LOL, Rolling Stone just released their special "we all got beat by the Patriots" edition

Unstoppable rise of Andrew Luck. Lol Id take Peyton at 39 over him.

Unstoppable rise? Guess they didn't watch 45-7, or any of the 4 Pats/Colts games for that matter.

From the same people who put Dzokhar Tsarnaev on their cover.

Andrew Luck is a good player but as a Pats fan it is hard to take the hype about him seriously.

Not only is he 0-4 against the Pats, his team got their asses kicked every single time with him putting forth ****ty performances again and again. Twice in the playoffs.

If he starts beating us, I'll start respecting him. But he hasn't earned it.

It's true the Patriots have had Andrew Luck's number for whatever reason. But I feel this is the season he becomes MVP and finally beats us (in the regular season)

Banjo said:

It's true the Patriots have had Andrew Luck's number for whatever reason. But I feel this is the season he becomes MVP and finally beats us (in the regular season)

Click to expand...

Why?

I do expect I thought out reply, not "it's his time." There is absolutely nothing to support this, at all.

Kdo5 said:

Andrew Luck is a good player but as a Pats fan it is hard to take the hype about him seriously.

Click to expand...

No, it's not. All you have to do is watch him play.

If Brady retired tomorrow, and the Patriots could take any QB in the league except Rodgers (or JAG, to quiet the homers), Andrew Luck would be the guy they picked.


And rightly so.

Banjo said:

It's true the Patriots have had Andrew Luck's number for whatever reason. But I feel this is the season he becomes MVP and finally beats us (in the regular season)

Click to expand...

We had his number but more than his number we've had the Colts D's number......and what do you base him being MVP this year on?

Deus Irae said:

No, it's not. All you have to do is watch him play.

If Brady retired tomorrow, and the Patriots could take any QB in the league except Rodgers, Andrew Luck would be the guy they picked.


And rightly so.

Click to expand...

Drew Brees? Philip Rivers?

I seriously cannot understand why anyone has an issue with Luck. He's not a ****, he's said over and over that we beat them fair and square and he's a great young QB who has lived up to the hype.

Chiuba E. Obele said:

Drew Brees? Philip Rivers?

Click to expand...

In terms of young, up and coming QBs, no one is even close to Luck. It just so happens that we've had his number so far, and we all hope that continues.

I'm just surprised that Rolling Stone included Dez Bryant in that group. I suppose it makes for interesting reading.

Wilson and Luck are clearly the new pretty boys of the NFL, so they are to be expected.

supafly said:

Wilson and Luck are clearly the new pretty boys of the NFL, so they are to be expected.

Click to expand...

supafly said:

In terms of young, up and coming QBs, no one is even close to Luck. It just so happens that we've had his number so far, and we all hope that continues.

Click to expand...

I'll grant you that...still doesn't change the fact that his team is run by petty, bitter, resentful douchebags who care more about checking PSI levels at halftime, than they do about putting up a fight on the field.

And I can't get over the fact that the Colts intentionally lost games in order to draft Luck. I mean, that's about as low as you can go.

No matter how talented Andrew Luck is, I'll never be able to separate him from the organization he works for. If you work for assholes...then you'll get treated like one. End of story.

BradyFTW! said:

Unstoppable rise? Guess they didn't watch 45-7, or any of the 4 Pats/Colts games for that matter.

Click to expand...

BB beat Peyton like drum numerous times, but eventually he became competitive against the Pats. It could easily happen with Luck as well.

FourierSeries said:

Click to expand...

Deus Irae said:

No, it's not. All you have to do is watch him play.

If Brady retired tomorrow, and the Patriots could take any QB in the league except Rodgers (or JAG, to quiet the homers), Andrew Luck would be the guy they picked.


And rightly so.

Click to expand...

I'd take Rodgers as the first pick. After that I'd take Rivers.

Home team deal. Made woody (rb) look like a stud...
**** line, and mediocre at best wrs...and he made em look good! Hell, swap Gates with Gronk...

Rivers will play on a bumb leg, go reference the lt game...

Luck needs his crack head owner to ***** at the NYJ head of league to make their excuse for being whooped 45-7...**** LUCK

PatsWSB47 said:

We had his number but more than his number we've had the Colts D's number......and what do you base him being MVP this year on?

Click to expand...

The Colts have made really nice improvements on offense. Luck had 40 TDs last year. No reason he can't push for 45+ this season. Plus their schedule is complete cake. They will go undefeated in their division and ultimately end up 12-4 or 13-3, which will be good enough for Luck to win MVP.

Kdo5 said:

Andrew Luck is a good player but as a Pats fan it is hard to take the hype about him seriously.

Not only is he 0-4 against the Pats, his team got their asses kicked every single time with him putting forth ****ty performances again and again. Twice in the playoffs.

If he starts beating us, I'll start respecting him. But he hasn't earned it.

Click to expand...

You can't deny Andrew Luck is a supremely talented Quarterback but his pontification is hilarious. Indy has replaced Manning with Manning. That bodes well for New England.