CHB chiming in right on cue

I won't even bother linking to it, it's on the Globe website if you're interested. .

Amazing how a lot of Boston sports media have jobs where the only task is trying to annoy Patriot fans....

Not sure who that even is, probably a good thing. I'm still waiting for Jackie Mac to apologize, won't read anymore of her stuff ever since she wrote that obnoxious article. And I used to really like her basketball stuff.

Backstabbing Shank Shaugnessey wrote: "The judges think that Brady and the Patriots are guilty."

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts.

Sorry, Shank, but the 2 (of 4) judges who ruled in favor of the league were not ruling on the merits of Brady's guilt or innocence.

The fact that Shank understands so little of what is actually going on really hurts his credibility (even if we generously assume he had any credibility in the first place)

XLIX said:

Backstabbing Shank Shaugnessey wrote: "The judges think that Brady and the Patriots are guilty."

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts.

Sorry, Shank, but the 2 (of 4) judges who ruled in favor of the league were not ruling on the merits of Brady's guilt or innocence.

The fact that Shank understands so little of what is actually going on really hurts his credibility (even if we generously assume he had any credibility in the first place)

Click to expand...

Bitter old hack. He's irrelevant.

I would love to put Shank in a big garbage bag with a bunch of starving rats

saw volin on greta last night

he actually wasn't that bad. i hate his face though!!!

Seriously, how the **** does this guy still have a job in Boston as a journalist?!?!?! It's unreal the depths he goes to to try and take the contrarian/devils advocate/troll position on everything relating to the local teams. I mean really, what an *******. Does he get off on this ****? Is he paid to write like a dipshit???? Or is he just a douche of epic proportions? I'm betting the latter, but formulate your own opinion...mine is right here.

But the bigger issue is Shank's total lack of understanding of what is going on. The court cases were basically about labor law. Yes, a generalization on my part, but that's the nuts and bolts of it. It has NOTHING, ZERO, ZIP, ZILCH to do with innocence/guilt of Brady or the Patriots. Its LABOR f'n LAW. But just in case, the entire ordeal can be explained by the IGL (I'm a physicist so I know a bit about this stuff...). The general level of stupidity involved in this circus has been....disgusting. Its ****ing science people (referring to NFL front office and other haters/deniers)...it CAN'T be argued.

As for the entire situation, **** IT ALL. Corrupt railroad job from the beginning. I can only hope that the 2nd Circuit grants en banc....but at this point its pretty much a hail mary.

He's an a-hole

I don't know who you're talking about but why don't you just stop listening to him. Change the station. if it's a article, don't click on it. What's the point of posting this stuff on here again and again and again. We get it, they like stirring up Pats fans because it's good business for them. So why don't you make it bad business for them by not cliking on their links. And not tuning in when they are on. And even if they do change still don't tune in. Don't take the bait.

Why bother with the local media? Or national? They all suck b@lls.

Not even going to click on the article. I heard a few quotes from it, sounds like filth.

A Shank thread!? Ugh...

XLIX said:

Backstabbing Shank Shaugnessey wrote: "The judges think that Brady and the Patriots are guilty."

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts.

Sorry, Shank, but the 2 (of 4) judges who ruled in favor of the league were not ruling on the merits of Brady's guilt or innocence.

The fact that Shank understands so little of what is actually going on really hurts his credibility (even if we generously assume he had any credibility in the first place)

Click to expand...

Shank isn't entitled to an opinion either. He's not entitled to breath air.

He writes this stuff and giggles after clicking send, he's probably lurking this page...

Seriously. Could we have a mod delete of this? I saw the title of his article and got pissed, but why give him the satisfaction?

Can mods just delete threads?

GeneralSkeletor said:

Seriously, how the **** does this guy still have a job in Boston as a journalist?!?!?!

Click to expand...

Well, let's start with the fact that we're posting about him in a thread about his latest column. He's not a reporter he's there to have provocative/trollish takes to whip people up in a frenzy just so they'll read his next column full of infuriating ********.

The easiest way to stay relevant is to piss people off. He's no different than a heel in wrestling.

"Yes, it's true..I have no ****..."

Joker said:

"Yes, it's true..I have no ****..."

Click to expand...

That photo should be in the encyclopedia illustrating the entry for "recessive genetics."

chb still salty after all these years that he wasn't invited to that Patriots press breakfast

Shank is a pud ........