Brady v. NFL Court Hearing Thread (8/31) - Live Update and Tweets

Todd Bradley said:

You're taking my "initial post" way too literal in order to fit your argumentative agenda. I could care less what the initial view "people" had. Some "people" originally thought it was a joke, which in reality it was/is, and that it would be put to bed early. Until the Wells Report came out, several "people" thought this was a tiny blip that would pass over quickly. The tide turned in Brady's favor pretty quickly, then the Wells' sham report squashed that promptly.

The fact of the matter is, there was HUNDREDS of tweets/articels that made us fans think this would be over quick: one prominent one was Sharks of Vegas, along with certain tweets from many different journalists such as Schefter who once predicted this would end in Brady's favor early on, etc, etc, etc. Heck, go back to the Super Bowl broadcast, where Michaels and Collinsworth

I'm not going to find all those instances that got us fans here excited early so you can have your own private party...

Stop splitting hairs and move on.

Click to expand...

Deus Irae said:

You made a false claim. You keep doubling down on it, when it's simply not true. That's on you for spreading falsehoods. You said the conversation had run its course. I agree. We're done here.

Click to expand...

Todd Bradley said:

As I said a post above, all I said was that there was hundreds of tweets and articles that got us excited that this situation would be resolved in Brady's favor.

That's about as truthful as truth can get, especially if you've spent time on this board in 2015.

How you consider that "false" is beyond logical thinking... For some odd reason, you want to argue against my comment, which is so astronomically dumb that it blows my mind.....

Click to expand...

Deus Irae said:

Again, we're done here. You made a false claim. I pointed that out. Time to move on.

Click to expand...

cscirpoli said:

The information in the article is common knowledge

Click to expand...

Deus Irae said:

Those wondering what was meant by the NFLPA statement today might find this interesting:

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...-brady-was-open-to-serving-onegame-suspension

Click to expand...

Deus Irae said:

You made a false claim.

Click to expand...

Deus Irae said:

It's simply not the way things went. People didn't even really start to turn until after some of us began to shred the Wells report.

Click to expand...

Fencer said:

Actually, he made a true factual claim; you just think that the inferences he tried to draw from it were baseless. And you're correct in that opinion.

Click to expand...

Deus Irae said:

I sent him a PM in order to end this in the thread. I'll leave it at that.

Click to expand...

Todd Bradley said:

Nothing I said was "false". In fact, the irony here, is that you're the only one in this conversation making "false claims".

I'm done here. I'm losing brain cells talking to you...

Click to expand...

mosi said:

I got a bad feeling about this. My gut feeling is that if the Judge really thought Brady was being railroaded and was 100% innocent, he would not push for a settlement. Because of that, I think he will rule in favor of the NFL and give Goodell absolute power. I also think that Brady should retire and say fck you to the NFL and Kraft and go live his life with his hot ass wife.

Click to expand...

TBR said:

The key words are that he was supposedly willing to accept 1 game for "not cooperating" . But even that in itself is ridiculous to accept a suspension for. Plus, didn't Wells himself commend Brady for his cooperation?

Click to expand...

Deflatemyballs said:

Bring up the Jamie Collins pick

Click to expand...

Todd Bradley said:

lol let's let sleeping dogs lie...

Click to expand...

Palm Beach Pats Fan said:

I'd LOVE for them to repeat that with footballs that differed by 0.2 psi instead of 2 psi.

Click to expand...