PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Tom Brady's interview with GQ


Status
Not open for further replies.
Impressive how they can simultaneously name him Man of the Year and do a hatchet job on him.

Hey Klosterman -- didja ever think that maybe the reason why pre-interview your interview got chopped from a "wide-ranging" sitdown interview to a 45-min phone call is that Brady's camp found out from back channels what you were up to?
 
Wow, Klosterman comes off like a whiny brat who did no homework whatsoever. You could see the point where Brady decided he was going to refuse to answer the question yet again just on principle.
 
I can't believe he was going to ask Brady about that fumbling "study" that's been debunked by anyone with half a brain.

Actually, there was an even simpler botch -- the question Brady refused to answer was phrased in such a way as to ASSUME there was something nefarious going on. The old cliche "Have you stopped beating your wife?" actually applies in this case.
 
Not worth the read in my opinion. The guy isn't trying to tar Brady and he's not trying to vindicate him either. It's GQ. They do clothes and you can tell by all the pretty boy pictures of Brady. Here's the relevant portion

There’s one element of the Wells Report that I find fascinating: The report concludes that you had a “general awareness” of the footballs being deflated. The report doesn’t say you wereaware. It says you were generally aware. So I’m curious—would you say that categorization is accurate? I guess it depends on how you define the wordgenerally. But was that categorization true or false?
[pause] I don’t really wanna talk about stuff like this. There are several reasons why. One is that it’s still ongoing. So I really don’t have much to say, because it’s—there’s still an appeal going on.

Oh, I realize that. But here’s the thing: If we don’t talk about this, the fact that you refused to talk about it will end up as the center of the story. I mean, how can you not respond to this question? It’s a pretty straightforward question.
I’ve had those questions for eight months and I’ve answered them, you know, multiple times for many different people, so—

I don’t think you have, really. When I ask, “Were you generally aware that this was happening,” what is the answer?
I’m not talking about that, because there’s still ongoing litigation. It has nothing to do with the personal question that you’re trying to ask, or the answer you’re trying to get. I’m not talking about anything as it relates to what’s happened over the last eight months. I’ve dealt with those questions for eight months. It’s something that—obviously I wish that we were talking about something different. But like I said, it’s still going on right now. And there’s nothing more that I really want to add to the subject. It’s been debated and talked about, especially in Boston, for a long time.
Do you feel what has happened over these eight months has changed the way the Patriots are perceived?
I don’t really care how the Patriots are perceived, truthfully. I really don’t. I really don’t. Look, if you’re a fan of our team, you root for us, you believe in our team, and you believe in what we’re trying to accomplish. If you’re not a fan of us, you have a different opinion.

But what you’re suggesting is that the reality of this is subjective. It’s not. Either you were “generally aware” of this or you weren’t.
I understand what you’re trying to get at. I think that my point is: I’m not adding any more to this debate. I’ve already said a lot about this—

Tom, you haven’t. I wouldn’t be asking these questions if you had. There’s still a lack of clarity on this.
Chuck, go read the transcript from a five-hour appeal hearing. It’s still ongoing.

I realize it’s still ongoing. But what is your concern? That by answering this question it will somehow—
I’ve already answered all those questions. I don’t want to keep revisiting what’s happened over the last eight months. Whether it’s you, whether it’s my parents, whether it’s anybody else. If that’s what you want to talk about, then it’s going to be a very short interview.
So you’re just not going to comment on any of this? About the idea of the balls being underinflated or any of the other accusations made against the Patriots regarding those first three Super Bowl victories? You have no comments on any of that?
Right now, in my current state in mid-October, dealing with the 2015 football season—I don’t have any interest in talking about those events as they relate to any type of distraction that they may bring to my team in 2015. I do not want to be a distraction to my football team. We’re in the middle of our season. I’m trying to do this as an interview that was asked of me, so… If you want to revisit everything and be another big distraction for our team, that’s not what I’m intending to do.

But if I ask you whether or not you were generally aware of something and you refuse to respond, any rational person is going to think you’re hiding something.
Chuck, I’ve answered those questions for many months. There is no—

Were you not informed by any of the people around you that these questions were going to be asked?
[sort of incredulously] No. I was—

No?
This is ongoing litigation.

Okay, well I appreciate you taking—
I appreciate it.

—the time to talk to me. Sorry, man.
Okay.
 
I read the whole thing.

To me, the most important words spoken by Brady were words we should all take to heart: "I don’t really care how the Patriots are perceived, truthfully. I really don’t. I really don’t. Look, if you’re a fan of our team, you root for us, you believe in our team, and you believe in what we’re trying to accomplish. If you’re not a fan of us, you have a different opinion."

Hoping that people outside New England and Patriot Nation will "come around" to our point of view is ridiculous.

But, as Klosterman observes in his comparisons to other teams and athletes, eventually they will come around. It just might take 20 years or so.

