SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.This guy is seriously brain-damaged.
I hate to admit it but I have argued labor and other cases before the Second Circuit. Munson's view is . . . to use a hallowed legal term . . . horseshit.
What?!? Are you saying that the appeal court will over turn Berman because judges don't like to overturn arbitrator's judgements, the NFL have won in the Second Circuit of Appeals before, and the NFL was just unlucky to get a bad judge aren't solid legal arguments? What kind of lawyer are you?
This part was just stunning to me:
"The law that protects arbitrators' decisions from judicial interference is a fundamental principle of American labor law. Goodell, in contrast to his bungling of the Rice, Peterson and Bountygate investigations, led a process that produced a solid investigation. Goodell's 20-page decision was impressive in its analysis of the evidence and its application of the "conduct detrimental" clauses of the CBA and the standard player contract."
Rg: But what about the evidence that indicates no deflation scheme took place? Will I have to share it?"Just imagine if that you have Jeff Pash giving Goodell the same advice that Lester Munson has been writing about.
"Should I suspend Brady for 4 games?"
Yeah, why not, it's all covered under article 46
"Even though there is no notice of a 4 game suspension for doing this?"
Yup. Go right ahead.
"Okay, and when he appeals should I hear it or someone else"
You should hear it.
"And if they want to call witnesses, can I say no?"
Definitely, article 46
"Okay, should I make evidence available to them"
If you want to, but why? Article 46
"Should I further the indictment against him on appeal beyond general awareness?"
Seriously, just do whatever you want.
"Awesome thanks."