this past draft was pretty horrible too after Elliot and arguably Henry.
Bill didn't draft someone, so therefore that someone must be bad.
Got it.
Since we strangely didn't draft a RB in this draft, I wouldn't mind trading for one.
I love Vikings' Jerick McKinnon. He will never be used by being behind AP, but the guy is a beast. 3rd season, we can get him for cheap, play him with the comitee this year, extend him next year and watch him explode, making Lewis and McKinnon the best backfield in the NFL, behind the GOAT QB. Man... Wait, why do I have an erection right now?
Bill didn't draft someone, so therefore that someone must be bad.
Got it.
No, thank you, on any of them. The draft was the time to get a RB. That time has come and passed. Let's hope the decision to not draft one doesn't come back to bite the team this season.
the current interest level around the league should be an indicator as to what their ability level is right nowMoreno or Foster or hell why not both?
Have to give up serious draft capital for that.In going to hold out hope for Jamal Charles.
the current interest level around the league should be an indicator as to what their ability level is right now
can we stop the "none are better than Bolden" stuff...Bolden sucks as a RB....someone had to say it.
but none are really better than Bolden, and at the very least they arent likely to beat out BB because of his St contributions. These guys wouldn't be cut if they were very goodcan we stop the "none are better than Bolden" stuff...Bolden sucks as a RB....someone had to say it.