Strawman nothing. He signed a clause as an owner stating he would not sue the league as part of the collective ownership group.
And there are exceptions, Al Davis and the Raiders for one.
Your strawman argument is he should have done something he couldn't. You wanted him to file a lawsuit in direct contradiction to a contract he signed stating he wouldn't. As far as the appeal goes, you're delusional if you think it would have gone past the Goodell decision.
Well there certainly is no point in having a discussion with you if after this many exchanges you still make things up that you claim my argument is.
There is no lawsuit discussion until after an appeal, and even at that point its dubious, but to claim the franchise could be taken away is moronic.
So, you are saying Kraft himself is wrong when he now says he handled it wrong, and should have appealed?
You are basing your entire argument on knowing the outcome before it happens, which is the definition of delusional.
If Brady's case is quickly decided in his favor I'm hoping Kraft can find a legal way to fight back.
What? He shouldn't have appealed and will lose the franchise if he sues, but you want him to take legal action?
Just admit your entire presence in this thread is to defend Kraft against criticism he admits he deserves. You argue he should have done nothing, but almost a year later, you want him to fight?
Btw, by the time there is a Brady decision the draft will be over, and the appeal of the Brady verdict has nothing to do with the picks because it has nothing to do with guilt or innocence.
As Ice has made clear and I'm in the hopefull category theres still 2 months until the draft. The story isn't over yet.
"I am choosing to end the rhetoric. We will grudgingly accept the penalty.
We will not appeal"
He had the chance to appeal. Your argument seems to be that he was a genius to waive his right to appeal when he had one so he could wait a year and oops, just kidding, can I appeal now?????