Goodell on Mike & Mike Tomorrow

What a clown show that will be...I'm sure he'll fire a few shots prior to opening night. Didn't want to be a distraction, remember? Sure. We shall see what he says tomorrow. Leave it be Roger...you don't understand the meaning of integrity.

Wish they would ask him why the picks were taken if he saw this as the same situation to a PED violation and also because the Wells report said BB and the organization did nothing wrong. Soooo....

This should be good. By good I mean on par with a root canal without anesthesia.

Oh, the softballs that will be lobbed! Who wants to bet on the followup questions that will be asked? Or if there will be any (my guess is zero).

There are questions that could ask:

1) Why are you appealing?
2) Do you still believe Brady lied?
3) Why did you let this go this far?
4) Did Brady really agree to accept one game for non-cooperation?
5) Who in the league office screwed this up?

I generally like Mike and mike. I like golic more when it comes to discussions involving football. But espn is so far up the nfl's *** this interview should be lame and another excuse to sell subway sandwiches. I have never believed in conspiracies. I usually think people who do are nuts. But with the way espn has treated brady and echoed the nfl throughout this whole case I'm beginning to think we need Mulder and Scully on the case

"Tom Brady is a fine young man, but I did not find his testimony credible"
"It's my job to uphold the integrity of the league"
"I think our attorneys did a fine job."
"I have great respect for Ted Wells."

There. Now you don't have to listen.

MagicMarker said:

There are questions that could ask:

1) Why are you appealing?
2) Do you still believe Brady lied?
3) Why did you let this go this far?
4) Did Brady really agree to accept one game for non-cooperation?
5) Who in the league office screwed this up?

Click to expand...

And what makes you think ANY of his answers wouldnt be a total lie?

That show is an absolute joke, ESPN fueled propaganda machine

MagicMarker said:

There are questions that could ask:

Click to expand...

1) Why are you appealing?
"We're involved in some ongoing litigation right now in the interest of protecting the integrity of our sport. That process is ongoing. Right now I think our focus should be on the start of this season"
2) Do you still believe Brady lied?
"Tom Brady is a fine young man and a very passionate player, but he is still subject to the same rules as every player, coach, and owner in the league. These rules apply to everyone and we do our best to enforce them fairly and to give players a fair chance to appeal."
3) Why did you let this go this far?
"We certainly feel the need to protect the integrity of our sport. We've always pursued that and will continue to pursue it, but right now I think the focus should be on the start of the season.
4) Did Brady really agree to accept one game for non-cooperation?
"We engaged in some talks during the hearing process in New York over the past couple of weeks. Unfortunately we were not able to come to an agreement. Tom's a fine young man. He's very passionate about football."
5) Who in the league office screwed this up?
"We do our best to preserve the integrity of the game. That's always been our goal and we will continue to work to make sure that there is a fair and level playing field."

Tom Brady's dad should call in........in fact, the guy should become a professional Goodell heckler

What's the over under in how many times he says integrity of the game?

Goodell obviously is not the Warren Beatty character in fact just the opposite maybe that's what made me think of Bulworth.


"You know the guy in the booth who's talking to you in that tiny little earphone? He's afraid the guys at network are gonna tell him that he's through/ If he lets a guy keep talking like I'm talking to you/ Cause the corporations got the networks and they get to say who gets to talk about the country and who's crazy today/ I would cut to a commercial if you still want this job/ Because you may not be back tomorrow with this cooperate mob/Cut to commercial, cut to commercial, cut to commercial. Ok ok I got a simple question that I'd like to ask of this network/ That pays you for performing this task/ How come they got the airwaves? They're the peoples aren't they? Wouldn't they be worth 70 billion to the public today? If some money-grubbin Congress didn't give them away for big campaign money? It's hopeless you see/ If you're runnin for office with out no TV/If you don't get big money/ You get a defeat/ Corporations and broadcasters make you dead meat/ You been taught in this country there's speech that is free/ But free don't get you no spots on TV/If you want to have senators not on the take/ Then give them free air time/ They won't have to fake/ Telecommunications is the name of the beast/that, that, that, that, that's eating up the world from the west to the east/ The movies, the tabloids, TV and magazines/ they tell us what to think and do/ And all our hopes and dreams/ All this information makes America phat/ But if the company's outta the country/ How American is that? But we got Americans with families that can't even buy a meal/ Ask a brother who's been downsized if he's getting any deal/ Or a white boy bustin ass til they put him in his grave/ He ain't gotta be a black boy to be livin like a slave/ Rich people have always stayed on top by dividing white people from colored people/ but white people got more in common with colored people then they do with rich people/ we just gotta eliminate them. White people, black people, brown people, yellow people, get rid of 'em all/ All we need is a voluntary, free spirited, open-ended program of procreative racial deconstruction/ Everybody just gotta keep ****in' everybody til they're all the same color"

Bella*chick said:

Oh, the softballs that will be lobbed

Click to expand...

And he won't even respond to the softball questions with actual answers. He'll dance around them by babbling incoherently without giving any relevant information, like he did when Ben Trollin' asked why the NFL never corrected Mort's 11-of-12 tweet

There's a reason he picked ESPN to go on. You know all questions have been screened already.

the Patriot said:

1) Why are you appealing?
"We're involved in some ongoing litigation right now in the interest of protecting the integrity of our sport. That process is ongoing. Right now I think our focus should be on the start of this season"
2) Do you still believe Brady lied?
"Tom Brady is a fine young man and a very passionate player, but he is still subject to the same rules as every player, coach, and owner in the league. These rules apply to everyone and we do our best to enforce them fairly and to give players a fair chance to appeal."
3) Why did you let this go this far?
"We certainly feel the need to protect the integrity of our sport. We've always pursued that and will continue to pursue it, but right now I think the focus should be on the start of the season.
4) Did Brady really agree to accept one game for non-cooperation?
"We engaged in some talks during the hearing process in New York over the past couple of weeks. Unfortunately we were not able to come to an agreement. Tom's a fine young man. He's very passionate about football."
5) Who in the league office screwed this up?
"We do our best to preserve the integrity of the game. That's always been our goal and we will continue to work to make sure that there is a fair and level playing field."

Click to expand...

Boys we found Roger!

IllegalContact said:

Tom Brady's dad should call in........in fact, the guy should become a professional Goodell heckler

Click to expand...

It's not that type of show unfortunately. Producers at ESPN would never allow Goodall to be sandbagged like that live on air

Question is: does either Mike or Mike have the cajones to ask Scheisskopf anything remotely resembling a tough question?

There's no way ...

So Mike and Mike and Kensil and Pash and Mort are butt buddies.

It's possible that the two of them will do something more than play to the Obergruppenführer's ego. But I doubt it -- they're just a pair of ESPN stooges.

At least Peter King acknowledges that he was a fool.

http://itiswhatitis.weei.com/sports...gate-coverage-i-dont-have-any-defense-for-it/

Can you say, BOYCOTT?