- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 6,038
- Reaction score
- 4,157
I rewatched the 2013 AFC Championship game with the Pats at Denver (ok, so I watched the condensed version on NFL game pass).
Some interesting notes, our current receiving core of Gronk/Edelman/Amendola/LaFell/White/Martin is far better than the2013 group of Edelman/Amendola/Dobson/Collie/Vereen/Mulligan, but our offense wasn't nearly as ineffective in that game as I remember. They had some productive drives (in terms of yardage) that didn't result touchdowns (1 ended in a FG, 1 a turnover on downs, 1 with a sack that pushed them out of FG range).
The issue was that they didn't have the ball as many times as they'd like. Despite having a video game-like, record setting offense, the Broncos went on long drive after long drive. Chewing up clock, dinking and dunking all the way down the field. It wasn't the long ball that kept the offense alive, no, it was consistently just getting enough yards to get first downs.
Sure the Manning of this year is FAR FAR inferior to 2013's version, but he can still dink and dunk, right? I think it will be like playing the Chiefs again. Despite giving up many third downs last week, we still ultimatley made the plays keep them out of the end zone. Hopefully the same is true this week. After, if you look at last week's game you could easily see the game going differently if the Chiefs convert some of their goal line chances and we miss on one of ours. The adage is true that there will be a couple plays that end up deciding the game.
I don't mean to send anyone into a panic, I think we'll still win. I'm just not sure it will be as easy as everyone thinks.
I know comparing teams is very dangerous......after all......the 2012 Pats were better than the 2011 Pats, but the 2011 Pats beat the Ravens in the AFCCG but the 2012 ones did not.
Hopefully we won't see any long balls in Slater's direction.
Some interesting notes, our current receiving core of Gronk/Edelman/Amendola/LaFell/White/Martin is far better than the2013 group of Edelman/Amendola/Dobson/Collie/Vereen/Mulligan, but our offense wasn't nearly as ineffective in that game as I remember. They had some productive drives (in terms of yardage) that didn't result touchdowns (1 ended in a FG, 1 a turnover on downs, 1 with a sack that pushed them out of FG range).
The issue was that they didn't have the ball as many times as they'd like. Despite having a video game-like, record setting offense, the Broncos went on long drive after long drive. Chewing up clock, dinking and dunking all the way down the field. It wasn't the long ball that kept the offense alive, no, it was consistently just getting enough yards to get first downs.
Sure the Manning of this year is FAR FAR inferior to 2013's version, but he can still dink and dunk, right? I think it will be like playing the Chiefs again. Despite giving up many third downs last week, we still ultimatley made the plays keep them out of the end zone. Hopefully the same is true this week. After, if you look at last week's game you could easily see the game going differently if the Chiefs convert some of their goal line chances and we miss on one of ours. The adage is true that there will be a couple plays that end up deciding the game.
I don't mean to send anyone into a panic, I think we'll still win. I'm just not sure it will be as easy as everyone thinks.
I know comparing teams is very dangerous......after all......the 2012 Pats were better than the 2011 Pats, but the 2011 Pats beat the Ravens in the AFCCG but the 2012 ones did not.
Hopefully we won't see any long balls in Slater's direction.
Last edited: