PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Sen. Shaheen wants PSI results released


Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know how the anti-trust exemption works, but I had the same thought when I read that Shaheen had spoken up on the issue. I'd love to see Goodell and the NFL get taken down a notch for their arrogance.
The anti-trust exemption is what allows the league to bargain their product on behalf of all teams, then split the revenue evenly among the 32. As I understand it, the biggest impact of removing the antitrust exemption would be that every team would bargain their own deals with each network. Needless to say, if that ever came about, certain teams would be worth more than others, which is what the league wants to avoid (combined with the anarchy of every team doing their own deal with each network).
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately ,no. However I hired a couple of "friends" just up from Guatemala to step in for me. They've promised to get up real close and personal with ol' Rog. Best 500 bucks I ever spent.
 
Those results should have been released from the get go. That said, I would think standing senators have much bigger fish to fry than the PSI results.

The reason for a hearing would largely stem from the fact the NFL has anti-trust exemption and have to be completely legit to maintain it.
 
The anti-trust exemption is what allows the league to bargain their product on behalf of all teams, then split the revenue evenly among the 32. As I understand it, the biggest impact of removing the antitrust exemption would be that every team would bargain their own deals with each network. Needless to say, if that ever came about, certain teams would be worth more than others, which is what the league wants to avoid (combined with the anarchy of every team doing their own deal with each network).

Teams deals with national networks would be small fry, they would all run there own channel online with streaming. NFL ticket would become obsolete.. and teams would decide themselves whether to put in place blackouts should tickets sales begin to fall.
 
Unfortunately ,no. However I hired a couple of "friends" just up from Guatemala to step in for me. They've promised to get up real close and personal with ol' Rog. Best 500 bucks I ever spent.
Joker is the only poster where you can't tell if this is a joke or not. God, I hope it's true.
 
Brady has some of the worse lawyers ever. Kessler with all his huff and puff was caught with this pants down the latest court battle. NFL hired bigger guns and he failed Tom miserably.
Tom should hire Sally and let her right to the courts.
Oh, Don Yee should be fired, but knowing Brady, he stays loyal to a fault.
 
I don't know how the anti-trust exemption works, but I had the same thought when I read that Shaheen had spoken up on the issue. I'd love to see Goodell and the NFL get taken down a notch for their arrogance.

There are two anti-trust exemptions. One is with respect to negotiating TV rights. The other is with respect to being able to have a draft and a salary cap.

Both exemptions are created by federal law. The first one was created by the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961 (and applies to all the pro leagues). The second is by labor law and applies to any business who has negotiated a CBA with the appropriate union representing its employees (the idea is that labor law lets an employer and a union agree to things that would be anti-trust violations in the absence of a CBA on (presumably) the theory that if the workers are OK with such would-be violations (which they be definition are, because they negotiated and agreed to be OK with it), the government should let it go.)
 
Brady has some of the worse lawyers ever. Kessler with all his huff and puff was caught with this pants down the latest court battle. NFL hired bigger guns and he failed Tom miserably.
Tom should hire Sally and let her right to the courts.
Oh, Don Yee should be fired, but knowing Brady, he stays loyal to a fault.
I don't think Brady has bad representation. I don't think Brady's team were prepared to deal with Clement appearing to lie in court. The NFL sure, but a supposedly respected lawyer like Clement. No, I think that caught them off guard.

Really, it's a massive deal, one which isn't being given anywhere near enough attention.
 
Both Warren and Markey are pro-labor. Neither can be happy with this ruling, if they've bothered to look at it. Unfortunately, their team (and Shaheen's) doesn't set the agenda in the US Senate.

This isn't about Brady, so much as it is about the power ratio of management-to-labor.

That is one seriously naive statement -- I mean legendary naive.

Let me ask you about your "team", did they just realize this deflategate thingie seems a bit wrong now? Because at last check the sham has been going on in the press, at times the biggest story in the media, for more than a year. Oh wait, was that the election cycle back then??
ESPN and largely the NFL is a member of that same team, fyi. Disney is a member of that team, fyi. Do you even suppose that maybe just maybe the root of your team's party backers effect how they would sit in silence for so long when a few words from a few well known politicians might have given Goodell pause on this sham?? But last year would have happened outside of an election cycle wouldn't it?
And if their speaking up for the "working man"(oh lord), wouldn't it have been helpful if done before the thing was done, in the books, and now part of guiding judicial case law??????
Wow...

