PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

PP's Rich Hill claims Bills used Brady's protection calls against him


Status
Not open for further replies.

PP2

Hall of Fame Poster
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
24,065
Reaction score
24,527


I have been unable to find independent or further corroboration of this. Anyone care to weigh in on this?
 
Maybe it's too early, but I don't know what Hill is saying Buffalo did here.
 
Maybe it's too early, but I don't know what Hill is saying Buffalo did here.

Yes, this might be a very interesting development but it does require some explanation.
 
It sounds like he's implying the Bills deciphered what Brady's protection calls are, and would adjust who blitzed based on who he called out? It's possible, especially since it wouldn't surprise me if the calls had to be simplified due to all the flux on the O-Line.
 
Is he saying that when Brady calls out the protection and blitzes the Bills simply blitzed different guys? I wish playing D was that simple.
 
  • Ha Ha
Reactions: ALP
Brady had success when the Bills sent more pass rushers. He was 5 of 6 for 97 yards with just one throwaway when the Bills rushed more than four players. He was just 3 of 10 for 18 yards with four throwaways when they dropped eight players into coverage. Without pass-catchers like Julian Edelman and Dion Lewis, who can get open in tight coverage, this could be the blueprint for stopping the Patriots — not through their leaky offensive line but by exploiting their depleted offensive weapons.

Doug Kyed (@DougKyed) | Twitter
 


I have been unable to find independent or further corroboration of this. Anyone care to weigh in on this?


This came up briefly somewhere else here, maybe in the post game thread. The Bills were right much too often and were getting free shots at Brady all game long.
 
It sounds like he's implying the Bills deciphered what Brady's protection calls are, and would adjust who blitzed based on who he called out? It's possible, especially since it wouldn't surprise me if the calls had to be simplified due to all the flux on the O-Line.

Sounds like cheating to me, and I 'm sure it will to Roger, once Ted Wells files his report.

Because integrity!
 
If the Bills somehow managed to decipher the Patriots protection calls and still conceded 20 points with a missed FG and an idiotic turnover, then shame on them.
Hah -- true. No wonder Rex was so apoplectic. I also read where one of their DBs said (paraphrase) "we knew all their routes," blah blah blah. I agree that it's all part of normal football; just irksome to think what a national, innuendo-laden crap storm it would be if it was the Patriots.
 
This came up briefly somewhere else here, maybe in the post game thread. The Bills were right much too often and were getting free shots at Brady all game long.
Before the half I mentioned that the Bills likely had the Pat's protection calls translated before the game. It sounded to me like the Pats started changing up the protection call labels before the end of the first half. Even after the Pats adjusted their calls, Pat's OLinement were frequently losing 1 on 1 battles.
 
Sounds like the Bills did their homework on the Pats' line calls. That explains why the protection seemed so awful. Time to step up the level of disguise on those calls I guess.
 
Before the half I mentioned that the Bills likely had the Pat's protection calls translated before the game. It sounded to me like the Pats started changing up the protection call labels before the end of the first half. Even after the Pats adjusted their calls, Pat's OLinement were frequently losing 1 on 1 battles.

Wonder if that's where the Rex Ryan tag came from, from having to rename their plays on the fly.
 
Sounds like the Bills did their homework on the Pats' line calls. That explains why the protection seemed so awful. Time to step up the level of disguise on those calls I guess.
Unless the Pats didn't change their protection calls between games, deciphering calls before the start of a game isn't homework, it's espionage.
 
Sounds like the Bills did their homework on the Pats' line calls. That explains why the protection seemed so awful. Time to step up the level of disguise on those calls I guess.

Seeing that Ryan has squared off vs BB 15 times or whatever the fact that it took him this long to decipher the protection schemes makes him look like a bigger idiot than I thought he was.

This is the kind of thing Ernie would have had nailed over a cup of coffee.
 
Last edited:
Seeing that Ryan has squared off vs BB 15 times or whatever the fact that it took him this long to decipher the protection schemes makes him look like a bigger idiot than I thought he was.

This is the kind of think Ernie would have had nailed over a cup of coffee.
By decipher, he likely means the specific words used to call the protections that game. I'm fairly certain these are changed between every game.
 
Wonder if that's where the Rex Ryan tag came from, from having to rename their plays on the fly.

I thought the Rex Ryan call was pretty early in the game?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/16: News and Notes
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/15: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-14, Mock Draft 3.0, Gilmore, Law Rally For Bill 
Potential Patriot: Boston Globe’s Price Talks to Georgia WR McConkey
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/12: News and Notes
Not a First Round Pick? Hoge Doubles Down on Maye
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/11: News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft #5 and Thoughts About Dugger Signing
Matthew Slater Set For New Role With Patriots
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/10: News and Notes
Back
Top