SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.James White was the only silver lining on offense down the stretch of the season and everyone around here is anxious to get rid of him? Yep, it must be the offseason.
Yes. He is very reliable in that respect.Can he protect the passer?
30 years old. Definitely has a good year or two left in the tank.
Very consistent, durable, versatile, 3 down running back.
Career averages: 1075 rushing yards, 60 receptions (2015 was a down year with 898 & 44, but missed 3 games)
Great attitude and great guy. Very fit to be a New England Patriot.
Some 2015 Highlights:
Blount did not look good this year. Granted, our run blocking was terrible, but he never really made yards for himself and appeared to miss the hole the few times it appeared.
White is younger, will be cheaper on his rookie contract than LGB, and showed more promise than I think a lot of us anticipated. Do I want White in a starting role? Absolutely not. He's terrible between the tackles, but he showed he can play the Vereen role very competently and Lewis will be back as well next year.
I think literally anyone we sign to for the big back role can and/or would be better than Blount this year. We'll see how FA and the draft shake out, but I don't particularly want to see Blount back at all, let alone swapping him for James White.
What?! Bolden is a ST only....white is marginal.....Blount is toast.....time to rebootPerhaps the Pats can bring both Blount and White back and try to improve on Bolden.
If the money is right, this is an absolute no brainer.
You've essentially described my best case scenario and have kept in line with BB's scorched earth approach to losing to Peyton in January.Imagine a line-up with Gronk, Edelman, Amendola/Lafell/improvement at either TE2 or WR, with Lewis and Forte in the backfield. Yikes. You cannot key on run or pass and those options, if Brady is given time, would be borderline indefensible. Unlike before 2013, I honestly believe that Forte will wind up a Patriot this offseason and Blount will be allowed to walk.
I think the Gore deal with Indy is the most instructive example for a "comp" player....3 yrs/$12m. Maybe with the cap going up a Forte deal would be a bit north of that, maybe the 2nd/3rd year dollar commitments are lessened, I don't know. But that kind of ballpark for total value I think gets it done. He's on record saying it's about winning, he knows he's not a 27 yr old load back, he hasn't taken nearly the beating people assume him to based on touches because he's big but shifty, and he's Brady-level crazy about fitness and nutrition.I'd be interested in y'all saying what you'd pay Forte.
I think the Gore deal with Indy is the most instructive example for a "comp" player....3 yrs/$12m. Maybe with the cap going up a Forte deal would be a bit north of that, maybe the 2nd/3rd year dollar commitments are lessened, I don't know. But that kind of ballpark for total value I think gets it done. He's on record saying it's about winning, he knows he's not a 27 yr old load back, he hasn't taken nearly the beating people assume him to based on touches because he's big but shifty, and he's Brady-level crazy about fitness and nutrition.
I love the guy he does everything really really well. Would I pay him 4/$24m or something like that? No. I just don't think there's any basis to assume that's what he'll demand. As someone said way earlier, I have no doubt they'll call him. I don't think he'll find a better fit for what he's looking for. Even at "market rate" (which as I said I think Gore is the comp, not Lynch or Murray) he's a steal.
Talent trumps youth, Brady will tell you that too
My point is, how many 30+ year old running back additions turn out to be "good" signings?
Just last off-season there was 2... Gore and D'Angelo Williams.
If they can get Forte for a $2m deal I'd hope they do it. $3m might be pushing it though.
My point is, how many 30+ year old running back additions turn out to be "good" signings?
Just last off-season there was 2... Gore and D'Angelo Williams.
I would not consider Gore a good signing last off-season. He averaged a career low 3.7 yards per carry. In the handful of Colts games i saw, he looked close to done. Clearly not a difference maker anymore.
Yep.
When it happened, I called the Gore Signing a Dumb Ass Mistake.
Turned out: I was right.
I would not consider Gore a good signing last off-season. He averaged a career low 3.7 yards per carry. In the handful of Colts games i saw, he looked close to done. Clearly not a difference maker anymore.
Deangelo was a solid signing. He stepped in and played well for Bell. But he has not shouldered the load that Forte has over the years. He played in a committee with Jonathan Stewart for the majority of his career which has helped keep him fresher.
Personally, I'd rather pluck a guy from the draft. You've got all around guys like Ezekiel Elliot. You've got physical between the tackles runners like Tra Carson and Jordan Howard. You've got your shifty explosive little third down backs like Aaron Green and DeAndre Washington who can catch the ball. All with younger fresher legs and bodies.
The pro guy that excites me is RFA Christine Michael. A clear talent that is young and has five good years ahead of him. Can run from the shotgun and from traditional sets.
I just want to invest in someone young. No more Fred Taylor, Sammy Morris, Lamont Jordan, Steven Jackson type of stuff.