Joey007
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2010
- Messages
- 15,945
- Reaction score
- 20,993
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I would like see the teams' offensive production with their first choice "3d down back" and without - that means production in games in which Kevin Faulk, then Danny Woodhead, then Shane Vereen were out injured and their backup played...I could be wrong, but I bet the difference is staggering....
Agree 100%, a healthy Gronk is virtually unstoppable, and even if you stop him, leaves others open. I think they win the second SB against the Giants with Gronk even at 70%.I feel like injuries are always our biggest obstacle in winning the SB.
I still think we beat the Giants with healthy Gronk
How did "next man up" work in 2013? How did "next man up" work in 2012? If the ultimate goal is to win the Super Bowl, then "next man up" is a crock. If the ultimate goal is to win a division round game, then cool, it works.
The offense has looked very pedestrian without Lewis. 13 points without him yesterday vs a pretty average Washington D, and vs the NYJ without Lewis the offense sucked until the last two drives.
The Pats offense was pretty close to unstoppable with a healthy Dion Lewis. The offense has looked very pedestrian without Lewis. 13 points without him yesterday vs a pretty average Washington D, and vs the NYJ without Lewis the offense sucked until the last two drives.
.
Heard Welker still wants to play. Give him #39, put him in at RB, and it'll be like Woodhead never left
Yea fuuuuhuhuhuuuck that noise. There's gotta be some good RB the Jets have released this year. Anyone?seeing ray rice's name floating around twitter..
the circus would be in town if we signed that jerk.
seeing ray rice's name floating around twitter..
the circus would be in town if we signed that jerk.
Like a loser I went & did some of the math for games without a starting third down back, in this case my study was the 2013 season in which the Pats lost Shane Vereen for 8 games. In games Vereen played the Patriots averaged 29.2 ppg and in the games he missed they averaged 26.3, so field goal difference.
As I like to do when I work with stats like this, I like to adjust for outliers - in this case I discarded the high & low score of each test group (a 55 point outburst vs Pit, a 6 point egg vs Cin, a 16 point yuck vs Den & a 43 point performance vs Ind) and we have the pats scoring 29.1 with Vereen and 25.0 without him.
So there's a bit of insight into the effect the loss of Lewis may have on the offense...
With a sample size of 8, I don't understand why you'd think it's wise to discard 25% of the numbers? They aren't "outliers" when there's only 8 games.Like a loser I went & did some of the math for games without a starting third down back, in this case my study was the 2013 season in which the Pats lost Shane Vereen for 8 games. In games Vereen played the Patriots averaged 29.2 ppg and in the games he missed they averaged 26.3, so field goal difference.
As I like to do when I work with stats like this, I like to adjust for outliers - in this case I discarded the high & low score of each test group (a 55 point outburst vs Pit, a 6 point egg vs Cin, a 16 point yuck vs Den & a 43 point performance vs Ind) and we have the pats scoring 29.1 with Vereen and 25.0 without him.
So there's a bit of insight into the effect the loss of Lewis may have on the offense...
They put 30 points up on the jets. Their season average is 34.5. To say the offense sucked is laughable.