SLGDEV
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2015
- Messages
- 178
- Reaction score
- 125
I just don't see Pats losing to Miami, they are truly pathetic.
nor losing to Philadelphia. Remember, "Any given Sunday"
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I just don't see Pats losing to Miami, they are truly pathetic.
A few things -
The Steelers are in no matter what as long as they win one more game. They can't win their division.
The Broncos could still be out entirely if the Bengals beat them next week.
The Pats losing to the Jets and beating the Dolphins instead would make it more likely the Broncos would be out.
The Steelers would get the creampuff wildcard game of all-time at Houston should the Bengals beat Denver.
I just don't see Pats losing to Miami, they are truly pathetic.
I don't think you are correct. There has to be a minimum of four games. What are those four games? There was Denver and whoever Cincy played from the AFC South. AIUI, the tiebreaker goes to to strength of victory which is pts scored minus points given up. Right now we lead that by 166 to 145. (Same record and same conference record).
Forfeiting to the Jets, and beating Miami the following week, is not a good way to prepare your team for the playoffs....better compete with the stronger opponent, and let our backups play against the weaker team
EDIT: not to mention, the Jets are competing for a Wild Card spot, and you can bet they'll throw everything they have against us....I can't think of a better way to test your team than to play against a desperate opponent
I don't think you are correct. There has to be a minimum of four games. What are those four games? There was Denver and whoever Cincy played from the AFC South. AIUI, the tiebreaker goes to to strength of victory which is pts scored minus points given up. Right now we lead that by 166 to 145. (Same record and same conference record).
Even if we wind up with the 2nd seed, I can easily envision the Denver or Cinci losing at home to either KC or Pittsburgh.
So if we only lose 1 game or 0 games, we have #1 seed.
If we lose both games, and Cincy loses to Denver (and both them win their other game), we have #2 seed
If we lose both games and Cincy beats Denver (and both them win their other game),, we have #2 seed
I would almost be more inclined to rest injured players -- gronk, amendola, hightower, chung next week instead of letting them play with lingering injuries -- best case is we luck out and win,
worst case is week 17 becomes a must win -- and we have our full lineup with Edelman back, we should win that one easy and that helps keep the team a bit fresh for the playoffs (by going two weeks instead of 3 without a real game)
In both conferences, the #5 seed should be heavy favorites against the #4 seed. I don't know if that's ever happened in both conferences.
In both conferences, the #5 seed should be heavy favorites against the #4 seed. I don't know if that's ever happened in both conferences.
Another way to boil it down...
NE does not get the #1 seed is if any of following happens:
- NE finishes with same record as DEN (and only DEN)
- CIN finishes with better record than NE
- DEN beats CIN and then there's a NE-CIN-DEN 3-way tie
So that means a guaranteed bye? Yes!
I would rather lose them both and get healthy. The Patriots don't need home field for the AFCCG nearly as much as they need Amendola, Hightower, Edelman, Gronk etc etc.......
If they can get those available healthy for the tournament they win it.