- Joined
- Mar 3, 2005
- Messages
- 8,833
- Reaction score
- 33,791
Patriots to promote Chris Barker to 53-man roster
Hope your game is improved from the preseason. Next man up!
Hope your game is improved from the preseason. Next man up!
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.God, who knows. I'm just thankful there's a living, breathing human being capable of playing tackle in case Fleming or Stork were hurt.Who is going to play tackle? Fleming and Stork or Barker and Fleming?
Who is going to play tackle? Fleming and Stork or Barker and Fleming?
Yeah, and whoever is on him only really needs to worry about getting grabbed by one hand.Love Stork.......but, not sure about seeing him protecting TB from tackle position and then there is Fleming, a great back up that I wish could remain that way, as a back up.
Pats need the OL to get healthy, starting next week.
They should squeak by this week as Giants really only have one DL'man to worry about.
Who is going to play tackle? Fleming and Stork or Barker and Fleming?
Yeah, and whoever is on him only really needs to worry about getting grabbed by one hand.
I have been expecting Mike Williams to slide into playing tackle, since he is built like one and has played it at the NFL level just a few months ago in Detroit. Seems they will not be doing that, perhaps because a) it would have a negative ripple on the TE game plan, b) he is probably pretty rusty...
Thoughts?
I don't see why it couldn't happen. It's also important to consider the personnel of the other team. If they have faster guys at the ends then logically you'd want your tackles to have better footwork and would certainly consider having Williams in at tackle. That said, if your third string TE is playing tackle you have some real issues.I have been expecting Mike Williams to slide into playing tackle, since he is built like one and has played it at the NFL level just a few months ago in Detroit. Seems they will not be doing that, perhaps because a) it would have a negative ripple on the TE game plan, b) he is probably pretty rusty...
Thoughts?
Top 3 tackles all out. Top 3 tackles all out. TOP 3 TACKLES ALL OUT!!!
Okay, sorry, calming down....but can we agree that NO team would be in good shape in that situation? It's not a "lack of depth planning" issue as some have complained. If anything, paying good money to Cannon as a 3rd tackle should have put the Patriots in better position than most.
Chris Barker is not a tackle. He's under 6'3", has shortish arms, and even in the Mountain West Conference played exclusively at guard. Bryan Stork also is obviously not a tackle and isn't terribly athletic, but he's a stronger overall lineman and showed better than we had any right to expect last week. I'd go with him.
Or being clubbed by a cast.
I thought Claudell might be the better choice, but I'll go with BB's and Gooch's judgment here.
Barker CAN play OT right?