Otherwsie, it's clear that GQ/Klosterman had an agenda. Whether it was Klosterman's or his editors', we can't know.

Klosterman could have asked the questions he claims he wanted to ask without Brady repeating what he said in the five hour Appeal interview. But he didn't.

Klosterman and his editors knew that Brady wouldn't answer any questions related to "Deflategate" while the case is still in litigation. Those questions were all part of an agenda.

Brady wouldn't have answered them, even if he asked them. As Brady observes, the case is still in litigation and there is no way in hell that he could answer any of those questions. There is no way in hell he could do anything but refer to the record before the Court.

So, was Klosterman dumb not to ask them?

Or was he intimidated by Brady?

Or was he embarrassed to ask them because he knew they were dumb and he used Brady's refusal as air cover for not asking them?

The section that begins with "I did not think he would contradict any statement he gave under oath. But I still needed to establish that (seemingly predictable) denial as a baseline, in order to ask the questions I was much more interested in. Specifically…"

...the entire next section after that reads like something his editors inserted.

I also like the pic. They found an angle that makes it look like Brady's thumbing his nose at the world. He is "Man of the Year," after all.
 
Clear to me that GQ's agenda was to "break" the big admission by Brady...Oh that would have been such a feather in the cap! Would have sold a real lot of GQs, too. No doubt.
 
Impressive how they can simultaneously name him Man of the Year and do a hatchet job on him.

Hey Klosterman -- didja ever think that maybe the reason why pre-interview your interview got chopped from a "wide-ranging" sitdown interview to a 45-min phone call is that Brady's camp found out from back channels what you were up to?

I would edit your comment to read "...and [try to] do a hatchet job on him." I don't think they succeeded.

Obviously, the questions were questions they knew Brady couldn't answer without Kessler murdering him.

In the end, he's "Man of the Year" because he thumbs his nose at the world (love that picture!) and he wins and he keeps winning. He doesn't care what people think of him or the Patriots.

As the piece suggests, in 20 years nobody will remember him as anything but the GOAT. The rest will be seen for what it is: the resentment and jealousy of lesser people. Even now, he's still the GQ "Man of the Year."
 
Clear to me that GQ's agenda was to "break" the big admission by Brady...Oh that would have been such a feather in the cap! Would have sold a real lot of GQs, too. No doubt.
Nah. They weren't that dumb. They knew he wouldn't discuss anything in litigation. This isn't a middle school reporter.

The questions were all to set up the contrast between the guy who keeps winning and why people hate him. He's "Man of the Year" because he "wins" and because people "hate him."

They hate him today but the article acknowledges that in 20 years, people will only remember him as the GOAT (in a sheepskin jacket, BTW).
 
cblog_bacc9d450b-thumbc.jpg


another literary tough guy....love the "geek grows beard to look mean" fail
 
That's an unfortunate interview. I've heard Klosterman on Simmons podcasts and he usually comes off as very thoughtful and not a person who goes with the crowd consensus or narratives. Those questions were terrible and make him sound unprepared and unprofessional.

I would have much rather heard the answers to the first 40 minutes worth of questioning which he glosses over in the interview. I would have thought Klosterman could ask some good questions that would make Brady stop and think, not things that he's heard 100 times before and not about freaking Deflategate which was declared dead six weeks before the interview.
 
Man of the Year doesn't necessarily mean it's a compliment, folks. Don't be cowed.

1980_ayatullah_khomeini.jpg



main-qimg-ff1e1864dba6a20da3148bff370c4dea


hitler-time.jpg
 
What the **** kind of article was that? I mean are they serious about printing this and putting it in their magazine? There are so many questions he could have asked Tom so much insight he could have gotten but the majority of the article is the writer repeating the same question after Tom has told him more than once he is not answering. Then going on a tangent about how he believes Tom (but not really)and still claiming the Patriots are cheaters. I have never seen such an absurd print interview in my life. Like I am just flabbergasted at what I read.
 
Maybe it's not a compliment for TIME magazine but this was GQ and they'r....why they're gentlemanly!
 
If he asked about ted wells report, he shouldve also read the appeal transcripts and the whole berman hearing. Instead he just asked what wells report was true like brady is sitting another appeal hearing. Iam sure brady gave his PR guys a tongue lashing after the interview.
 
Somehow I don't think GQ ever named Hitler Man of the Year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/25: News and Notes
Patriots Kraft ‘Involved’ In Decision Making?  Zolak Says That’s Not the Case
MORSE: Final First Round Patriots Mock Draft
Slow Starts: Stark Contrast as Patriots Ponder Which Top QB To Draft
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/24: News and Notes
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Bruschi’s Proudest Moment: Former LB Speaks to MusketFire’s Marshall in Recent Interview
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/22: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-21, Kraft-Belichick, A.J. Brown Trade?
Back
Top