PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

538's Complete History of the NFL


Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't disagree with their conclusions really. The 49ers had an amazing run from the 1980s through the 1990s. The Pats have a chance to equal or better that as long as TFB is still playing at this or similar level for a few more years. Personally, I'd say the Pats and 49ers are pretty damned equal as far as dynasties go. The only knock is that the 49ers did win one more SB after Joe left...if the Pats get that fifth SB...well...
 
I can't disagree with their conclusions really. The 49ers had an amazing run from the 1980s through the 1990s. The Pats have a chance to equal or better that as long as TFB is still playing at this or similar level for a few more years. Personally, I'd say the Pats and 49ers are pretty damned equal as far as dynasties go. The only knock is that the 49ers did win one more SB after Joe left...if the Pats get that fifth SB...well...

The 49ers cheated the system by circumventing the salary cap....so I don't hold them in as much high regard as you do

http://articles.latimes.com/1994-09-25/sports/sp-42797_1_salary-cap
 
Nate Silver is a cold hearted snake. And I mean that in the best way possible. He's Mr. Spock, it's pure numbers no emotion.
 
Yes I get that we're only talking a few years in the 90s, but it still has to be taken into consideration.

http://yourteamcheats.com/SF#Salarycapgate-2000

I see what you're saying, but for my money, it's the Montana years that made the run special. Once we can get to a point where we're comparing a 17-year Pats run to the 17-year 49ers run, then I'm with you. No matter what people say about the Pats, cheating the salary cap is a far more consequential violation than the placement of a camera.
 
If you are going to compare football 'dynasties', then you really need to separate those franchises in to two groups: one before the salary cap and free agency, another in the free agency/salary cap era.

To compare the two is apples and oranges. It's no different than comparing quarterbacks like Johnny Unitas, Otto Graham and even Dan Marino to today's quarterbacks based simply on raw stats.
 
If you are going to compare football 'dynasties', then you really need to separate those franchises in to two groups: one before the salary cap and free agency, another in the free agency/salary cap era.

To compare the two is apples and oranges. It's no different than comparing quarterbacks like Johnny Unitas, Otto Graham and even Dan Marino to today's quarterbacks based simply on raw stats.

That's quite true, but maybe that's what makes what the Pats have done so transcendant. Even with a salary cap, you can compare the Pats to the best in NFL history. Makes me reconsider placing them on par with the 49ers when you put it in that light. This might be one of the great achievements in sport...
 
Why were they so selective with their charts? They chart the 49'ers for a 20 year period and the Patriots for a 95 year period, making the 49'ers look a lot better than the Pats. Charting the Patriots from 1995 through to today (20 year period) presents a more favorable comparison of the two teams.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    78.8 KB · Views: 5
The best way to compare QB's across time is their W-L %, while rules and play styles vary, the QB has to perform in the clutch for their team to get the W.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/23: News and Notes
MORSE: Final 7 Round Patriots Mock Draft, Matthew Slater News
Bruschi’s Proudest Moment: Former LB Speaks to MusketFire’s Marshall in Recent Interview
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/22: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-21, Kraft-Belichick, A.J. Brown Trade?
MORSE: Patriots Draft Needs and Draft Related Info
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/19: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/18/24
Thursday Patriots Notebook 4/18: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 4/17: News and Notes
Back
Top