... no, that's not even remotely what I said. Maybe you need to go back and reread my post, because this is a bunch of nonsense that has literally no bearing at all on anything I wrote. And the implicit equivalency in targets here makes this kind of fourth-grade 'analysis' worse than useless. It's actively misleading, by suggesting such asinine conclusions as "apparently Chandler has better hands than Gronk".
Nobody in this thread has at any point claimed that one bad game is a benchworthy offense, or that the receiver depth chart should be ranked according to reception/target ratio. Trying to distort the many arguments against your point into such an obvious straw man is awfully disingenuous of you.
Everyone has bad games from time to time. Dobson has had a bad career with occasional blips of competence. Those small blips don't cancel out the many unremarkable-to-bad weeks that surround them. If you insist on being unable to distinguish between the two, then I don't think I can help you.