- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 68,285
- Reaction score
- 105,206
I disagree.They wouldn't cut him. He started 9 games last season was the 7th overall pick and was basically in his 2nd year since he broke his leg and spent his rookie year on IR.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I disagree.They wouldn't cut him. He started 9 games last season was the 7th overall pick and was basically in his 2nd year since he broke his leg and spent his rookie year on IR.
That's why it's called "PREseason"Trey Flowers looked good last year in the preseason.
Yes he was.
It's irrelevant what round Jones was picked in. What is relevant is the number of sacks he brought to the team.
The question I have is this: which do you prefer, 10+ sacks for next season or a 2nd rounder + a guard who was benched for a guard the Patriots cut?
I'd take the 10+ sacks for one season.
WHAT???? The 2nd rounder isn't for this year? Am I understanding this correctly?
All the stats show that Jones wasn't the Patriots best pass rush guy. It was, in fact, Sheard.
Absolutely. Sheard was hands down best pass rusher last year. But what we don't know is if he'll maintain that level when his snaps increase to jones level. We're gonna find outAll the stats show that Jones wasn't the Patriots best pass rush guy. It was, in fact, Sheard.
It's irrelevant what round Jones was picked in. What is relevant is the number of sacks he brought to the team.
The question I have is this: which do you prefer, 10+ sacks for next season or a 2nd rounder + a guard who was benched for a guard the Patriots cut?
I'd take the 10+ sacks for one season.
It's irrelevant what round Jones was picked in. What is relevant is the number of sacks he brought to the team.
The question I have is this: which do you prefer, 10+ sacks for next season or a 2nd rounder + a guard who was benched for a guard the Patriots cut?
I'd take the 10+ sacks for one season.
at the time pats had Mankins in his prime and brian waters so it was hard for a 6th round pick to make the team at G sure now he would be a starter, as for cooper i am hoping a new system and some time with one of the best OL coachs of all time will get him back to being a good playerBut... Ted Larsen replaced Cooper. Larsen is a guy the Patriots cut.
Jones had four strip sacks last year, each one of them turned the game. He made big time play after big time play. He will not be replaced and the defense will be less without him.
Plus you also just traded away Gronk's BFF, if he wasn't already *****ing about being underpaid, he might start now.
They traded Jones for a guy who was benched for Ted Larsen, a guy who could not even make the Pats roster! and a late second round pick.
Bad move
I don't know I think he may have gotten lucky here. I thought he was more worth a 3rd based on what I see him do on the field
Gimme a break. You can support the trade, as I do, without making silly statements like how he had 10+ sacks in "mostly meaningless situations". Including the playoffs, he had 8 1/2 sacks in games that were decided by one score or less.10+ sacks in mostly meaningless situations
Overrated
It's irrelevant what round Jones was picked in. What is relevant is the number of sacks he brought to the team.
The question I have is this: which do you prefer, 10+ sacks for next season or a 2nd rounder + a guard who was benched for a guard the Patriots cut?
I'd take the 10+ sacks for one season.