The Official Jane Rosenberg Pregame Thread

shmessy said:

Albert Breer ✔ @AlbertBreer
YES!!!!! RT @ScottIsaacs: Sketch artist Jane Rosenberg is ready for another shot at drawing Tom Brady during hearing pic.twitter.com/QR6MwQSXzo


1 RETWEET

Click to expand...

She looks like she's hiding something. Non-regulation crayons, maybe?

http://nesn.com/2015/08/infamous-tom-brady-sketch-artist-has-been-practicing-for-redemption-photo/

LOL! That looks pretty damn good. I bet when she was presenting that sketch she was like, "There! Are you *$%#ing happy now??!!!".

wtf is this?? are you kidding me?

brady always exudes a heavenly glow -- she made him look like just some dude!!

that's brady 8 years later. he should've made him look younger with cooler hair cut.

78/100

Stephen BrownVerified account‏@PPVSRB
And here's Jane Rosenberg's sketch of Tom Brady from today's hearing. "It was a nightmare."



Still looks like shyte to me

Horrible

Aw, come on. She is under major time constraints. Does anyone here draw? Because I do and I can appreciate what she can turn out in a brief amount of time. Her portrait of Brady earlier in the thread obviously shows what she can do if given longer than a few minutes.

As I said before and I will say again, every time Goodell gets into one of these controversies, everyone involved ends up losing and looking bad. Poor Jane Rosenberg's credibility is irreparably damaged by this who thing. Thank you Roger Goodell.

Damn, I was rooting for her!

So sad...........this is like the Aaron Dobson watch. Every now and then, there is a glimmer of hope, then WHAM! reverts back to the same old.

Now I'm depressed.

(Actually, I'm just funnin'. With the time contraints she's under - it's really quite good. It just is a pretty impossible job to do - - especially when the audience is a bunch of hero worshippers of the subject who have watched that face for 15 years. Her non-time sensitive portrait of him was rather good).

Rob0729 said:

As I said before and I will say again, every time Goodell gets into one of these controversies, everyone involved ends up losing and looking bad. Poor Jane Rosenberg's credibility is irreparably damaged by this who thing. Thank you Roger Goodell.

Click to expand...

Yeah, Rob, she's crying all the way to the bank!

Chiuba E. Obele said:

Horrible

Click to expand...

She had five minutes. Not too bad.

shmessy said:

Yeah, Rob, she's crying all the way to the bank!

Click to expand...

One thing is for sure….I'm not sure a courtroom sketch artist has ever in the history of ever received the kind of publicity she has.

Bella*chick said:

Aw, come on. She is under major time constraints. Does anyone here draw? Because I do and I can appreciate what she can turn out in a brief amount of time. Her portrait of Brady earlier in the thread obviously shows what she can do if given longer than a few minutes.

Click to expand...

She's no hack, but... If she has trouble drawing under time constraints, maybe she's not so well cut-out for a job that demands that you always work under severe time constraints!

Tony2046 said:

She had five minutes. Not too bad.

Click to expand...

And in that five minutes she had to draw a lot more than just Tom Brady. She's really quite good.

Palm Beach Pats Fan said:

She's no hack, but... If she has trouble drawing under time constraints, maybe she's not so well cut-out for a job that demands that you always work under severe time constraints!

Click to expand...

I am going to assume you don't draw? Because it is literally impossible to do photo realistic images of people in five minutes. Most courtroom stuff goes a tad longer and well into hours. Most of her courtroom sketches are really excellent. So a face or two isn't right. Big deal. She gets it mostly right.

I'd like a framed copy of her earlier work "Goodell vomiting."

In this day and age, why do we need courtroom sketch artists anyway?

Come to think of it, why did they need a courtroom sketch artist like ever?

That's not Brady! What was Matt Damon doing in the courthouse?!