- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 68,317
- Reaction score
- 105,247
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.And the Chiefs will appeal
Clark Hunt: Tampering penalty inconsistent with past discipline
Take note Robert Kraft you pansy.
Or get him on his side and overthrow this ****-tater of a commisionerI'm all for taking Kraft to task for caving in to the league, but Hunt was one of the the 31 telling him to just accept the penalties and not appeal.
When Hunt's team is the one getting whacked, his reaction is much different. It's a fantasy, but I hope RK reminds Clark Hunt of his stance a year ago and that he should just accept the penalties.
I'm all for taking Kraft to task for caving in to the league, but Hunt was one of the the 31 telling him to just accept the penalties and not appeal.
When Hunt's team is the one getting whacked, his reaction is much different. It's a fantasy, but I hope RK reminds Clark Hunt of his stance a year ago and that he should just accept the penalties.
Can't hurt.RK should fully support Hunt so that he might turn him against Goodell.
Basically what I was saying - "see judge, wildly inconsistent is the precedent!"Any chance the league is trying to make a case that they have no bias against the Pats because they also took away picks from other teams? The Chiefs is a small market franchise and they are being used here imo.