- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 26,101
- Reaction score
- 52,115
I've posted several comparison threads over the years, but the last two months culminating today has caused me to up my ante from "though similar, both are great in different ways" to this: Edelman is significantly better than Welker in his prime.
It's not close. Welker may very well hold onto every Patriots receiving record, but Edelman is flat out better. Edelman might be the hardest receiver to cover in the NFL not named Antonio Brown. Edelman is tougher, stronger, doesn't wear down by the fourth quarter, makes more challenging catches, has a much better catch radius and runs at least as precise routes. He makes the whole offense better in ways Welker could not.
It's not close. Welker may very well hold onto every Patriots receiving record, but Edelman is flat out better. Edelman might be the hardest receiver to cover in the NFL not named Antonio Brown. Edelman is tougher, stronger, doesn't wear down by the fourth quarter, makes more challenging catches, has a much better catch radius and runs at least as precise routes. He makes the whole offense better in ways Welker could not.