PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Once again, Sally Jenkins nails it...


Status
Not open for further replies.
What I said was:

Obviously, any single one of us could disappear and it wouldn't matter..... but if, say, half a million of us disappeared, then even if not a single one of those half million were Neilsen families, they would still notice.

Let me know what part of that you don't understand.
Actually, what you said first was
If you watch the games, the league gets your money.

(And please don't go into the silliness of how you're not a Neilsen family so you don't count; even the people who are not Neilsen families are statistically accounted for)
A) the advertisers money is not my money. Your assertion that I am somehow forced to actually watch the commercials that are shown is specious at best.
B) This clearly insinuates that they know whether an individual is watching. Particularly in the context of discussing my watching or not watching. Since I'm not half a million people, you're going to need to prove that they know that I am watching
 
Sally Jenkins was also Lance Armstrong's biographer and vehemently denied any wrong doing by Lance and defended him for years. She doesn't have the best track record when it comes to making judgments or offering opinions on athletes alleged to have circumvented rules.
 
That would be to put you on ignore because all you really are is a much less literate version of Andy Johnson. All you do is troll this forum looking for little slap fights to get into and b.tch about people posting in threads you monopolize. If you ever contributed anything it might be different but the truth it's that you don't know sh.t about football and haven't ever contributed anything other than gripes to this forum.

Adios douchebag.

I was only trying to stoop to your level.........don't be angry

I'm not going to put you ignore......your posts are much too valuable
 
Last edited:
Yes, advertisers are well aware of the fact that people tend to tune out when the commercials come on. Believe me, all of the above has been accounted for.


back to the point.....what money are they taking from me that they wouldn't if I didn't watch the game?
 
If you watch the games, the league gets your money.

(And please don't go into the silliness of how you're not a Neilsen family so you don't count; even the people who are not Neilsen families are statistically accounted for).

I watch all my games on illegal HD streams on the internet. I have no one making any money from me. ;)

Literally every sport you would ever watch is being streamed. Even Kabaddi lol

There are thousands of people doing it online, soon it will become mainstream, its IMO the reason ESPN is losing subscribers like no tomorrow.

current small screen grab of the champions league I am watching, but am watching on a 40" screen

http://s32.postimg.org/9kxgaphmb/imagehd.png
 
Last edited:
I watch all my games on illegal HD streams on the internet. I have no one making any money from me. ;)

Literally every sport you would ever watch is being streamed. Even Kabaddi lol

There are thousands of people doing it online, soon it will become mainstream, its IMO the reason ESPN is losing subscribers like no tomorrow.

current small screen grab of the champions league I am watching, but am watching on a 40" screen

http://s32.postimg.org/9kxgaphmb/imagehd.png



I've tried doing illegal streaming but it sucked bad. Extreme lag and bad quality making it almost unwatchable. Not only that, these illegal stream sites are questionable on computer safety. I wouldn't dare visit one of these sites without ad-block plus with pop-up blocker turned on. Otherwise I would be asking for a virus/malware.
 
She makes some good points and it would be interesting to see how it might have played out if Team Brady took a different tack. Most likely, though, the judges would not have wanted to get bogged down in the science and other factual issues and this strategy would have also failed.
 
Actually, what you said first was

A) the advertisers money is not my money. Your assertion that I am somehow forced to actually watch the commercials that are shown is specious at best.
B) This clearly insinuates that they know whether an individual is watching. Particularly in the context of discussing my watching or not watching. Since I'm not half a million people, you're going to need to prove that they know that I am watching
iWKad22.jpg
 
back to the point.....what money are they taking from me that they wouldn't if I didn't watch the game?
You already asked me that question and I answered it. What part of my response did you not understand?
 
I've tried doing illegal streaming but it sucked bad. Extreme lag and bad quality making it almost unwatchable. Not only that, these illegal stream sites are questionable on computer safety. I wouldn't dare visit one of these sites without ad-block plus with pop-up blocker turned on. Otherwise I would be asking for a virus/malware.
Same here. Illegal steaming is atrocious. Plus it would be frustrating to see a scoring update on my computer about 5 minutes before I finally got to see the actual score on my "live" stream.
 
You already asked me that question and I answered it. What part of my response did you not understand?

Can you elaborate on your answer? I don't get the tangible cost

I'm trying to understand how at 1pm in Sunday it costs me more to watch football than Julia Child on pbs
 
Can you elaborate on your answer? I don't get the tangible cost

I'm trying to understand how at 1pm in Sunday it costs me more to watch football than Julia Child on pbs
I've never watched Julia Child on PBS, nor do I know how that program accounts for its ratings and marketing, which I believe has to do with public funding moreso than advertiser revenue, so I cannot speak to that example. However I will restate my thesis and attempt to be more clear:

(1) The NFL makes billions of dollars from ABC/ESPN, NBC, CBS and Fox

(2) The reason why those networks/stations pay so much money for broadcast rights is because so many people watch the games

(3) When people in here state "the NFL gains nothing from me because I don't buy NFL merchandise or buy tickets, I only watch the games" that is a fallacy. Even if all you do is watch the games, the NFL still makes money - and an awful lot of it - because of you

(4) An individual not being a Neilsen member is irrelevant to point (3). There are other statistical methodologies in play to account for the true number of viewers. Neilsen numbers are certainly important, but not all encompassing.

(5) And, since I apparently have to mention this for certain people in here (not you), no one single individual person registers as even a blip on the league's radar. You could spend your entire life ignoring (and I mean truly ignoring) the NFL or you could spend your entire life giving the NFL all your leisure time and money and they would not notice because you are only one single individual person. But collectively, as a group, all those people who "only watch the games" are still fattening the league's coffers.
 
Disagree completely. That's what everyone thought going in but Clement and the justices went right down the road of presumed guilt and in retrospect that it's the battle they should have fought. The NFL conceded in Bermans court that they had no evidence and that point should have been hammered home, with the focus Brady's innocence and a rigged process.

From Berman's opinion:
An arbitrator's factual findings are generally not open to judicial challenge, and we accept the facts as the arbitrator found them.
Now, what was it you disagree with? You think you know the better litigation strategy than Kessler? Are you a senior partner at a large law firm with a 40 year career representing clients with very large amounts of money to spend on lawyers?
 
No. I'm not. I'm a lifelong Pats fan, now retired , that is super pizzed off that some rich punk scumbag elitist is deliberately shytting all over my choice to enjoy the remaining years I have left, with zero regard for ME, personally. THAT is a HUGE mistake, FYI. I, personally will NEVER REST until this POS is either dead or incarcerated.Litigation? Don't make me laugh. This is a street thing now. I could care less what these courts or lawyers have to say. This ****ing punk Goodell thinks he can pi$$ all over my life and claim I'm standing in the rain, and then walk off laughing about HIS integrity. The idiot should be more worried about the ****ing integrity of his brainpan.
 
I've tried doing illegal streaming but it sucked bad. Extreme lag and bad quality making it almost unwatchable. Not only that, these illegal stream sites are questionable on computer safety. I wouldn't dare visit one of these sites without ad-block plus with pop-up blocker turned on. Otherwise I would be asking for a virus/malware.

You need a VPN to start of with, this protects you. Not cheap but when like me your saving £100 a month by not paying for satellite or cable then the cost is ok. Do not go near Flash video sites that have countless adverts. Using Ace stream and P2P software is the best, the VPN will protect your true ISPN address.

I have been using this method for nearly two years now and never had a virus. What I will say is that the last 6 months has seen a massive improvement IMO in the streams available.

I have been using sites that I have got to trust also.
 
If I knew how to send a link via PM I would, currently watching MLB Tor vs CWS. If the two guys above send me a PM that spoke about this, then I will reply with the link.
 
Sally Jenkins was also Lance Armstrong's biographer and vehemently denied any wrong doing by Lance and defended him for years. She doesn't have the best track record when it comes to making judgments or offering opinions on athletes alleged to have circumvented rules.
More proof Brady is cheating. Sally Jenkins is the smoking gun :eek:.
 
Monday we learn that Brady gets railroaded again. Now Jenkins whom I like for her support of Brady throughout this painful saga plays Monday morning QB with the woulda shoulda.

Why didn't she suggest this before the hearing. She is totally accurate on the wrongdoings of the league, but is late to the party on proposed strategy for the NFLPA.

I mentioned on this site once about details of false info from Wells report that should prove Brady's innocence in the Berman hearing. I was told by the so called Lawyers on this site that info from the investigation cannot be argued. Only the details of the CBA.

So please Sally and the rest of you so called lawyer hacks. You have about as much clue into big time Legal theatre strategy of this case as that goofy Maine attorney who embarrassed us all with his bush league stunt.

Brady is innocent and hopefully in the near future it comes to light. Enough with all these attorneys talking about sh*t they have no clue or real game experience on. Just puffing out their chests hoping someone will recognize them.
 
I've never watched Julia Child on PBS, nor do I know how that program accounts for its ratings and marketing, which I believe has to do with public funding moreso than advertiser revenue, so I cannot speak to that example. However I will restate my thesis and attempt to be more clear:

(1) The NFL makes billions of dollars from ABC/ESPN, NBC, CBS and Fox

(2) The reason why those networks/stations pay so much money for broadcast rights is because so many people watch the games

(3) When people in here state "the NFL gains nothing from me because I don't buy NFL merchandise or buy tickets, I only watch the games" that is a fallacy. Even if all you do is watch the games, the NFL still makes money - and an awful lot of it - because of you

(4) An individual not being a Neilsen member is irrelevant to point (3). There are other statistical methodologies in play to account for the true number of viewers. Neilsen numbers are certainly important, but not all encompassing.

(5) And, since I apparently have to mention this for certain people in here (not you), no one single individual person registers as even a blip on the league's radar. You could spend your entire life ignoring (and I mean truly ignoring) the NFL or you could spend your entire life giving the NFL all your leisure time and money and they would not notice because you are only one single individual person. But collectively, as a group, all those people who "only watch the games" are still fattening the league's coffers.

Allow me to ask again....this should not be difficult.....I am not asking how the league is making money ... I only want to know what the cost difference TO ME of watching football on TV versus not watching football

I don't give a crap about the rest of it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
Back
Top