- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 30,995
- Reaction score
- 15,552
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I am sure there are plenty of things the Wells Report hides. He are some examples:
- Wells badgering Walt Anderson who claims that he is sure he used the logoed gauge that he was wrong and he could have used the unlogoed one.
- The true facts of the set up by the League
- Any investigation of the leaks by the League
- The full text threads of the incriminating texts so we can see the two or three texts he pulled out in context
- Any interview transcript.
- Any single quote from interviews from Brady, McNally, or Jastremski
- What Jeffrey Pash edited out when he was "wordsmithing" the Wells Report
- The different revisions of the Exponent report since the one included in the Wells Report was dated the day the report was released to the public
Excellent post. How Exponent was selected rather than other (more reputable) scientific consultants?
Sorry if someone has previously considered this, but it just occurred to me. I can certainly see someone at Columbia letting the cat out of the bag just because it was such a big deal. But what if someone within the LO realized they had no control over what Columbia would provide and someone realized that Exponent would provide them exactly what they wanted. Needing an excuse to drop Columbia, someone in the LO then leaked that they reached out to Columbia. Given what we now know, it's certainly plausible and very neatly fits in with the provided reason why Wells broke with Columbia. Why exactly would the LO be concerned with media leaks from Columbia? If it truly was a concern, they could have gone back to Columbia and gotten assurances that future leaks wouldn't happen. Seems like a bit of an overreaction to drop them just because of the story in the media.
My guess? Columbia looked at the data for 15 minutes and laughed in the League's faces. Something along the lines of "There's not enough money in the world that you could give us, to make us feed into your ******** narrative."
My guess? Columbia looked at the data for 15 minutes and laughed in the League's faces. Something along the lines of "There's not enough money in the world that you could give us, to make us feed into your ******** narrative."
Please, that was 6 months ago. Those notes have "mysteriously disappeared clerical error by now."Well, wouldn't that be worth going to discovery for!
Or maybe he promised Woody they could eat popcorn and watch "Game of Thrones" together, ogling the parade of floppy wieners.I am guessing if it was Johnson, Volin had to promise to take him for ice cream after he made his quote.
By not challenging the NFL in an appeal, Kraft has brought this onto the Patriots. He accepted a guilty plea no matter how he couched it during that Chamberlainesque press conference and in proclamations after that.
Also, what the NFL considers facts and what the rest of humanity considers facts diverge around reality. In the NFL's world, conjecture is considered hard fact.
Let me guess...ESPN is taking volins report and running with it all day and by tomorrow it'll lead the national nightly news...f*ck tennis ball head