- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 55,449
- Reaction score
- 26,444
SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Plus, the vast majority of people (in the media and elsewhere) saying he couldn't win are not lawyers. And of the ones who are lawyers, the vast majority are not labour lawyers. And of the labour lawyers, none of them are the judge presiding over the case.
im referring to the idiotic idea that people wanted to do things like keep NFL officals out of the stadium and deny press credentials to ESPN reporters. But kraft has specifically said how Deflategate is BS and completely overblown, he also called out the NFL for leaking the story; fans seemingly want him to hold a Allen iverson-esq press conference and then release a dis track.
there is no legal precedent for suing a league over loss draft picks, what legal basis would you use for something like that?
He didn't want to make life difficult for Jonathan when he takes over. Look at Mark Davis in Oakland. Owners still hold it against him for what his father did. Bob knows this that's why he stood down.
doesnt work like that,it be nice but it doesnt. Goodel violated the CBA by suspending brady; there is no labor law protection for the Patriots as there was for Brady.
The fact that people are trying to compare Krafts role in losing draft picks to Chamberlains role in the most horrific event in the history of the human race is idiotic......and a bit terrifying.That is the stupidest garbage I've ever read.
The fact that you have to fantasize that anyone fails to understand that Goodel and Hitler were the Real Evils that Kraft and Chamberlain cowardly caved into is hilarious...and a bit terrifying.
So your argument is that you once heard someone suggest he should do things that would be stupid so therefore he is justified to do nothing?
Goodell is not his partner. He is an EMPLOYEE of he and his partners. And yes of course he has a right to challenge unfair treatment.
Next time try the HI Express, they make you farking brilliant like tom444.
No it makes no sense in the context of krafts failure to protect his franchise against goodells actions.
Your straw man that to hold Kraft accountable to protecting the franchise against being stolen from means you are blaming him instead of goodell is not representative of what anyone has posted. But you know that.