Fyi, the other "team" isn't run any different regarding who pays the bills and how the politics are calculated, and none across the two team's boards spoke up because the political upside was too murky (what was right was irrelevant) ......when going against/mixing it up within the emotions of sports fans beloved NFL as well as taking on media controlling powerhouse titans (especially ones that you are going after are actually part of your own team's $$$ power).

It's the offseason so I'll take some liberty to end it with this: there is one politician who spoke up for Brady loudly from day 1, Donald Trump. That statement isn't an endorsement of Donald trump being president or a disqualifier from him being president (though I get a kick out of it possibly making the collective heads explode of both team member's heads). That is just fact though the team members do not like to hear or contemplate that. And the reason why seems plain: every member of the two teams calculated the politics and what kind of party ripples it would cause. Trump OTOH appears to just about completely lack that filter(maybe that is good, hysterical or both). Again that isn't an endoresement or panning of him, that's just what seems to clearly be the case.
With that said, if the monotonous and painful to watch clown car full of politicians from both teams want to finally do what they should have done before and bring some pressure down on Goodell? I'll gladly take their vapid transparent self serving actions since it just so happens to be right too (something that likely wasn't a factor to these calculating glib automaton boobs).
Point clear?
 
Not sure you need a Senate Hearing, all you need is to mention that the Senate is considering "removing the NFL's Tax Exempt Status".. and Roger will ask how high do you want us to jump.
 
Not sure you need a Senate Hearing, all you need is to mention that the Senate is considering "removing the NFL's Tax Exempt Status".. and Roger will ask how high do you want us to jump.
Nah, he'll say because article 46 they don't have a right to do that and then he'll hand down their punishment.
 
Nah, he'll say because article 46 they don't have a right to do that and then he'll hand down their punishment.

And the courts will agree...
 
Must be an election year...
Yeah probably, I don't care what their reason for it is, as long as more do it. You'd have to be a dummie not to take advantage of the situation.
 
Not sure you need a Senate Hearing, all you need is to mention that the Senate is considering "removing the NFL's Tax Exempt Status".. and Roger will ask how high do you want us to jump.
You know, I was just having a similar thought along these lines: the arrogant power of the NFL and Goodell is accentuated by the fact that an accusatory inquiry from a United States senator is seemingly being met with a contemptuous yawn and smirk. What a belittling crew of assholes. I can't wait for the day they get their comeuppance, although I'm beginning to think none of us will ever see it.
 
I hate to rain on everyone's parade but, the NFL gave up its tax exempt status last year.....

NFL league office gives up tax-exempt status

As much as I would like to see the NFL release the PSI numbers, we all know we will never see them for the pure and simple fact that they would exonerate the Patriots and then Goodell et al would have to somehow justify spending all that money on Wells and lawyers.

Shaheed is just another political hack looking to curry favor. Her tweet is meaningless and the NFL is actually laughing at her!
 
Brady has some of the worse lawyers ever. Kessler with all his huff and puff was caught with this pants down the latest court battle. NFL hired bigger guns and he failed Tom miserably.
Tom should hire Sally and let her right to the courts.
Oh, Don Yee should be fired, but knowing Brady, he stays loyal to a fault.


Yee's problem was playing lawyer and giving Brady TERRIBLE advice which ultimately was the catalyst for this entire fiasco.. as his agent he's doing a fine job and Brady would have no reason to fire him, but he should keep his legal opinions to himself from here on out because that blunder holds a lot of blame in all of this
 
Yee's problem was playing lawyer and giving Brady TERRIBLE advice which ultimately was the catalyst for this entire fiasco.. as his agent he's doing a fine job and Brady would have no reason to fire him, but he should keep his legal opinions to himself from here on out because that blunder holds a lot of blame in all of this
What advice was that? I don't think the phone even mattered. They were going to win no matter what.
 
Point clear?

VERY CLEAR...

First, I don't have a "team."

Second, it's THIS ruling that should rise to a higher level and gives the politicians something they SHOULD speak up about, because the implications are way beyond whether Brady was being treated badly or not.

Third...there is no third. Seriously, yikes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft #5 and Thoughts About Dugger Signing
Matthew Slater Set For New Role With Patriots
Back
Top